Please talk about your understanding of "people"!

Human biological life or biological man refers to the creatures belonging to vertebrates, mammals, primates, hominids and hominids in biological classification. This creature is the peak of biological evolution so far. It has a series of unique characteristics different from other species in morphology, physiology and psychology, and has a unique genetic structure and three genetic materials different from other species. Many people think that fertilized eggs, fertilized eggs, embryos or fetuses are all human beings, which is based on this biological standard to demonstrate. But the people they are talking about are actually human biological life. It can be further illustrated by examples. Men whose cerebral cortex has been removed can continue to produce sperm. He is still a member of his species, and he still has human biological life. But as a person's personality life, as a social person, he died. Puchetti made an analogy: there is a house, and we want to know if there is anyone living upstairs, but for legal and ethical reasons, we can't go in and see it. We stood outside and watched. Listen, we hear the stove burning. It may be an automatic heater. This is the basic standard of human personality life as a social person. And these two standards are closely related. The essential feature of human personality, life or society is self-awareness. Therefore, people can be defined as entities with self-awareness. Many philosophers have discussed the importance of self-awareness. Descartes regards self-consciousness as his philosophical foundation: "I think, therefore I am." Kant believes that self-consciousness is not only the center of the world, but also the source of the world. Fichte even thinks: "I am everything." Wang Yangming also said that "everything is ready, only the east wind is needed". Of course, their idealism is wrong, but it also illustrates the importance of self-awareness from one side. Someone asked college students if they would like to make a deal with a monster: "This monster can raise your IQ to 400, make you a national leader, make your painting surpass Picasso and win the Nobel Prize, provided that you will never have any experience of self-awareness. Will you do it? " Most students don't want to, because they don't want to lose the ability of conscious experience. Without this ability, they are no longer people. It is this self-awareness that distinguishes a person from nonhuman primates, fertilized eggs, embryos, fetuses and brain death. It is this self-awareness that makes the continuum of the whole process of human development undergo qualitative change: when the human body develops to produce self-awareness, human biological life develops into human personality life, and when it irreversibly loses self-awareness, it reverts to human biological life. There are some difficulties in defining a person as a self-conscious entity. Some nonhuman primates seem to have self-awareness. For example, chimpanzees can recognize their faces and bodies in the mirror, and trained gorillas can speak with gestures and use the singular first person. However, the languages of some primitive ethnic tribes do not have the first person singular. But this issue can still be argued: for example, Keke and others cannot be said to have self-awareness, or they are just some individual exceptions; Tribes without the first person singular have no self-awareness, but their language is flawed and they lack vocabulary to express themselves. But it seems that self-awareness is not enough. We can further ask: how do human organisms produce self-awareness? Of course, self-awareness needs a certain biological matrix-the human brain as a prerequisite. But in isolation, self-awareness cannot be produced. Wolf child and other examples strongly prove this point. They have no self-awareness, only biological life, despite the human brain and human genetic material. Self-awareness must be produced in the communication and relationship with others, that is, it must be produced in social relations. Therefore, when we say that a baby has self-awareness at the age of two to three, it implies a premise that the baby is in normal social relations. Because the baby plays a certain role in certain social relations. And because of this social role, it interacts with other people in society. This social interaction made him shy. Chimpanzees who can identify themselves in the mirror do not have this social relationship. Individual apes such as Keke may have entered this social relationship, while babies from tribes without the first person singular are in some social relationship. So we get a definition that man is a self-conscious entity that plays a certain social role in social relations. Someone asked, how can people be separated? Aren't people all human? Otherwise. Once we meet aliens, what are they like? If they have bodies similar to ours and have self-awareness, they are both human beings ~ if their bodies cannot be included in our current biological classification system, but they have self-awareness, such as the aliens in E.T., then they are human beings, not human beings, so all human life is not human personality life. In fact, many human biological life will never become human personality life, that is, a large number of zygotes will never develop into childbirth. Probably, not all human life is human. Intelligent life on other planets is probably not human life. There is a process of change and development from human biological life to human personality life. So, what operational criteria do we use to determine when the baby has developed into a self-conscious person? It's hard. Because every baby's development is not exactly the same, regardless of the baby's own characteristics and environment. Therefore, the time for the development of self-awareness is early and late. On the other hand, once a baby is born, it is in social relations and plays a certain social role. Therefore, even if it is not a person according to the above definition, we should and can treat it as a person. Therefore, Xunzi's "life is the beginning of man" and Han Feizi's "man begins with life" are applicable here. But this is an operating standard, and for practical convenience, there will be exceptions. We will discuss this problem in other chapters. Answering the question "What is a person" can answer the question "What is a fetus". The fetus is not a human personality life, not a person, but it is not just a piece of tissue, an organ and an animal. It is a special entity with human biological life.

People can solve their own problems independently or create their own problems.

Man is something designed and created by the creator, and everything is under the control of the unknown or within the design program.

PS: Human biological life or biological human refers to the organisms belonging to Vertebrate, Mammalian, Primate, Hominidae and Genus in biological classification. This creature is the peak of biological evolution so far. It has a series of unique characteristics different from other species in morphology, physiology and psychology, and has a unique genetic structure and three genetic materials different from other species. Many people think that fertilized eggs, fertilized eggs, embryos or fetuses are all human beings, which is based on this biological standard to demonstrate. But the people they are talking about are actually human biological life. It can be further illustrated by examples. Men whose cerebral cortex has been removed can continue to produce sperm. He is still a member of his species, and he still has human biological life. But as a person's personality life, as a social person, he died. Puchetti made an analogy: there is a house, and we want to know if there is anyone living upstairs, but for legal and ethical reasons, we can't go in and see it. We stood outside and watched. Listen, we hear the stove burning. It may be an automatic heater. This is the basic standard of human personality life as a social person. And these two standards are closely related. The essential feature of human personality, life or society is self-awareness. Therefore, people can be defined as entities with self-awareness. Many philosophers have discussed the importance of self-awareness. Descartes regards self-consciousness as his philosophical foundation: "I think, therefore I am." Kant believes that self-consciousness is not only the center of the world, but also the source of the world. Fichte even thinks: "I am everything." Wang Yangming also said that "everything is ready, only the east wind is needed". Of course, their idealism is wrong, but it also illustrates the importance of self-awareness from one side. Someone asked college students if they would like to make a deal with a monster: "This monster can raise your IQ to 400, make you a national leader, make your painting surpass Picasso and win the Nobel Prize, provided that you will never have any experience of self-awareness. Will you do it? " Most students don't want to, because they don't want to lose the ability of conscious experience. Without this ability, they are no longer people. It is this self-awareness that distinguishes a person from nonhuman primates, fertilized eggs, embryos, fetuses and brain death. It is this self-awareness that makes the continuum of the whole process of human development undergo qualitative change: when the human body develops to produce self-awareness, human biological life develops into human personality life, and when it irreversibly loses self-awareness, it reverts to human biological life. There are some difficulties in defining a person as a self-conscious entity. Some nonhuman primates seem to have self-awareness. For example, chimpanzees can recognize their faces and bodies in the mirror, and trained gorillas can speak with gestures and use the singular first person. However, the languages of some primitive ethnic tribes do not have the first person singular. But this issue can still be argued: for example, Keke and others cannot be said to have self-awareness, or they are just some individual exceptions; Tribes without the first person singular have no self-awareness, but their language is flawed and they lack vocabulary to express themselves. But it seems that self-awareness is not enough. We can further ask: how do human organisms produce self-awareness? Of course, self-awareness needs a certain biological matrix-the human brain as a prerequisite. But in isolation, self-awareness cannot be produced. Wolf child and other examples strongly prove this point. They have no self-awareness, only biological life, despite the human brain and human genetic material. Self-awareness must be produced in the communication and relationship with others, that is, it must be produced in social relations. Therefore, when we say that a baby has self-awareness at the age of two to three, it implies a premise that the baby is in normal social relations. Because the baby plays a certain role in certain social relations. And because of this social role, it interacts with other people in society. This social interaction made him shy. Chimpanzees who can identify themselves in the mirror do not have this social relationship. Individual apes such as Keke may have entered this social relationship, while babies from tribes without the first person singular are in some social relationship. So we get a definition that man is a self-conscious entity that plays a certain social role in social relations. Someone asked, how can people be separated? Aren't people all human? Otherwise. Once we meet aliens, what are they like? If they have bodies similar to ours and have self-awareness, they are both human beings ~ if their bodies cannot be included in our current biological classification system, but they have self-awareness, such as the aliens in E.T., then they are human beings, not human beings, so all human life is not human personality life. In fact, many human biological life will never become human personality life, that is, a large number of zygotes will never develop into childbirth. Probably, not all human life is human. Intelligent life on other planets is probably not human life. There is a process of change and development from human biological life to human personality life. So, what operational criteria do we use to determine when the baby has developed into a self-conscious person? It's hard. Because every baby's development is not exactly the same, regardless of the baby's own characteristics and environment. Therefore, the time for the development of self-awareness is early and late. On the other hand, once a baby is born, it is in social relations and plays a certain social role. Therefore, even if it is not a person according to the above definition, we should and can treat it as a person. Therefore, Xunzi's "life is the beginning of man" and Han Feizi's "man begins with life" are applicable here. But this is an operating standard, so there will be exceptions for the sake of practicality and convenience. We will discuss this problem in other chapters. Answering the question "What is a person" can answer the question "What is a fetus". The fetus is not a human personality life, not a person, but it is not just a piece of tissue, an organ and an animal. It is a special entity with human biological life.