What do you think about rural development? Tell me about it.

rural people don't need to improve their quality, because the quality of most people in cities is not as good as that in rural areas, and rural areas don't need to worry about development, because rural areas are an important part of China's national strength. In other words, if the countryside is stable, the country will be rich and strong. If the countryside is backward, the country will decline day by day.

Rural people don't need to be preoccupied with the comparison with the city. With the urbanization of most rural residents, the land of the remaining population tends to expand. The primary goal of rural surplus population is to study advanced machinery and crop knowledge with the support of government science and technology and policies. Make bold innovations and merge land resources under the existing policies. Realize the integration and mechanized planting of crops. In this way, production efficiency will be greatly improved. Moreover, I also think this is a very good way to get rich.

We look at the development of rural areas objectively, but in backward rural areas, people are lack of knowledge and backward thinking, and dare not think or do it. In developed rural areas, the learning level is relatively improved, the thinking is developed, the thinking is active, and they know how to create opportunities, seize opportunities, and dare to fight.

this is the key to the difference!

so, stupid thought. Rural development is inseparable from the progress of science and technology, rural development is inseparable from the implementation of policies, and rural development is inseparable from progressive ideas!

actually, let's think about it. Is there no rich family in that rural area? Why are farmers, so they can get rich first? After understanding this, the countryside will be rich and strong!

furthermore, the urban development model is not suitable for rural areas, just as capitalism is not suitable for the development of China, in China. A considerable number of cities have developed by sacrificing a large number of rural environment and non-renewable resources. And whose resources can rural development sacrifice? Rural development can only be at the expense of the central and local finance, at the expense of their own shortcomings!

this is my idea, which may be a little extreme. I hope you won't forgive me. Ha ha...