Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - The difference between the definition of team and gang

The difference between the definition of team and gang

1. Gang: refers to two or more people who organize together for a certain purpose, and calculate each other for this purpose, and then break up after achieving the goal.

2. Group: act according to one's own conscience and combine with each other in a bad environment, each for its own benefit; Such as tour groups

3. Team: Give to each other for a goal, then overcome this goal together, support each other and never give up.

1. Gang: Personally, it is a short-term behavior, and the embodiment of personal heroism should not exist in modern enterprises. Such individuals and events should be eliminated in enterprises;

2. Group: Personally, this is not a good phenomenon for the development of enterprises. This kind of organization has insufficient binding force and loose organizational discipline. If this kind of individual and phenomenon is also unfavorable to the enterprise in the enterprise;

3. Team: I personally think that it is to integrate organized and disciplined small groups into a big team, grow together, create greater wealth together, and reach the top in one step.

As a member of an enterprise, where would you like to stand in a gang, group or team? Is it to be a hero? Is it necessary to be an undisciplined tour group? Or do you want to be a member of a team dedicated to common goals, overcoming them together, supporting each other and never giving up?

On the surface, teams and gangs are groups composed of several people, and their purpose is to achieve the same goal. But the fundamental difference is that the potential driving forces of the people who make up these two groups are different. This gang is driven by pure interests. Once the benefits are taken away, the gang will be dissolved immediately. A good team is usually driven by vision. Everyone in the team has a sense of mission. Even if there is no immediate benefit, the team will move forward firmly. But now there is a strange phenomenon. For the bosses and decision makers of some enterprises, there are many problems in the actual management of teams and gangs, which leads to a series of contradictions in the company. Many bosses regard employees' frequent overtime work day and night as a way to measure the quality of a company team. The more overtime, the later. It is considered a matter of conscience and a contribution to the company. This is a somewhat cooperative team. I don't know that employees don't work overtime because they don't finish their daily work. Enterprises assign more extra homework, which is not intentional resources to work overtime, but what the boss thinks is the performance of this excellent team. There are more company performance indicators as a pillar to measure the quality of a team. No matter whether employees are alive or dead, as long as the team with good performance fails to reach the goal, it is all kinds of fines and so on. But is this really the definition of a good team? Who understands what kind of talents can be called a real enterprise team?

The following is an analysis of the above discussion, so how to distinguish teams from gangs? The following points will make you see the truth clearly.

China has a saying that there are not many soldiers but good ones; This is the essence of team building. Many times, not many people work hard, but everyone has the same goal and the team does not distinguish between you and me. Some are the core strength of the team working hard to achieve common goals. It is normal for the team to have differences, which shows that everyone is wise, not only the executors, but also the marginal decision makers. Everyone has the same goal and believes that the power of throwing stones is infinite.

As the saying goes, without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang. Yes, no matter for a business or a family, there are some "rules" of their own. However, at present, more and more rules formulated by enterprises are implemented by others, which makes the "rules" that make most people uncomfortable in enterprises often get twice the result with half the effort. For some small enterprises, more and more enterprises make rules for people who leave. What's more, more and more enterprises make rules that directly force people to leave. Therefore, the established rules must be recognized by most team members. For some small enterprises, the rules can be formulated by everyone, which is both compliant and comfortable, and can also bring certain benefits to enterprises. Lie down if you get caught.

In fact, we know a word from the beginning of school, study hard and make progress every day. A successful team must be a proactive team. A team is like a production line, one link after another, and there is no room for any mistakes in that joint. An inactive team will eventually be eliminated by the enterprise. A good team not only works actively, but also has positive learning motivation. No one wants to hold the team back and have a positive attitude. More often, a young job seeker is willing to join a stormy small company, take risks and share weal and woe with the company, largely because he agrees with this team.

In fact, the real team is to achieve common goals, sacrifice the ego to complete the ego, complain less, pay more and realize self-worth. On the contrary, when companies are unilaterally squeezing, customizing endless rules, managing more and more things, doing less and less, and pursuing overtime, is such a company a team or a gang? This is not a case. I believe many business managers are also pondering this issue. Why is it so difficult to keep people now? Why do employees always complain? Is it an employee problem or an enterprise problem? Is the enterprise a team or a gang?