Composition on the rare few chances in life

In life, are there “rare times to fight” or “rare times to get drunk”? Those who say "fight" and those who say "drunk" both have the premise that "life is short." Both seem to be reasonable, but neither seems to be accurate.

One day, I was chatting with friends. My friend said: "There is a question that still puzzles me, and that is: What is the purpose of being a human being? I want to write an article on this aspect, but it is still difficult to write it." I smiled and said: "I'm afraid no one can write this article. I can’t write.”

It seems that my friend’s confusion is the same as mine. In the final analysis, it is how to deal with the relationship between "fighting" and "drunk".

Which is right and who is wrong between "fighting" and "drunk" cannot be summed up in one word. A millionaire saw a fisherman lazing in the sun and suggested, "Why don't you work harder and make more money?" The fisherman said, "Why make more money?" The millionaire Anxiously: "If you make enough money, you can bask in the sun and enjoy life with peace of mind!" The fisherman still looked at him lazily and said, "Then what do you think I am doing now?"

This joke illustrates that there are two types of people: one must have a sense of security, and even if they have enough money, they dare not relax and bask in the sun. This kind of person must save the good food until the end when eating. For them, the most painful lesson is that when the meal is almost finished, when they are about to enjoy the delicious food, someone rushes up and takes the food away with chopsticks. The other kind of people can enter a relaxed state and bask in the sun at any time. This kind of person must be the kind of person who eats good food as soon as it is served. What this kind of people believe in is: no matter what, enjoy it first.

I think that the idea of ??a millionaire cannot be said to be wrong. People should pay attention first and then enjoy themselves. Otherwise, the pie will not fall from the sky. If there is no certain material foundation and we talk about enjoyment, we can only be "poor and happy" and "suffering and optimistic". The problem is that in real life, people like millionaires are reluctant to enjoy it easily even if they become multimillionaires or multimillionaires. Therefore, there is an idea that when people come to this world, they should give it a try; but the purpose of "fighting" is not just to "fight" for the sake of "fighting". If you only know how to fight hard all your life, and only know how to make money continuously, but not about enjoyment, won't you lose the meaning of "fighting"?

My father is a very frugal person: he is always reluctant to eat delicious things, and he never throws away unpalatable things. Every time I come to this point, I "investigate" the cause. My father said: I often think about the pain of not having money when I have money. Now I should also think about the time when I didn’t have enough to eat. In response to this, I asked again: If you don’t have enough to eat, and when you have something to eat, you are reluctant to eat it, then doesn’t that mean you won’t have anything to eat for the rest of your life? My father responded calmly and laughed it off.

In Mr. Lin Yutang's article "Sitting in a Chair", there is a passage that is quite interesting to read. He said in the article: "I admit that I often lie in a chair in the guest room of a friend's house. But others Why not? If the sofa chair is not designed for lying down, then why there is a sofa chair? If men and women in the twentieth century must sit upright, why should there be such a sofa chair in the modern living room, and we should sit upright? A shorter woman sits on a hard mahogany chair and has to hang with her feet in the air."

In this sense, I think, "a rare fight" and "a rare fight." "Drunk" cannot be partial to both. What needs to be grasped is whether to "fight" first and then "get drunk", or to "get drunk" first and then "fight". If this relationship is clarified, when it is time to "fight", you should "fight"; when it is time to "get drunk", you should also "get drunk". Although there are essential differences between the two, from the perspective of the essence of life, "fighting" is reflected in a kind of spiritual enjoyment; "drunk" is attributed to a kind of material satisfaction. Both can give people happiness. The problem is that there are always times when there are always some people who, when they should "fight" or "get drunk", are not allowed to "fight" or "drunk", they do not "fight", do not get "drunk" or cannot "fight" You can’t get “drunk”. At this point, real happiness and real enjoyment are out of the question.