Is epidemic prevention in Shanghai a joke?

I thought that after suffering for so long, with the joint efforts of the people and medical staff, Shanghai could finally be unsealed. But I didn't expect the group rent to become an epidemic prevention black hole. It is reported that the owner of Taide Garden in Xuhui District, Shanghai took the initiative to feedback to reporters that there were many households renting in the community during the epidemic. Only 100 flat two-bedroom,1/room, 30 tenants, of which 15 infected COVID-19. However, this phenomenon is very common in Ted Garden. As an excellent city, Shanghai has such loopholes, mainly due to the incomplete implementation of epidemic prevention and lack of management.

The focus has once again returned to the group rental in Ted Garden. After the incident, the person in charge of the community industry Committee even said that there are many offices of merchants and private enterprises in the community, so they don't know the existence of group living. Such evasive remarks made netizens feel chilling. You know, during the epidemic, the first infected person who exploded in Ted Garden was just one of the tenants. And there are two high-rise buildings in the community, of which nearly 8 households are all rented in groups, and each household has at least 10 people. Such a large-scale group rent, as the person in charge of the industry Committee, how could you not know?

In addition, since April 2022, although the permanent population of Ted Garden is about 1 000, the number of infected people has exceeded 1 000, and such high-risk data cannot be taken seriously. There is even feedback from the owners. During the epidemic, many tenants in the group had no epidemic prevention at home, and even left their doors open and walked around at will. Such a small space is crowded with a large number of people. Once it is positive, it may be inevitable for the whole community. This irresponsible behavior has increased the pressure of epidemic prevention and control.

However, the lessor is also at fault. As early as 20 14 years, there were clear housing rental regulations, which had obvious requirements for living area and number of residents. However, in order to seek benefits, the owner rented the apartment of 100 to1/tenant, regardless of security risks and rental regulations. This situation not only has a fire hazard, but also increases the spread of the virus in today's epidemic prevention and control, which is irresponsible to oneself and indifferent to the lives of others.