What are the comprehensive work contents of office words?

The comprehensive work of the office is mainly to summarize, refine and process the overall work situation, existing problems and policies and measures, and form comprehensive, informative, systematic and operable comprehensive written materials for leaders' reference and departments and units to follow. It is the headquarters and general hub of office writing work. The comprehensive level of writing style of party and government organs is a comprehensive reflection of the overall ideological level, theoretical level, policy level and work level, which plays a decisive role in the overall implementation of policies, decision-making and work implementation. Accordingly, this puts a very high demand on the comprehensive quality of secretaries engaged in text synthesis. The most basic requirement is predictability and induction; Able to analyze and be good at synthesis; Be able to compare and distinguish; Being able to abstract and be good at generalizing, therefore, the secretary of literature and literature synthesis should work hard to improve his comprehensive ability.

First, improve knowledge in understanding.

Synthesis is a kind of thinking ability and thinking method that is unified with analysis. It is to examine and understand all the attributes, parts and aspects of things as a whole through rational thinking. Scientific comprehensive analysis is a rational abstraction and generalization on the basis of careful investigation and study, and it is a high-level complex labor that provides high-quality services for leadership decision-making.

Comprehensive ability is essentially knowledge, such as memory, observation, imagination, foresight, judgment, expression, analysis, induction, abstraction, generalization, adaptation and so on. For secretaries engaged in text synthesis, these intellectual powers are not inherent and unchangeable, and they all have a task of "changing power" frequently. The so-called power change is to change the low-level knowledge power into the high-level knowledge power. Why do we sometimes feel that our work is "hard" and often feel that we can't do it? In the final analysis, it is lack of knowledge. Therefore, it should be a routine topic to change the strength of secretaries engaged in text synthesis. The situation is constantly changing and the requirements are constantly improving. If you don't constantly update your knowledge and improve your ability, it will be difficult to adapt to the new situation and new tasks.

Second, improve knowledge in learning.

The knowledge power in word synthesis is not the knowledge power in a certain field or aspect, but at least includes three levels, namely general knowledge, thinking methods and skills.

Common sense. It includes not only the basic knowledge of culture, science, theory and policy, economy and society that a secretary should have, but also the basic knowledge of writing that is necessary for writing synthesis. The basic knowledge of writing mainly includes grammar, rhetoric and logic. Not familiar with grammar knowledge, sentence structure does not conform to grammar; The language is not concise, the words are not vivid, and the words are not particular; Confused logic, unclear concepts and reversed relations will not only make jokes, but also seriously affect the quality of articles and the implementation of railway bureau decisions. Therefore, a secretary engaged in text synthesis should really master the basic skills of writing. Otherwise, the work will be difficult to do.

Thinking mode is the way and means for people to acquire some ideological knowledge. If the thinking method is correct, we can get a correct understanding according to the objective reality; If the thinking method is wrong, it will inevitably make the thought deviate from the objective reality, and it will be impossible to get a correct understanding. From the perspective of text synthesis, the correct thinking method has special significance. Why do some manuscripts look smooth literally, but they look dull and can't quench their thirst? The main reason is the lack of depth and intensity of ideological content. To solve this problem, we can't just think of ways in words, but should work hard to improve our cognitive ability. Liu Zhiji, a scholar in the Tang Dynasty, suggested that history should have three lengths: talent, learning and knowledge. Talent is the basic quality; Learning is writing ability; Knowledge is the way of thinking. As long as the viewpoint is correct and the method is proper, you will think deeply, see through everything and analyze things thoroughly, and what you write will be concise and to the point, and you will receive the effect of "talking without ornament, laughing without joy".

Skills and skills, for the comprehensive skills of words, are the skills and skills that combine the comprehensive skills between words and between lines. From the perspective of writing an article, it is the unification of the process of conception, planning and revision, which requires a solid writing foundation, good theoretical literacy, rich practical experience and skillful rhetorical ability. Standardized written expression solves the problems of accuracy and pertinence of the manuscript; Scientific thinking method solves the rationality and profundity of the manuscript; Skillful skills have solved the problem of readability and vividness of the manuscript. Through these aspects of harmony, conscious efforts in this regard, good at profound dialectical thinking and strict logical thinking in the work, the depth of seeing problems and writing articles will be significantly improved.

Third, constantly raise awareness in practice.

The enhancement and improvement of knowledge depends on a person's extensive knowledge, erudition and accumulation. In Han Dynasty, Heng Kuan said that we should "enrich the foundation and seek the height". In the Song Dynasty, Su Shi said that we should "learn from others' strengths, and many a mickle makes a mickle". In the Qing Dynasty, Tang Zhen said that "many a mickle makes a mickle". That's what I said. The knowledge power in the comprehensive work of words first needs the quality of "generalist". "Work is easy to be partial and difficult to find perfection." In view of the working nature of text synthesis, although it is "difficult", it must be "sought". Engaged in text synthesis, the demand for knowledge is infinite. Therefore, we should increase the input and accumulation of knowledge. If you invest a lot and have solid basic skills, you can hope to get output and get effective results. Of course, in real life, more input may not necessarily lead to more output. There is a question whether the method is scientific or not. In order to transform the input knowledge into the ability of text synthesis when necessary, we should pay special attention to the input around the application.

Correcting the way of thinking is, in the final analysis, really mastering materialist dialectics. This is the basic weapon to help us improve our cognitive ability. Only by truly turning materialist dialectics into a weapon in our own hands can we avoid reflecting the objective reality intuitively, passively and negatively when drafting manuscripts, and avoid analyzing things with isolated, one-sided and static views. The so-called proceeding from reality and seeking truth from facts are all said in this way, but the depth and effect of writing an article or making a speech will be varied. Some viewpoints are clear-cut, thorough in analysis and profound in feelings; Some are vague, weak and lost in shallowness. What's the reason? It's not a question of writing and eloquence, but a difference in the ability to use correct thinking methods. In the final analysis, it is the difference in cognitive ability. Therefore, only by learning and improving one's thinking method can one improve one's cognitive ability.