Joke video of migrant workers eating buffet

Couples should pack if they can't finish their buffet. The clerk was no longer told: I spent money.

The couple's buffet should be packed if they can't finish eating. The clerk stopped being robbed: I spent money. Maybe in the eyes of customers, there is nothing wrong with taking care of my children and I don't have time to eat, but I ordered it and threw it away if I didn't eat it. He felt that he didn't take more, but took his share. If you really don't want to waste, you can eat. This is no reason to pack.

If you can't finish eating the couple buffet, you should pack it, and the clerk should not rob it again: I spent 1, that is, after the "CD Action", in order to avoid food waste, China also promulgated the "Anti-Food Waste Law" to practice economy, and packaging can be seen everywhere when eating out.

On June 14, the media reported that a couple in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province wanted to pack after dinner, but they were stopped by the clerk, causing a quarrel. One of the men even tried to dump the food to vent his anger. As we all know, saving food is a virtue, but after the reason was exposed, netizens voiced for the store one after another-never seen a buffet to be packaged!

Pack if you can't finish the buffet.

The clerk stopped the conflict.

"I don't want to eat, you don't want to pack, my things have been dumped!" In the restaurant, a man said angrily, and then went to the dining table, trying to dump the food, but fortunately he was held by a woman in the same trade. The other diners in the restaurant were dumbfounded. Why do they quarrel at dinner?

The above scene took place in a canteen in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province on June 13. On the day of the incident, a couple took their children to a restaurant for dinner. After the meal time, the man proposed to pack the unfinished steak on the table.

Eat less and eat more to avoid waste. If there is too much food left, you need to deduct money, and packing is not allowed. This is basically the rule of every cafeteria, so the man's request for packing was immediately rejected by the service staff.

The couple were a little excited about the failure of the negotiation. I can't eat freely, and I haven't eaten steak. Why not pack it? Then there was a dispute between the two sides, and the whole restaurant was filled with angry words from men.

"Is there a problem with my packing here?"

Want to dump food to vent their anger.

I don't want to waste food

In the online video, the man in gray pushed away the black staff who calmed his emotions and pointed to the table where he had just eaten: "I don't have to eat steak. I sat with the children. Is there a problem with my packing here? "

The women in the same trade are also very angry. She put her handbag on her arm, took out her mobile phone and said, "I don't want to pack now, I want to call and complain!" "

The staff in black quickly appeased, but the effect was little. The woman said, "What do you mean, it's unnecessary?"

The man in gray waved his hand and said that he didn't eat and didn't need to pack. He had to throw it all away. Hearing this, the woman immediately stepped forward and hugged him, pulling him aside: "What's the matter with you? Waste food, you know? We don't want to waste food when packing, so it's not necessary. "

Subsequently, the man in gray was persuaded to one side, and others came forward to appease. I think the conflict will come to an end when the mood is stable.

In the conflict, the woman's words explained the original intention of the couple's packaging-they didn't want to waste it. That's a good idea, but I chose the cafeteria.

The couple's buffet was about to be packed, but the clerk stopped: I spent money. Looking at the children running around to watch the fun, I feel that the couple's approach is a bit demanding. It also played a bad leading role. Because they broke the rules.

Maybe in the eyes of customers, they are not wrong. They take care of the children and have no time to eat, but they order food and throw it away if they don't eat. He felt that he didn't take more. He took his share. Do not waste.

Not wasting is a virtue, and it is also advocated by the state. But when used in the canteen, as a reason for packaging, it feels a bit like shouting slogans.

If you really don't want to waste, you can eat. This is no reason to pack. Even the leftovers, how to deal with them, the right is in the restaurant, not the individual.

The reason is naturally, according to this logic, if everyone takes more and then packs it, the business is estimated to go bankrupt.

Personally, for this matter, we should support the merchants, and the buffet rules do not allow packaging. If both husband and wife don't understand at first, they should take the initiative to stop after persuasion.

Therefore, businessmen are easy to discuss, afraid of making a big mess, being treated as a soft persimmon, and being scolded without martial arts. After all, there are no rules that can make Fiona Fang. This kind of customer who directly ignores the rules and only cares about his own ideas is a bit of a rogue.

It seems to be justified, but in fact it is violating the minimum rules.

Since you want to save, you should save less. If there is a small accident, such as the doll suddenly making trouble, you can explain it with the merchant to avoid the practice of deducting money because you didn't eat too much leftovers. After all, this responsibility is the customer's own, and businesses can't take the blame.

On the other hand, make a fuss and the packaging is unreasonable.

Of course, this seems to be a farce. In fact, it also reflects the individual's lack of empathy, that is, not only from their own perspective, but also from each other's perspective.

The truth is right relative to oneself, and now others are not necessarily right. This is actually the role of rules, and rules cannot be ignored.