Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - How to choose Canon 990 980 970 870110/00?

How to choose Canon 990 980 970 870110/00?

LZ, I think you seem to have a higher eye.

If so, first exclude 1 10 and 100, because in terms of performance, this system (the system where they calculate two digits) cannot be compared with the system that uses three digits.

Let's talk first, so your expenses will be higher …

Then we list all 3-digit IXUS in 2007-09.

Where prefix 8 is a wide angle and prefix 9 is a telephoto.

9 prefix subdivision, a small CCD, a large CCD11.7 "

Eight words, small 9, big 9.

860 950 960 07

870 970 980 08

-990-09

Since 2007, there are only seven models.

Select the first column with wide angle and the second and third columns with slightly longer telephoto.

Because of time, the price is increasing from top to bottom according to the number of rows.

For the record, in the case of the same size CCD, the fewer pixels, the better. In the case of the same pixels, the bigger the CCD, the better, so I won't go into details here.

There are several possibilities to take sports with flowers:

The selected mode (sports mode), the focal length of the pull (the bigger the flower), the light of the scene (the darker the flower), the setting of ISO (the smaller the flower), the calculation of exposure (which will affect the speed), the flash (synchronization is easy to spend), and other factors (such as whether it is easy to focus, etc. ), these will all be spent.

Generally speaking, it is useless to test machines under the guidance of shop assistants, especially those who are unfamiliar with machines.

Although the CCD of 980 is relatively large, it is not necessarily better than that of 870, because there are too many pixels, and CCD has almost no advantage. In addition, the wide angle is weak, the macro is not strong and the appearance is poor. It is not as practical as 870 (it is estimated that the profit of shopping malls is high), so it is eliminated.

990 has no advantage, and it is also eliminated.

970 and 870 are the same year's products, except for the focal length (LCD screen ignored). Considering the appearance and material (970 is a plastic shell), it is still practical for 870 (the fourth generation processor is not easy to go out of date), so 970 was eliminated.

So 98 models are only suitable for 870.

If you don't mind the old models, the three models in 2007 are also good, and the price is more cost-effective. Their respective characteristics are as follows

960, the image quality of large CCD is more guaranteed.

950, the performance is the same as 860 but cheaper.

Both the 860 and the 8-prefix have large LCD screens with wide-angle fashion, and they are the evaluation champions of the production year like the 870 (of course, if they are at the same price, choose 870).

Finally, 870 is a good IXUS. It is impossible to say that a sport can't be filmed clearly (others will listen to it as a joke). LZ, don't worry.