What is the movie "The Great Protector" that reviews the rise of the country?

First conclusion: four stars, it is recommended to watch, it is worth buying a ticket.

What Guo Man lacks most is still the ability to tell good stories.

There are two kinds of movies that are not easy to write reviews, even if they have no technical content.

One is a very good movie, full of surprises and profound enough to be extended everywhere, but "Duran Peanut" doesn't know where to start; One is mediocre performance, and there is nothing too good or worth complaining about. I want to say a few words, but I don't think it's necessary. I want to scold a few words, but it seems not enough.

"The Great Protector" is a little close to the latter, but it is really remarkable in terms of modeling design and the story itself. Coupled with feelings for the country, it is not too much to play four stars.

After reading the 3D version of Mandarin, it may be because Dafa is short and fat, and his image is not realistic. It's very second-dimensional and animated, so the dubbing is full of drama.

That's all. After all, it's just personal likes and dislikes.

Most other aspects are well-behaved, such as music and pictures. At first glance, it's actually a little fresh. The stick figure style, background and details of Peanut Man are almost rough. Compared with the increasingly exquisite, complex and three-dimensional animation picture, it has a strong simplicity.

3D is dispensable, not particularly dependent on 3D special effects works; It's not brilliant to chase and fight. Anyway, it's either "almost" or "I can't die if I can't beat it". It doesn't make sense to repeat it several times. These two aspects may be somewhat limited by the simplicity of painting style. The images of both sides are not suitable for complicated movements and fighting scenes, and special effects that violate harmony cannot be added. In the end, they are useless.

In terms of sense of humor, it can be seen that the director did not deliberately pursue "funny", and several places that caused laughter were natural and slightly cold. In terms of inner OS, it should be: neuropathy. ...

For example, the prince has a rough face and a literary background, which makes people feel a bit "funny" and caters to the rebellious psychology of modern people.

What is the perfect protagonist who is rich, talented and handsome? Reality is not a fairy tale at all No flaw is the biggest flaw. The audience wants to see the characters that are more real and closer to themselves, and recognize the plot logic that is closest to real life-this is psychology.

Or not so complicated. Everyone wants to see something new.

"The Great Protector" is really fresh. The protagonist, the red wax gourd, has a special shape, high recognition, and is beautiful and lovely. At first I was wondering what species it was. Later, it was found that people have legs, and they are human, but they are short and fat into triangles. But such people dub seriously and play the role of a master. The contrast suddenly came out. He is cute or not, and people have different opinions. There is no doubt about the classicality of the character image.

The background of this story is quite interesting. A bunch of strange peanut people who seem to be unable to talk are cheated and live a huge lie. They don't know what they are, and they don't know the truth of life. They are just containers waiting for harvest when they are mature.

In order to bring the prince hiding in Peanut Man's territory back to China, the Great Protector came to this strange place, and then the Great Protector, the prince and the awakened Huajiang went hand in hand, which promoted the development of the story. Finally, more and more peanut people wake up to their self-awareness, admit their true colors, rejoin the ranks, and collectively unite to fight back against the big boss behind the scenes.

In fact, the brain hole and styling design are good, and the story is relatively complete, but I don't know why, there is always a sense of loss after reading it. In the final analysis, it is because "I can't tell stories with the lens."

The story itself is flawed, and the most obvious point is the lack of tension. If a protagonist can't die after being shot, the "good guy" can survive every time he encounters danger. It should have been the climax of the big BOSS's decisive battle for three or two times ... This practice of slashing the suspense of fighting with a big knife and adding a halo to the protagonist can basically be regarded as giving up the eight-character evaluation of "ups and downs, gripping".

The conflict between Prince Edward, Jiang, Guo Mao and Anji is a bit like a stage play. Each character stands out in turn, and each has a short "close-up" to describe the character. But judging from their opposing identities and crucial plot nodes, this passage is really peaceful and unreasonable. It can be seen that the director cares more about the shaping of roles and the expression of opinions than creating an atmosphere and climax.

"The Great Protector" can not win in the rhythm plot, but pay attention to metaphor and connotation, which causes the audience to think more deeply, but this is still based on "telling a good story".

Relying too much on narration to supplement explanation is the most common performance of telling stories without taking the camera. Every line that makes the character jump out of the role itself and introduce the "status quo" to the audience is creating embarrassment; Every lyric that doesn't conform to the character and speaking style is redundant.

Apart from these little embarrassments, the three lines are too scattered and too direct. After careful review and analysis, the narrative has no skills, no mistakes, but no bright spots.

If you really want to get to the bottom of me, "why do you say that?" I thought about it again and again, and the sense of emptiness may be because each character is like the protagonist in his own world. Several worlds overlap each other, but they are not worthy of being integrated with one master and the second time.

The big protector's task is to protect the prince, so he looks for the prince when he is not around, and protects the prince when he is around. The prince wants to protect his subordinates and friends; Xiao Jiang wants to find himself and protect his benefactor.

The picture is divided into three parts, each part has a grid, looking for and protecting yourself, shaking hands at the boundary with intersection and interaction, and then continuing to return to your own world and wandering by yourself.

There is no sense of ceremony, no conflict, no focus, too understatement, and too many feelings are diluted.

Therefore, the great protector lingered in the gate of hell several times, and the hearts of the audience did not let go. When it was his turn to play, he swaggered out again; The prince was arrested alone, and the audience was still in a hurry. The Great Protector took his time to find him, and when the prince appeared, he came out as if nothing had happened. Xiao Jiang is about to be reborn, and the audience is staring. When he went to lunch, he said he would die, so he didn't even leave a note.

They are like the kind of group performances that muddle along, playing their roles in their own squares and refusing to give alms without any superfluous expressions.

The space is too light. As soon as the water flowed, the sand disappeared and nothing settled.

This omission can also be seen as a subversion of routines, with a very distinctive style. It's just that I didn't know before that without those colorful descriptions and painstaking close-ups, if I didn't express every little turning point completely, I would eventually feel so vain that I couldn't fall to the ground.

The Great Protector explores an imaginary ultimate question: Who am I?

This topic is very good. In the end, the answer of the Great Protector is very thoughtful and scary: Although "man" is a species that can control himself more than "peanut man", who can guarantee that "man" is not the "peanut man" in the eyes of another species?

Ask a good question, the director gives his own answer, and the integrity of the film is guaranteed. It depends. It's probably a series. I will still look forward to the next one.

Although there is nothing particularly good, there is nothing wrong with it.

To sum up, I still recommend this film. The style of painting, modeling and story are fresh, and other aspects are at least on the passing line, with a slot of about 0.

For Guo Man, a production team that does animation in a down-to-earth manner, usually sells well, doesn't pretend to be forced, and doesn't lose its chain at critical moments, it is reasonable to contribute to the box office as a sign of support.

Finally, I want to ask those friends who have praised almost every movie, don't you struggle with such a question of torturing the soul-

"Is this movie really good enough to play the same star as my favorite movie?"

"Can this film really compare with the best film in film history?"

"This movie is too perfect to be approved?"

These are questions, not rhetorical questions, not questions.

20 17.7. 16