Is it a fool to brush gifts for the anchor?

It's actually recognition. If you like it, express your thoughts.

Just like when we finished playing pirated games to make up the original tickets-this game is fun and my sincerity touched me. I hope this production company or producer can make more and better works, so I am willing to spend money to support it. In essence, this money represents a kind of recognition and support.

The same is true of gifts in the live broadcast room. Some people say that I won't brush gifts for the anchor anyway, and all those who brush gifts are mentally ill. This kind of person is the same as those who have played pirated versions. Judge for yourself whether it is right or wrong.

The thanks in the anchor's mouth should be pure thanks, not rewards. The live content that can meet the needs of the audience is the real reward, which is also the product purchased by the audience who consume in the live broadcast room.

To put it bluntly, a gift is a reward, such as songs, dances, jokes, knowledge, relaxation, superiority, pride, carefree feeling and so on. It is also a kind of support for the anchor. In addition to a few well-known local tyrants, there are so many fools who can feel the pleasure from a thank you.

So why do big anchors almost never ask for gifts, but they can earn millions a month, while some small anchors selling meat are still cold when begging? In the final analysis, the former does not treat the audience as fools and knows why he is talented; The latter is full of opportunistic ideas. He really thinks that his peers make money because they are lucky and meet a stupid and rich local tyrant.

The relationship between the anchor and the audience is actually the relationship between consumers and product producers. It is just not used in the traditional value-for-money relationship. The price of the products produced by the anchor is determined by the audience's own consumption ability and consumption concept. This is why there are thousands of local tyrants brushing gifts, and some people are penniless. Let's just say that our world is really different.

To be honest, consumer users spend money to provide economic support for the anchor's continuous content output.

People who watch the live broadcast without spending a penny or paying attention should be grateful. As for the sprayer, they think watching the live broadcast is already a great contribution. In fact, we all know that they will only destroy other people's viewing experience. This is more obvious now that the heat value replaces the popularity value.

For a similar example, this is similar to street performers in the past. Rich people hold money fields, and people without money hold personal fields.

Some people left after the show. On the contrary, they say that those who recognize and reward others' performance are stupid.

You are also the smartest. You don't spend a penny watching the performance for nothing. You don't know how to respect other people's work. All you think about is self-interest People like you are not stupid. People like you are bad, bad to the bone.