Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - Views on Qi Jiguang
Views on Qi Jiguang
After reading a certain work, I believe everyone must have understood a lot. At this time, it is very necessary to write a review! Do you want to know how to write the feedback? The following are my thoughts on Qi Jiguang, which I have carefully compiled, hoping to help everyone. Qi Jiguang's thoughts 1
This film vividly depicts the patriotic spirit of a generation of famous Qi Jiguang, who tells such a story. Qi Jiguang, who was born in Jiangmen, was a famous military commander in the Ming Dynasty. He loved the art of war since he was a child and was proficient in the art of war when he was young. After his father's death, he inherited his father's command of the military and went to the southeast coast to resist the Japanese pirates. Qi Jiguang recruited 3 vigorous and brave miners and farmers in Yiwu, and trained them strictly to form a disciplined and brave Qijia Army, and Qi Jiguang became the young commander-in-chief of this army. In 1651, tens of thousands of Japanese invaders invaded the Zhoushi area in Zhejiang, Taiwan. Qi Jiguang fought with the new army for more than a month, wiped out more than 5, people in nine wars and nine victories, and won a total victory. Thousands of innocent people were rescued from the Japanese pirates, and then they moved to Fujian. After more than ten years of fighting, the Japanese pirates in the southeast coast were finally eliminated. After watching this movie, I can't help but think of now ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Extremely aroused China people's dissatisfaction with the Japanese right-wingers, which have been the territory of China and an inalienable part of the Chinese nation since ancient times. Now the Japanese have invaded my treasure island and plundered my resources. I really feel angry and helpless. I really appreciate the words of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty: those who make a strong Han will be punished if they go far away. Japan, a tiny island country, dares to invade our Chinese territory. This is undoubtedly a moth to the fire, bringing about its own destruction. With the development of time, the Japanese government not only didn't reflect on its own fault, but intensified its efforts to buy it, which further aggravated the' contradiction' between China and China. As a Japanese, I was very excited and excited to hear that there was also a protest March to protect fishing in our city on September 15th. I wanted to participate in it. Alas, that was my extravagant hope now.
a vast country, rich but not just, bullied me from all directions, and let me negotiate. This is China now, and I really want to ask, "What's wrong with China now? Didn't the lion wake up and the dragon take off? " Thoughts on Qi Jiguang 2
After watching the last episode of Qi Jiguang, an anti-Japanese hero, the two biggest feelings of Qi Jiguang series are, first of all, the joy of victory in the anti-Japanese war and the heroic spirit of Qi Jiguang Yu Dayou and other anti-Japanese heroes. Thirteen battles and thirteen victories, a war killed more than 1 people, but only lost three people. Many times, the weak defeated the strong, and finally cleared the enemy in the southeast coast. When Yu Dayou and Qi Jiguang swept away the enemy, Yu Dayou and Qi Jiguang stood on the cliff facing the sea in the last stronghold of the enemy in Guangzhou, saying, as famous officials of the present time, it is enough for us to sweep away the enemy. To be a hero for generations to come, we will go north to fight against the enemy. I was moved by this heroic spirit of giving my life for the country's security and stability. The second feeling is the desolation of Qi Jiguang in the old age. Because of political persecution, those who returned to their hometown in Penglai, Shandong Province, were the death of their nephew, their younger brother and sister-in-law, their son Qi Anguo, and their wife Wang's departure. Soon, they were all white-haired, poor and died alone. Many heroes in China have had such a deplorable ending. The final evaluation of historical figures is actually in the hearts of the people, not written by a few people or those in power. Although there are many regrets in history, in the end, the heroes left their names and heroic deeds in the long river of history, which is the greatest reward and comfort of history to the heroes.
History is what happened in the past. We can't go back in time, so we can only rely on historical data to analyze it, so naturally there are many different opinions. Therefore, many people have many different opinions on the lecturers of the lecture room. Because of different opinions, they attack each other. I want to say that the lecture room is a lecture to popularize the public, not a seminar on historical technology. Most teachers of the lecture room are standing in the mainstream position and telling some facts that are indeed confirmed. If you have different opinions on history, please put out accurate historical data to prove your point of view, and infer history with historical evidence and correct logical analysis, instead of using abusive attacks to explain your point of view. Some people curse the lecturer just for the sake of cursing, and even if they don't speak their own point of view. We should keep a calm and objective attitude towards history. After all, we can't go back to the past now.
Then, for some people, when attacking heroes in history, they say that they are just feudal guardians and lack the spirit of democracy. Please note that everyone has historical limitations. We stand in the era when historical figures live, and see if they are doing things for the benefit of the country, the nation and the people. I hate people who stand and talk like it's easy. Don't you think it's ridiculous to talk about democracy with people in feudal times? Why don't you tell Peking man about democracy? Is it okay to talk about science? History hasn't developed to that stage. Besides, complete democracy may not bring benefits to the country. Are Thailand and the Philippines democratic? What has it become now? Whoever thinks that historical figures are undemocratic will try to bring democracy to the hero image in your heart. What I hate most is this kind of historical hooligan who is divorced from reality and objectivity and evaluates historical figures at random to show his uniqueness.
Let's talk about ethnic groups again. Some people say that Qi Jiguang's resistance to Lu in the north was a civil war, which hit our present Mongolians. You should analyze it from an objective historical point of view. At that time, the nomadic people in the north often had the resources and wealth of the Central Plains people. We Central Plains people must protect ourselves. The Great Wall, the symbol of China, is such a line of defense to avoid being invaded and plundered. We have not yet reached the era of great ethnic integration, so we should not be divorced from the historical stage and those objective historical conditions. It's like if you live to be 8 years old and feel that you have a long life, you joke that Peking man can only live to be 5 years old, and Peking man is 5 years old, which is definitely a long life. We stand at the forefront of history and should treat historical figures fairly and objectively.
- Related articles
- Network Literature Theory ���� Network Literature and Artificial Intelligence Writing: Literary Spirit in the Age of Co-evolution of Man and Machine
- I dreamed that others laughed at me and called me a rookie.
- I want to know what is the difference between a writer, a writer, and a new writer? How are these three concepts defined?
- Excuse me, Putonghua teacher, do you want to read "light tone" or read pinyin in the Putonghua exam?
- Is Igoro Japanese?
- What are the major defects in the design of PS4 host?
- What will happen if you marry into a wealthy family?
- TV series "Baidu Cloud" 6 episodes
- There is a boat parked by the deserted river. This ship can only hold one person. Two people came to the river at the same time, and both of them crossed the river in this boat.
- Someone laughed at my words.