The first batch of Redmi k50 was released by word of mouth, but its performance was not as good as that of k40s. Overthrow it? Is it worth buying?

K50, which has been on sale for a few days, basically has the first batch of users who grab goods, and the first batch of real word of mouth has been released.

The favorable rate of k50 is only 94%, which is far lower than that of k40s (97%), even lower than that of k40 sold for one year, which is equal to that of Xiaomi 12 sold for more than two months, and only higher than that of k50 esports version (93%).

To tell the truth, I'm a little disappointed!

Is it still worth buying? Again, wait and see, then explore.

What I'm waiting to see is the real word of mouth of real users. In this era of ubiquitous marketing, only the reputation of users is the truth.

Marketing can only rush a wave of sales, and evaluation can only prove one use.

If you want to weld the door for another whole year, the k50 will be a little hung up.

The final sales performance depends on the ability of friends: you are not denied the opportunity, but you are caught, and you are lame. That's a one-year k50 series.

I hope the manufacturers of other brands can give me some strength, don't hold their legs, and want me to turn around and buy yours and show some real skills.

I hope that users are no longer a year of being cut with leeks.

Because this is only the evaluation of the first batch of users for a few days, it can only be a temporary reference. Whether the follow-up is a counterattack or a rollover has to be explored again.

It is not surprising that k40s is well-known. It has continued the high reputation and high sales volume of k40 brand, and also carried out three major upgrades. 67w is fast enough, and the short board of optical image stabilization is added. The pricing from 1799 is also fragrant, so as long as there is no big problem, the k40 series can fight for another year.

However, I got some feedback. The price of k40 top edition varies greatly. It is understandable if the price is different because of different platforms or different activities. If you buy it, you will still choose official website or your own store, because you don't know other platforms and you are afraid of being cheated.

The last thing I want is for Xiaomi to reduce the distribution and quality of the newly produced k40. This cleverness is not worth the loss, and it will also ruin the K-series brand that was hard to build.

K50' s current bad reviews are as follows:

My overall feeling is: less expectations, less surprises.

In the past, it was tangled between k50, k40s and top k40. Now I prefer k40s. Who will I buy in the end? Anyway, the budget won't be available until May, and then we'll make up our minds according to word of mouth.

As for Xiaomi 10s recommended by some people, I will not consider it for the time being, but I still want to buy a new one.

Maybe I finally bought red rice note 12. Who knows, if there is a stunning configuration, I will turn around and place an order. Man is such a strange species that there are many different ideas in his mind.

It's just a cell phone. Don't be dead set, be consistent.

So at present, it is just a matter of fact. Deliberately making pictures can be ignored, but isn't the camera crooked? No, there is, although it is an individual.

What problem does this reflect?

I know something about making myself. Maybe it's the mold. I didn't do a good job in quality control, because there is a person who specializes in looking at the appearance of a production line, which is a key position. As a result, the camera was so big that I didn't notice it. I didn't find any scratches or glue. ...

Even if you make a toy for a few dollars, similar problems will be reworked, and people who look at the appearance will stretch and cry.

If it's because of the appearance, it's stretched or agreed to put it down. If it is found by the quality department, the stamp is qualified. If Xiaomi finds it, he also accepts it by default.

This is the last thing all users want to see. You can't ignore quality in order to rush sales, otherwise the so-called impact on high-end benchmark Apple is a joke.

Apple is also looking for someone to do OEM work, and the foundry is also looking for temporary workers to catch up with the goods, and it has been recalled because of quality problems. But overall, the quality is guaranteed, and Apple is not afraid of users running away, and it has a solid moat.

Xiaomi Redmi doesn't have this capital. If the emphasis is always on stacking rather than quality, once the stacking is overturned, users will have no desire to change machines or other brands.

Xiaomi Redmi has been very successful in recent years, and its brand has been established, but it is still a long way to go before it can sit back and relax.

I saw him rise from a tall building, he entertained guests, and his building collapsed.

Memories of the past are the teachers of the future.