After Russia liberated serfs, why did the people cheer for the czar? Is it sustainable? Why?

To give a simple example, why did China never add fu to the imperial edict promulgated by Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty? When Qianlong was in power, he ordered tax reduction and exemption, and the people cheered. Because they have long been at the bottom of the deprived and oppressed society. Therefore, just like a master giving a dog a whip and a piece of candy, we should look at historical issues from the perspective of politicians. The whip should not have been borne by the bottom people. The wool is on the sheep, just to give it a smile. Remember, it's a smiling face, not sugar!

Similarly, in Russia in the17th century, serfs at that time should not be slaves. In terms of legal effect, serfs should have personal freedom, movable property and immovable property rights. Land originally belongs to the people, and the people have the right to participate in the management of government affairs, and the people have the right to take the initiative in industry and commerce.

So, to sum up, what Alexander II did was just to hide his eyes and ears and change his mind. There is continuity, but from the April Revolution, we can see that the actual system and system are imperfect. To some extent, the reform of 186 1 was only to accommodate the interests of most nobles and landlords, thus moderately sacrificing the interests of serfs.

Comrade Lenin said: the reform of 186 1 is another joke in history. This sentence is not comprehensive, but it can also reflect its substantive problems, but isn't it a fact that it lasts for 50 years?