Why is Qualcomm processor better than MediaTek?

Born differently, Qualcomm belongs to the top enterprise in this industrial chain, and has the right to speak and patents of communication systems, such as cdma2000, which is led by Qualcomm. Any device supporting CDMA should pay the patent fee to Qualcomm, whether you are Apple or Samsung, which is enough to show Qualcomm's position in this industry.

In the history of mobile phone cpu manufacturing, Qualcomm has more details. In the past, many wm mobile phone CPUs were made in Qualcomm, and Android devices were mainly made in Qualcomm, with several G 1, G2, G3, and the first nexus. Except for a few models, nexus is basically Qualcomm. Even if Huawei has Hisilicon, the only nexus6p made by Huawei is from Qualcomm, which means at least.

Let's talk about MTK in MediaTek. In the era of Nokia's hegemony, MTK made a living by shanzhai, and MTK also created the prosperity of Huaqiang North. With the rise of Android, shanzhai began to decline, Huaqiang North was almost empty, and MTK faced a crisis and began to transform. The original processors were also aimed at the low-end market.

Probably in 20 13, a large number of thousand yuan machines using MT6589 appeared in the market. This processor has created a number of firsts in the industry, enabling MediaTek to smoothly transform. However, people and enterprises are easy to get carried away when things are too smooth. X 10, that is, MT6795 is the cpu that MTK tried to enter the high-end market, but it was turned into a thousand yuan by lei jun's red rice note2. Later, although it proved that the performance was good, it was not enough to call itself the "flagship". Its comprehensive performance is similar to that of Qualcomm's 808, and there is also a "wifi gate", which also shows that MTK is not successful enough.

X20 and x25 are mtk's best-selling processors recently. Their comprehensive performance is equivalent to that of Qualcomm 652, and they are also adopted by many mobile phones, mainly thousand yuan phones. However, it can be seen that they have been severely suppressed by Qualcomm, because there are 650 and 652 Xiaolong to choose from at the same price. However, from the perspective of Redmi note4 and 360n4s, mtk can undoubtedly give manufacturers more preferential treatment, because both of them support cdma (.

X25 is known as the flagship, but compared with 820, even the 1.8 down-converted version 820 used by Xiaomi 5 has poor performance. The Antu running score of x25 is about 9.7w, the 820 running score of 1.8 is about 10.7w, and the 820 running score of Full Blood is as high as 14w.