Why am I opposed to ballistic missiles hitting aircraft carriers?

In view of the deviation in understanding caused by discussions in various posts, I will focus on my opinions on this topic in this post. If there are any errors, please correct me. A. Explanation of nouns. This post will first define the nouns involved in the discussion of some topics on the Internet. 2. HM: The ballistic missile in this topic hits the aircraft carrier. The "HM" in it refers to the aircraft carrier battle group. If we discuss it separately It is meaningless to attack an HM ship. 3. Time: The ballistic missile attack on an aircraft carrier in this topic is aimed at a tactical choice under the current situation where our army is at an extreme disadvantage compared with the US military's military strength. The period should be Between today and within a few years. PS: Some netizens suggested that it should be used as a means of attack "tomorrow", which will be discussed separately. 4. War background: Based on the opinions of online netizens, it is defined as the possible intervention of the US military in the war to liberate the Taiwan Strait, especially the possible war intervention of the US military HM battle group. 5. Feasibility: In this topic, the purpose of using ballistic missiles to attack aircraft carriers will be discussed as to whether it is feasible, and whether it can be practical is used as the evaluation criterion B. Analysis 1. From a strategic perspective, war is the product of intensified contradictions. No weapon can change this fact and is subordinate to this fact. Medium-range missiles are already a strategic weapon, and attacking HM battle groups is an obvious tactical behavior. The essence of using ballistics to attack HMs, this article believes that without countless modifications, its essence is as follows: Use medium-range The missile attacks limited maneuver point targets. The use of medium-range missiles to attack HM has the following problems to face: 1. The possibility of miscalculation. Nuclear deterrence is the basis of the current world "peace". Once this nuclear balance is destroyed, the consequences will not be quantifiable in the current discussion. It is expected that the use of medium-range missiles for tactical attacks will likely lead to misjudgment by the attacked party, and at least there is a realistic possibility of false alarms. No country can attack a medium-range missile launched at itself in the hope of believing in the "integrity" or "responsibility" of a certain power. No ship formation commander can trust the medium-range missile launched at its own formation. The missile attack will only be a conventional warhead attack in the conventional sense. If he believed it, he would be a modern version of Song Xianggong. For such a medium-range missile attack, any commander will clearly carry out strategic nuclear retaliation instead of just passively waiting for the medium-range missile to appear and intercept it. 2. From the perspective of killing effect, medium-range missiles are expensive carriers, responsible for the task of projecting strategic power, and bear the ultimate power that represents the cornerstone of national security. Using strategic forces for tactical use and only using conventional warheads in conventional attacks would be a huge waste and a very cost-effective approach. Any conventional warhead in the conventional sense cannot be compared with a nuclear warhead. To carry out an attack with only conventional warheads at such a high cost (weapons, system support, strategic risks) would not only be the absurdity of killing a chicken with a knife, but also the absurdity of using anti-aircraft guns to swat mosquitoes. Therefore, Jiang Dao believes that from a strategic perspective, using medium-range missiles to attack mobile targets is an approach that outweighs the gains and losses. 2. From the perspective of tactical use, theoretically, as long as it is supported by a sensor system and can meet the firepower delivery and firepower intensity requirements, any weapon that meets these conditions has the possibility to sink the HM.