Task-driven Composition Classics (2)

Chapter 5: Quality Inspection in Fuzhou

18. Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required.

In order to urge students to study, Teacher Jiao of a vocational and technical college came up with a "new trick" to send red envelopes with WeChat after class, giving red envelopes to students with high attendance, good academic performance and serious classes. As soon as this move came out, none of his students skipped classes, the classroom atmosphere was active and the relationship between teachers and students became better. As soon as the news came out, the teachers and students of the school agreed, feeling that this practice was very innovative. After the media reported, it caused controversy. Some parents explicitly oppose the teacher's practice and think that using "money" to guide students to attend classes will make children utilitarian and make education tasteless.

What do you think of the above matter? Please express your attitude and views on the performance of teachers, students or parents.

It is required to synthesize the content and significance of the material, choose a good angle, determine the train of thought and complete the writing task.

"Red envelope reward" reflects the vulgarization of education.

Red envelopes, translated as lucky money, are quite lucky. In the traditional customs of China, they are used as gifts from elders to younger generations in the New Year celebrations, and there is also polite communication between hosts and guests. In today's "internet plus" era, the red envelope is no longer just a rough little red paper bag, but a virtual picture in the WeChat window, and you can get the pleasure of the red envelope with a flick of your finger.

When such an entertaining red envelope was named as an artifact by Jiaozuo, a teacher in a university in Jiangsu Province, I admired his ability to capture the curiosity and profit-seeking psychology of vocational college students, and I was deeply saddened by the fact that teachers' way was reduced to pleasing students first in exchange for the stability of teaching order. When students leave Man Qin, their grades will improve, and they will celebrate festivals ... They can all get a red envelope prize from Jiao, no matter what the gold is, but in the end they can get a harmonious and happy scene where his class is packed and the relationship between teachers and apprentices is warming up. But take away its grandiose appearance, and all that remains is "I will pay you to attend, and I will give you a red envelope to change your mind". How valuable is this new trick in teaching? What kind of willingness to learn is reflected by students grabbing red envelopes and leaving Man Qin?

"Red envelopes" are originally "courtesy is light and affection is heavy", and we use them to express our blessings in life. Teacher Jiao keeps pace with the times and "seduces" students. His good intentions are worthy of recognition, but using red envelopes to stimulate and tease students is to lure students' desire for money from another angle. It is an obligation for students to attend classes and study hard, but now it is linked to the rich color of money, which is unfair to those students who really read good books, because their original pure knowledge is now infected with greed because of the teacher's practice.

Naming artifacts such as "WeChat Sign-in", "Face Brush Artifact" and "Photo Taking" emerge one after another. While netizens are teasing and amusing, they also arouse our deep thoughts: At present, students' thirst for knowledge can only be stimulated by money? And where should the dignity of teachers go? These seemingly innovative measures have impacted the thought of respecting teachers and valuing Taoism in traditional culture, and also unconsciously belittled themselves. As soon as the red envelope is issued, the dignity of the teacher is gone.

But in fact, I believe that Jiaofa WeChat red envelope is really helpless. "I haven't learned from you for a long time." Skipping classes has become a common practice for many college students, and it is not surprising that the style of study has deteriorated. It is not a case that you are tired of learning and addicted to electronic products when you should be the best age to explore and think in life. Therefore, it is even more difficult for teachers who are burdened with the burden of "wanting others without being confused". It seems reasonable to send red envelopes to please students and become "beauty teachers" and "goddess teachers" to attract students, but it is indeed a manifestation of vulgarization of educational means. In this way, a vicious circle is formed between students and teachers, and the final result is the decline of education.

To change the present situation and correct the bad style of work, from the root, educators should strive to improve teaching methods, teach students in accordance with their aptitude and pay attention to practice, so that students can truly love learning and truly feel the sense of enrichment and pleasure in acquiring knowledge. Scholars should also establish correct values, respect teachers and respect knowledge.

There is no room for heavy knowledge in the red envelope, and knowledge does not need the outer packaging of the red envelope. As a symbol of custom, red envelopes should be cherished and used; As the filling of individual soul, knowledge should be respected and admired. Teachers' dignity in the new era should be jointly safeguarded by teachers and students. (1000 words)

Chapter six: Guangdong simulation questions

18. Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required. (60 points)

Recently, a student from a school spoke online: the scholarship is only one yuan, so it is better not to play. Just 1 yuan, I think it is better not to send it. Only a few people a year. It should have been cancelled a long time ago.

The reporter learned that this year's scholarship amount was changed to a symbolic one yuan, plus a certificate of honor; The school will transfer the total amount of cancelled scholarships to the "Poverty Alleviation Fund" account. The school explained that students are expected to study hard and not take "how much bonus to get" as the learning goal.

This incident has attracted the attention of some netizens, and after being reported by the media, it has caused a wider range and more angles of discussion.

The two columns of the school newspaper, "Voice of Students" and "Advice to the Principal", specifically discussed this matter. Please choose a column to contribute, show your attitude and explain your point of view.

It is required to synthesize the content and significance of the material, choose a good angle, determine the concept, clarify the style and draw up a good title; Don't copy, don't copy.

A certain scholarship can give us a sense of gain.

-Writing for the column "The Voice of Students"

Scholarship changed from a small pile of paper money to one yuan, which may be caused by sad people, angry people, people who have nothing to say, and people who gloat.

The school has its own reasons for making such a decision: Do you study hard just to "grab" the scholarship? Obviously not. To put it mildly, we students study to enrich our lives with knowledge and improve ourselves with skills; Even if it is secular, it is to have a good future and "have money and leisure" in the future, and it will never be short-sighted to the point where "everything depends on scholarships".

Moreover, the school's "one-yuan scholarship" is neither a helpless move because of economic difficulties nor a stingy trip. Do you think our scholarship is not used as the principal of our "poverty alleviation fund" Isn't it good to help students who need money more?

But wait a minute, while affirming the motivation of the school, we should also see that this move has its shortcomings and is worth discussing.

Although it is revealed on the Internet that it is inappropriate for students in our school to vomit, "it is better not to fight" is too short-sighted and utilitarian, and "only a few people get it every year" shows sour jealousy, which is either a temporary anger or an incorrect view. However, "I think 1 yuan is better than not" does have some merits. Students should aim high, but setting periodic and short-term goals will really help us keep our motivation and keep moving forward. Scholarships can be one of the short-term goals. Of course, scholarships with too high a sum are easy to encourage the unhealthy trend of utilitarianism and intensify the "contradictions among the people" among students who are arrogant and scum; But if the amount is too low, on the surface, you reward the winner. In fact, it makes them feel perfunctory, but there will be a sense of loss with a big gap between pay and return. A proper amount of scholarship will make the winners feel the benefits (it is a joke to say that one yuan is "affordable" in today's high prices), and it will also make the losers have a balanced mentality and don't care about jealousy. This is an important "livelihood project" that gives students a sense of gain. As for what is the "right amount", it is self-evident that it can be discussed separately.

As for the "poverty alleviation fund", it is also related to the "sense of gain" and is conducive to promoting "social equity." The "precise poverty alleviation" for poor students varies from person to person, and the amount is higher than that of scholarships. However, I think that when schools "strengthen poverty alleviation", they should not transfer all scholarship budgets to poverty alleviation grants. Award-winning learning belongs to award-winning learning, and poverty alleviation belongs to poverty alleviation. Although the two methods are the same, they have different functions and properties and cannot be biased.

In a word, we don't just study for money, we need a considerable amount of knowledge and a certain sense of "gain" to get a boost from it without being vulgar and short-sighted. What's wrong with a medium scholarship? (880 words)

Chapter 7: Quanzhou simulation problem

18. Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required. (60 points)

At five o'clock every afternoon, an old couple will move stools near Nanjing Yancang Bridge, and "human flesh" will occupy the parking space, waiting for their children to drive home. If the child comes back late, take turns sitting until the child comes back.

In response to this matter, the parties reacted differently. Some people sigh that they are poor and bear the wind; The owner nearby was angry and helpless: this is a public parking space, not his private parking space, but he can't do anything to two people, can he? The children of the old couple are also very wronged: the parking spaces nearby are really too tight, but they also advise their parents not to be so rain or shine, but they can't beat the two old people.

What do you think of these things? Please show your attitude and your opinion on the performance of a person or a group of people. Please combine the content and meaning of the material, choose a good angle, determine the concept, draw up your own topic, and don't copy it.

Give warm understanding within a certain limit.

An old couple in Nanjing "human flesh" occupied the parking space and waited for their children to come back from work, which made the nearby cars angry and helpless. This incident also caused different social reactions. I think we should give China's parents a warm understanding within a certain limit.

The couple's children once advised their parents not to rain or shine, but the result was that they could not beat the two old people. At this time, we can't look at this event with "no quality" and "selfish" eyes, because it involves the most sincere feelings in the world-fatherly love and maternal love. We should give understanding and let this care moisten to the end.

It is an indisputable fact that the competition in today's society is fierce and the pressure is increasing sharply. Support the elderly, children, work and socialize, etc. Let today's young people shoulder heavier responsibilities. Parents see it in their eyes, but it hurts in their hearts. In order to reduce the pressure on children, parents can also do their best. This is why the parents in the outer ring of Beijing took the bus for the women's volleyball team whose children were still at work at 4 am, and spontaneously went to the park to give their children a blind date. Now, "human flesh" has occupied a place.

This group of parents is not unreasonable. They didn't illegally charge others to occupy space, and they didn't deliberately disturb the order. They are doing their duty. Children are so hard and tired, how can these parents eat melon seeds and watch TV at home with peace of mind and let exhausted young people find parking spaces? Therefore, it is an act from the heart. You should see its bright side to encourage yourself and feel the warmth that someone cares about, instead of treating this incident with a surprised attitude. In fact, there are no serious consequences.

Of course, the contradiction is by no means groundless, and it must have its internal causes. For example, does this expose the poor management of parking spaces in this community? Can a parking lot be built to solve the practical difficulties of residents? Relevant departments should conduct on-the-spot investigation to see what the incident has revealed.

Although parents' feelings need to be understood, the premise is that they can do whatever they want within certain limits, especially within the limits of the law, rather than in the name of supreme feelings. It is absolutely intolerable to forge a passport for a child to go abroad and use his position to pave the way for the child. Holding the banner of affection is actually tarnishing this white banner.

This time, there is nothing unusual about the parents' "human flesh" occupation. On the contrary, it can warm people's hearts and promote the handling of related matters. Therefore, within a certain limit, we should give warm understanding. (760 words, with deletion)

Chapter 8: Fuzhou simulation questions

18. Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required. (60 points)

The Taiwan Province Philharmonic Orchestra performed in a city in Chinese mainland, and the subtitles of "Please don't take pictures or record during the performance" were constantly played on both sides of the venue. During the performance, many viewers were infected by the wonderful performance and took pictures of the recording. The staff who maintain order in the venue will use a laser pen to directly illuminate anyone who violates the rules. Some of the audience who were photographed were consciously indefensible, some became angry from embarrassment, and the order at the scene was good or bad. After the performance, Weibo, the official of the Philharmonic Orchestra, posted a post saying that audiences who don't respect art are not welcome.

What do you think of the above matter? As a netizen, please comment on the performance of the Philharmonic Orchestra, the audience or the staff, show your attitude and expound your views.

It is required to synthesize the content and significance of the material, choose a good angle, determine the train of thought and complete the writing task. Personal information shall not be disclosed.

Laser beam is contrary to the improvement of public artistic literacy.

When the Philharmonic Orchestra performed in Chinese mainland, it not only printed subtitles on both sides of the venue, but even used such barbaric means as "direct laser beam" to prohibit the audience from taking photos and recording, but it had little effect. I think the reason is that the head of the orchestra didn't think of this phenomenon, but blocked the downstream and didn't manage it from the source.

Why do viewers "risk their lives to commit crimes against the wind"? After all, I enjoyed the performance. Otherwise, why do such a thankless thing? Therefore, Philharmonic's handling method is too tough, losing the audience's face, and it is very likely to smash its own venue.

However, why do mainland audiences still refuse to change their minds even if such tough measures are taken? I think the reason is very complicated.

The first is the audience's respect for art, or their understanding level is not high. The audience confused the concepts of art and entertainment and made no distinction. In Taiwan Province Province or western developed countries, symphony is regarded as a sacred and solemn elegant art, and it is listened to by many people who know and really love symphony. They don't think music is too high and too little, and they are willing to respect music and musicians in a quiet way. However, among mainland audiences, the proportion of such bosom friends may not be too large. How many people compete for the title of "Taiwan Province Philharmonic Orchestra", and how many people come to "upgrade" themselves. They may think it's pleasing to the ear, but they don't realize the difference between symphony and concert. For them, this is all entertainment. Entertainment should be recorded and shared with friends.

What about China's national inferiority in the transitional period? China people's habit of disobeying the rules and the public's luck are just another collective performance this time. A person crossing the road and listening to the symphony may honestly obey the traffic rules and listen quietly; When a group of people get together, there will be a magnificent scene of "crossing the road in Chinese style" and a "grand occasion" in which shutter sound and screen light are all over the audience. No wonder the staff came up with this strategy.

I think that if Philharmonic really wants to create a good performance atmosphere, it should consider and deal with it from the audience's thinking, instead of saying that "the audience who don't respect art is unpopular" and leave no feelings for people. This attitude of "high and low" will only push the mainland audience farther away from the symphony, which is contrary to the meaning of music existence and will hinder the popularization of symphony among the people.

If I am the head of the orchestra, before each performance, I will stand in the center of the stage in a formal suit and popularize the common sense of symphony to the audience in a gentle but powerful tone, so that the audience can understand the influence of photographic recording on the performers. Moreover, in the words of famous artists: "Real music is heard with ears and felt with heart."

With the influx of western classical music into China, more and more children in China began to learn western musical instruments, and people's ideas are bound to keep pace with the times. Treat the symphony, there will be a deeper understanding and more sincere respect. Take out the laser pointer and lead the public to the dawn of art with gentle eyes. (940 words)

Chapter 9: Xiamen Quality Inspection in March

18. Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required. (60 points)

Xiao Wang was born in a big family. Every holiday, the elders will call family gatherings, but Xiao Wang is not interested in it and often can't find an excuse. The elders are very unhappy, and Xiao Wang is also very upset. Nowadays, many families are facing similar situations, and the "Your Family" column of the local evening news has launched a heated discussion on this.

What do you think of these things? Please write a letter to Xiao Wang or Xiao Wang's parents, or contribute to the column "Family Affairs" to show your attitude and explain your views.

It is required to synthesize the content and significance of the material, choose a good angle, determine the train of thought and complete the writing task. If you write a letter, you should use "Yiping" as the writer, and you should not disclose personal information; If you contribute, please write down your own title.

Feelings of home and country come from family ties.

Who would have thought that the patriarchal clan system would become the focus of controversy today after several generations? Family gatherings held by the elders on holidays have become the distress of the younger generation. Its essence is the decline of traditional culture, and young people are losing their roots.

Indeed, family gatherings have existed since ancient times, and people who don't want to attend them have existed since ancient times. Now the controversy has undoubtedly caused waves, because this controversy has become a social problem. As a young man, I can fully understand Xiao Wang's feelings-faced with a series of direct questions from a group of elders I am not familiar with about my studies, career and marriage, I will inevitably feel at a loss; Moreover, in today's population migration is so easy, the clan foundation in various regions, especially in the Central Plains, has long been weakened and replaced by people of the same clan who are scattered all over the country and drifting away from each other. It's not easy to get together, what's more, the atmosphere is very cold when they get together. Xiao Wang's distress does have its basis.

However, it is worth noting that the time for elders to hold family gatherings is on holidays. The traditional festivals in China since ancient times have two purposes: remembering ancestors and celebrating family reunion. When everyone is lamenting that "the taste of the year has faded", family gatherings are undoubtedly the biggest source of fever that exudes a reunion atmosphere. Secondly, from the historical origin, it is not difficult to find that nationality is an important division of population, both in the world and in countries or regions. It is precisely because of the long-term historical formation process and the protection of legal provisions that an invisible bond has been consciously formed within the nation, so the stability and continuation of the nation is natural and reasonable; Similarly, the derivatives that make up nations and families also have the rationality of their historical existence. Just as the "surname" exists, it is basically to consolidate the intimate relationship of the family. Furthermore, back to reality, the current family system is not as gloomy, patriarchal and hierarchical as it was in ancient times. More often, it only depends on blood relationship and some strong ideology-the deep concern of elders for future generations. The author believes that this is something that Xiao Wang should admit. Therefore, from all angles, it is not difficult to draw a conclusion that Xiao Wang's behavior first ignores that the family is the basis of almost all traditional behaviors, and secondly underestimates the universal value of the clan system.

As mentioned earlier, there are many young people like Wang Yi, which may lead to social disputes. The author believes that although the traditional family concept is indeed quite reasonable, it is inevitable that it will eventually form a fault in time if it is not accepted by young people.

To this end, in addition to exerting verbal pressure on Xiao Wang through parents and elders, it is better to let young people stop boycotting family gatherings in other gentler ways. Guiding him to learn and understand the family and its evolution in history should be the first step, followed by calmly guiding him to remember the good feelings that the family once brought him; More importantly, we should have the family care that this era should have, and be caring and attentive from the heart.

As a new generation represented by Xiao Wang, even Xiao Wang, only by truly understanding the universal value of family can he finally rise to the national level, have a "home" and finally have the feelings of home and country that are most needed in this era. (1050 words)

Article 10: Quanzhou Quality Inspection in March

Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required.

Sinderen, a graduate of Yale University, established the Sinderen Award of Yale University on 1957 to encourage students to collect books. In the competition of 1963, the first prize was awarded to a student who collected books such as Train Timebook, while broschi, who collected 200 works by the famous writer Faulkner and books related to Faulkner, won the second place. Broschi later became a famous bibliophile. He donated his books to Southeast Missouri State University instead of Yale University.

What do you think of these things? Please indicate your attitude and views on the practice of Yale University or broschi.

It is required to synthesize the content and significance of the material, choose a good angle, determine the concept, clarify the style, draw up the title by yourself and complete the writing task; Don't copy, don't copy.

The spirit of collecting books transcends the dispute over names.

1963, Yale University's "Schindler's Book Collection Award" was unexpected, and it favored the collectors of train time manuals, making broschi, who collected and studied more than 200 Faulkner's works, rank second. Although the latter is famous, it is difficult to explain. Naturally, broschi's antipathy is not unreasonable. But in my opinion, in doing so, universities just want to make the scope of book collection more open, give more tolerance to the names of books, encourage the behavior of book collection, and make the spirit of book collection deeply rooted in people's hearts.

What kind of books to collect depends on everyone's interest, but book collectors are persistent about similar goals. No matter what you collect, it has the same meaning: through the collection of similar text works, in terms of the depth of time and the breadth of content, you can study a certain kind of things by means of overall analysis, comparison and arrangement. If measured by this point, the train timetable and Faulkner's works are on an equal footing. After all, the train time manual "out of people's sight" can witness the development of trains, the changes of cities and even the changes of people's production and life from a special perspective. The distribution of time, the number of stops, the distance traveled, etc. can all reflect the rise of trains as a means of transportation, and then they are slightly inferior to new tools, changes in urban transportation networks in different years, and so on. In view of the rarity and completeness of information, its value in the eyes of urban planning researchers will never be lower than Faulkner's works in the eyes of literary researchers.

Why in the eyes of most people, winning the train timetable has become an "accident"? People's criticism is influenced by the value of books. Faulkner's works-the painstaking creation of a writer-will certainly be more cherished than the readily available train timetable. However, the "Xin Deren" book collection award is not awarded to the person who collects books, but to the person who collects books: he sees the value of the train timetable that you ignore, he is willing to make efforts and thoughts to collect these pamphlets and keep them properly, and he even insists on his hobbies in laughter that others don't understand; So he has reason to win the championship, and he is entitled to be fully affirmed by a bibliophile.

"Taishan does not let the soil, so it can become big; Rivers and seas do not choose small streams, so they can become deep. " For countless books and book collectors, the book collection award is such an ocean that must accommodate hundreds of rivers. It was not established to judge and comment on the pros and cons; Instead, we should carry forward the behavior and spirit of collecting books, encourage more people to study, and be an information master in a certain field in this era of information explosion. Its ranking is not for collectors to compete, not to give them a final conclusion about the value of their collections, but to let more people see the elegance of different collections.

Might as well be a little more tolerant of the title. Book collection, as a hobby, has different tastes, and it is diversity that enriches it; As a profession, different fields have their own needs, and it is richness that makes it possible to make contributions in various fields. (940 words)