Why is Curry obviously very powerful, but he is not recognized by some people?

As we know, Curry's nicknames are "Shen Meng" and "Pupil". As soon as we saw these nicknames, we knew that his impression in our hearts obviously had nothing to do with power. Curry's appearance is very deceptive. He looks bookish, MengMeng's, and then he is often funny on the court. Compared with those big men in the league, Curry really looks like a primary school student. Obviously, Curry will not be associated with strength in people's minds, and will not be recognized by some people.

We know that before Cole became the head coach of the Warriors, Curry's deterrent on the offensive end was far less powerful than it is now. Cole completely released Curry's energy on the offensive end, carrying complementary Thompson and Green to help him; Warriors play tactics, teamwork and cooperation. Curry is a vital part of tactics, and Curry is a systematic player. So some people think Curry is not good.

As we know, Curry is an epoch-making player, who started the game of small balls. However, some people will not recognize his play. Curry's main threat is three-pointers, and the main scoring method is also three-pointers. Many times we see Curry dribbling across the center line and shooting three-pointers directly. Many people don't like watching such plays. Unlike James, who went straight to Huanglong with the ball and scored a layup, he made a 2+ 1 from time to time. Many people may recognize this kind of play and think it is very powerful.

I believe Curry's performance in the third game of the finals must have conquered many people. Do you think Curry is good? Welcome to pay attention to the comments of professional basketball players!

In fact, this question is the same as reading. Everyone reads a book, and the taste is different. Curry is like a book. Different people read it, and the answer is of course different. So of course, some people will recognize Curry, and some people will not. This is a matter of opinion in itself, and there is no absolute official answer.

Let me give you another example. What is recognition and what is disapproval? They are interdependent and indispensable. Let me ask a question. If there is no disapproval, will there be a word with the meaning of "approval"? Obviously, if a player needs to be great, he must disagree. The whole world is "recognition", that is, there is no recognition because it has no meaning of existence.

Secondly, from the objective facts, Curry's physical talent is really not so good, which is a fact. So many preconceived people will judge that such people can't succeed in basketball, because their growth experience may also think that success must require talent, so Curry's success will undoubtedly make this type of people feel a little uncomfortable, and naturally they can only disapprove for the sake of disapproval, but this is understandable, because everyone has their own world outlook and values.

Curry's strength is really obvious. He won the NBA championship three times and the MVP in the regular season twice. Looking at the active NBA, besides LeBron James, Curry should be almost the second best player with personal honor, right? As the absolute core of the ball, getting such personal honor is undoubtedly a strong foundation in fact.

But sometimes it is unreasonable not to like it, and it is also reasonable not to recognize it. It is normal that people you like don't like it. If everyone must recognize Curry, it is not necessary to recognize Curry, because simple logic, powerful people know, why should others recognize it?

Maybe it's because of being bitten! Just kidding, Curry, as the first point guard in active service, won three championships, won two MVPs in the regular season, 1 scoring champion, 1 stealing champion, won six All-Stars and won 73 games, which is the embodiment of strength. He is only 30 years old and has broken almost all the three-point records. A few days ago, he scored 102 in the playoffs, becoming the first player in NBA history to break 100. There are dozens of gaps behind him. I really don't know where his limit is. Why do some people think this awesome point guard is not good? This has to start with his strengths.

Let's give a simple example. For example, in the village, people used to use Niu Gengdi and cow dung as fertilizer. As a result, one person drives a tractor to fertilize the land, which greatly improves the yield without blowing off dust. Do you think he will be popular in the village? Must have attracted a lot of people's jealousy and hate, because he died! This special person I'm talking about is Curry. When he used three points to create one record after another and let the league learn his moves, his effect could not be achieved. So many people think that he is very lucky and can change the way the league plays with three points. Isn't such a person awesome?

Durant was absent due to a leg injury in the west this year. Curry swept the Trailblazers with his dominance, averaging 36.5 points, 8.3 rebounds and 7.3 assists per game. His shooting percentage and three-point shooting percentage were as high as 47% and 43% respectively. Curry's performance fully deserves the title of MVP. When the Warriors have players like Durant and Green, but they are all impressed by Curry, Green is more like Curry's younger brother. Do you think Curry is not strong enough? Is it because he was framed for dunking occasionally?

Curry turned three-pointers into art.

Curry is famous in the league for his "abnormal quasi-"three-pointers, with 402 three-pointers in a single season, 13 in a single game and 100 in playoff. Curry is one of the many players who changed basketball style in NBA history, and it is under his leadership that the trend of small ball was blown up. Others don't recognize his Excellence. I think they are jealous!

When Durant is here, he is willing to hand over the ball. When Durant is away, he can stand up and score 30+ data in six consecutive games, leading the Warriors to sweep the Trailblazers and reach the finals! With Curry, the Warriors' locker room has become a rare happy team in the league. This is his personality charm. Such a three-point shooter with the strongest league history, why don't we like him!

I think it's preconceived. Players with high talents and high rankings will become the focus when they join. Fans watch them grow up, support them and love them. These players have a large number of loyal fans, and Curry is not optimistic from college to entering the league. His rise is inevitable and accidental. If the Warriors don't give Curry a chance, if Curry doesn't overcome the injury, the history of the league will lack the greatest shooter, and Curry lacks the foundation of loyal fans. Many fans have long supported players and teams, but they can't turn their heads to support Warriors and Curry, so it's not that fans don't recognize Curry, but that they don't recognize Curry. Recognizing Curry is tantamount to denying the star who has supported for many years. I won't admit that a player who has supported for so long has been overtaken by Curry, a rising star.

Warriors win championships in succession, facing 29 opponents. Moreover, the Warriors have only come into our sight in recent seasons. In China, there are many fans of the old and powerful teams such as Lakers, Rockets and Spurs, while the fans of Warriors are mainly young people. It is easy for them to annoy the supporters of other teams because of some remarks. They recruited many blacks for the Warriors. The quality of Warriors fans is uneven. Curry's strength is obvious to all, and his career is inspiring. Although Curry doesn't have the best physical fitness or the most talented player, he has made achievements that countless superstars can't match. Curry's career is only short of the title of the most valuable player in the finals. If he can lead the Warriors to win three consecutive championships, Curry's historical position in the NBA will skyrocket. He is a great basketball player.