Why do some people think that people who are too emotional are basically poor?

Why do some people feel too emotional?

People are basically poor?

Because "attaching importance to feelings" is not a quality that a capital host will have. Even "attaching importance to feelings" will be the quality eliminated by capital.

Because the essence of capital is "profit-seeking", and the performance of attaching importance to feelings is "

Let profit. "

What qualities should a capital host have? Marx has said:

When the profit reaches 10%, they will be eager to move; When the profit reaches 50%, they will take risks; When the profit reaches 100%, they dare to trample on all the laws of the world; When the profit reaches 300%, they dare to risk dying.

Capital is not a concrete existence, it must be deposited to be endless. Those who can be elected as presenters are capitalists, and they can also be called rich people.

I have dealt with many rich people with wealth and rich second generation, and found that there are many good people among them.

They will be full of benevolence, righteousness and morality, and they will also be keen to support the younger generation.

They are personable and make money with kindness.

I used to think it was "if you have money, you must be kind."

Later, after some things, I discovered that this is not an illusion, but it is not the truth.

Successful wealthy generations will educate their sons and nephews to be honest with others and keep their promises.

Excellent rich second generation will listen to teaching, be sincere to others and keep their promises.

However, these are means, not ends.

Their gentleness, courtesy and frugality are the rules that need to be observed after reaching a certain circle, the section of dealing with people, and the wisdom of taking the former and abandoning the latter.

In the face of sufficient interests, it can be overthrown.

In the face of people in their own circles, they may still be very polite.

But that kind of courtesy is like your condescension when you were a stray dog in Lu Yu You Yue. It is your upbringing that you walk around it instead of kicking it, which has nothing to do with the beauty and ugliness of that dog.

The rich will also attach importance to feelings, but their attachment to feelings is only a means, and the purpose is to make a profit.

Rich people also have real friendship, but those who make friends bring their own chips. This chip can be a birth or a gift, but it must not be useless. You must not waste time pushing a cup for a change.

And in such friendship and mutual affection, everyone will tacitly avoid challenging the bottom line. The bottom line is interest.

Hello, I am good, everyone is good, if you make me bad, then no one will think about it.

The word "making money harmoniously" is just a joke without a certain basic disk. Just like "be lenient with others, be lenient with others", there is no premise of "out of the hole, invincible" in the first half of the sentence, just a comforting word when the weak lose. The "heavy affection" of capital hosts is their survival logic at that level.

Just like "keep a bag for safety" and "eat as soon as possible", it is the underlying survival logic. Logic does not distinguish between high and low, but only depends on what soil it is planted in. China's rich generation are mostly from the bottom, and they are naturally good at using the logic at the bottom. Moreover, they can stay in class for decades, which shows that they have strong learning ability and more experience in upper logic.

The poor people's "emphasis on feelings" is essentially through their own consumption, into social relations without interest returns, so as to meet the pure emotional value.

For example, "lend" one's few savings to relatives who are addicted to gambling. Even if you know in your heart that this is Shui Piao, it's hard for you to refuse the elder who sits opposite you and claims to have hugged you as a child. For example, skipping classes to go shopping with your girlfriend and holding hands can avoid challenging the bottom line. The bottom line is interest.

Hello, I am good, everyone is good, if you make me bad, then no one will think about it.

The word "making money harmoniously" is just a joke without a certain basic disk. Just like "be lenient with others, be lenient with others", there is no premise of "out of the hole, invincible" in the first half of the sentence, just a comforting word when the weak lose. The "heavy affection" of capital hosts is their survival logic at that level.

Just like "keep a bag for safety" and "eat as soon as possible", it is the underlying survival logic. Logic does not distinguish between high and low, but only depends on what soil it is planted in. China's rich generation are mostly from the bottom, and they are naturally good at using the logic at the bottom. Moreover, they can stay in class for decades, which shows that they have strong learning ability and more experience in upper logic.

The poor people's "emphasis on feelings" is essentially through their own consumption, into social relations without interest returns, so as to meet the pure emotional value.

For example, "lend" one's few savings to relatives who are addicted to gambling. Even if you know in your heart that this is Shui Piao, it's hard for you to refuse the elder who sits opposite you and claims to have hugged you as a child. For example, skipping classes to go shopping with your girlfriend and holding hands can make up for the missing knowledge, even if you know that you will break up with the person in front of you after graduation; For example, at the risk of leaving a stain on one's file, helping a friend cheat, or doing other things that are not compliant or even illegal, and then reaching a climax in the brotherly relationship on the wine table, but there is no real return.

Believe me, people who can be owners of capital will never do such a thing.

Because there is no real return, whether it is benefits or human feelings.

Instead, they will stay away from such people, because these people will only consume themselves.

Here, I am not praising the rich's "mercenary and emotional", nor am I looking down on the poor's "peace of mind and emotional".

I just want to say:

If you want to be a capital host, you must make a quantitative analysis of all the established morality and friendship, and then decide whether to do it or not.

If they are profitable, they can even give up their hospice care for their parents, give up the traditional family to warm their husband and wife's life, and give up the company of their children. Because for them, time is really wealth and needs to be carefully calculated.

The "heavy affection" of the poor is from the heart, and it is natural to give up one's few interests in order to meet each other's needs.

It is worth mentioning that if you are extremely poor, you will know. For example, in order to impersonate the old man's pension and subsistence allowance, he broke his leg and locked it in the house. "Mutual harm of human nature" is inevitably reflected in extreme poverty.

And "mutual harm of human nature" will also be revealed in front of the ultimate wealth.

It's just that in this era, this society, not too many people have been reduced to having to choose between a little money and a little kindness. And too many "poor people" who can't keep up often have to choose between sacrificing feelings and interests.

For the family, for the family, for the children, even high-intensity but super-high-paying jobs can be abandoned, which is really commendable. It's just a bitter taste, just like fish drinking water.

Finally, let's write a poem by Degang Guo: obey the law, face the court gloomily, and force the nocturne. Harm others and benefit themselves, be honest and fair, and starve.

Building bridges and roads is blind, and there are many people who kill and set fires. I went to the Western Heaven to ask my Buddha, who said he had a lot of incense.