Debate: Should we give our seats to the elderly on the bus? How do we argue against the opposition? Begging for words

I saw it from other places: Wolai told you how to debate the reason why it is beneficial to open books. Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it will always be beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom.

You may want to ask, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is very simple, and the key lies in the word "total" .. This means that there will always be benefits, not only benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial rather than harmless. (Don't be entangled in this, or you will lose. The reason will be understood after reading it)

First of all, it is beneficial to good books, which is understood by everyone. So the argument is: As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is great enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards a bright road and succeed; Small enough to learn several writing methods, a few words, and even a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which can't be denied. Therefore, we can introduce several points to prove that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as they are called bad books, they will definitely affect people's character and make them go astray. But please think about it, if those bad books can't produce a certain * * sound with readers, they will make people go deep into it. If the book's structural layout, expression, conception and description, language and words are all unremarkable,

even the general "running account"-like composition is not as good as it is, then how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, you can learn at least some writing methods in the so-called bad books, and you can know a few words at worst. Can you say it is useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. That is to say, a bad book also has certain benefits.

Third, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has its two sides. Since a bad book is harmful, it must have its benefits.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book with unbearable content. Will you go to see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, even the premise of "opening the book" is gone. How can I talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a lot of examples of depravity, madness and crimes committed by reading books, what does this mean? It can only show that the reader's own mentality is not right. It belongs to the mentality problem, and can't be blamed on the book. Can someone blame the knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as reading is beneficial, no matter how big or small it is, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" must be established.

As for "opening books is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of it. If the argument is "open-book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it would be wrong to say "useless". So, on this issue, the opposing argument is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument).

Since the positive forum is certain to be established, and the opposing argument is only half right, then what is the reason for arguing? Obviously, the square is invincible!

and: the source: Song and Wang Bizhi's "A Talk on a Swallow and a Literati". Emperor Taizong read three volumes of "Yu Lan" on a daily basis, so he made up for it in his spare time. He said, "Opening books is beneficial, but I don't think it's a waste."

Interpretation: "Opening a book" means opening a book, which means reading. Metaphor is good for reading.

story: when Zhao Kuangyin, the great ancestor of Song Dynasty, established the Song Dynasty, there were still some separatist regimes in various places. The task of unifying the whole country was not completed until his younger brother Zhao Guangyi became emperor. After Zhao Guangyi acceded to the throne, he was renamed Zhao Guangling, known as Song Taizong in history. After Song Taizong unified the whole country, it was determined to carry forward the traditional culture and ordered to sort out all kinds of ancient books. At the same time, it also attaches importance to the collection of various ancient cultural materials. During the Taiping period (976-983). Ordered the compilation of three kinds of books: Tai Ping Guang Ji, Tai Ping Yu Lan and Wen Yuan Ying Hua, thus making important contributions to the preservation and development of China's cultural heritage.

Seven or eight out of ten ancient books quoted in Taiping Yu Lan are now unreadable. Therefore, it can be said that it is a collection of cultural knowledge before the Northern Song Dynasty. The original name of this book is Taiping Compilation. After the compilation, Song Dazong attached great importance to it and stipulated that he should read three volumes every day and read them all after one year. Therefore, it was renamed "Taiping Yu Lan", which means a book read by the emperor himself during the Taiping and Xingguo years.

Song Taizong's political affairs are very busy, and he often fails to read this book as planned because of other things, so he makes up reading in his spare time. The courtiers were afraid that he would read for too long, which would affect his health. Taizong said, "As long as you open the book to read, you will get benefits, so I don't feel tired."

Tanggula Mountain is endless, which is the source of blood for you and me; The fire in the dragon bone marrow shines, which is the source of wisdom for you and me; A frame of Five Thousand Years Up and Down, that is the spiritual source of you and me. Books are the crystallization of human wisdom. As the ancients said, it is beneficial to open books.

Hold a frame of books and read 5, historical events; Taste a pot of tea, and you can travel 8 times. You don't have to rush in, so you can watch Chu and Han go to war. You don't need to snow, so you can

listen to the teacher's inculcation. Many students have been studying Confucian classics hard since childhood, and they are willing to hang their heads and feel bitter, in order to enrich their knowledge system, and this is the most fundamental way to "open books." Cao Xueqin "read it for ten years and added and deleted it five times" before he became a "masterpiece of the red chamber"; Ji Xiaolan won the title of "the first gifted scholar in the world" by "reading a lot of books and wandering around the sea of books" ... They all got the greatest benefit from "opening books".

The ancients said, "Those who always open books often learn from the past". It can be seen that opening books can also make people avoid repeating the mistakes of their predecessors. Reading "Ten Thoughts on admonishing Taizong" can warn yourself that "if you think of high risks, you will be modest and rush to pasture yourself; If you are afraid of overflowing, you will think of rivers and seas. " After reading The Analects of Confucius, we know that we should "save ourselves three times and be unfaithful for others". Make friends without believing? Can't you learn it? " The ancients incorporated their own life experiences, feelings and experiences into the book, so it is beneficial to open the book.

"Open book" can cultivate self-cultivation, cultivate sentiment and improve the spiritual realm of life. Su Shi, who is heroic and sings "river of no return, the waves escape", pioneered the "bold school" and is a well-deserved "spiritual aristocrat". Li Yian, who is "thinner than a yellow flower", weaves the shyness and disappointment of the "gentle" family; "moonlight in its groves of pine, stones of crystal in its brooks". Tell Wang Wei's "Zen-like realm"; "I laughed at the sky from the horizontal knife and went to stay in the liver and gallbladder." Tan sitong sang, "It is hard for the country to live and die, so why not avoid it because of good fortune?" Singing the patriotic enthusiasm ... In the mighty long history, the ancients stirred up waves with their spirits. You just need to wander among them, and you can feel the same. It can be seen that opening books is beneficial.

Gorky said, "Books are the ladder of human progress." Open-book readers have existed since ancient times, and there are "Mr. Wuliu" who "don't ask for a solution" to read the law; There is also the reading method of "scrutinizing every word and speaking like a book" advocated by Zhu Guangqian; There are three kinds of reading realms called by Wang Guowei ... But in the end, reading books is beneficial, because reading books is not only the source of knowledge, but also a lesson for the ancients, and it is also a method of self-cultivation.

Although "opening books is beneficial" is an idiom, I think that opening books blindly may not be beneficial.

whether it is beneficial to open books mainly depends on who reads books, what books to read and age.

If a person with ulterior motives reads a book, no matter what book he reads, he always absorbs bad language and ideas. On the contrary, if a person with excellent quality reads a book, he will read selectively, but also take the rough and the fine, and absorb good sentences, paragraphs and ideas, and bad language and ideas will be rejected by him. If two people with completely different psychology both read a book about police and bandits, those with evil intentions will learn how to solve the case, while those with excellent quality will learn how to solve the case.

It's also important to read what books. If you read unhealthy books, you can't absorb them well. Just like the comic book Crayon Shinchan, I think this book is a casual reading for adults, but now all the people who read this book are children who have no ability to judge right and wrong and have learned some bad languages and habits. Therefore, I don't think it can be decided whether it is beneficial to open books.

Personally, it is very beneficial to open books!

reading is certainly beneficial, but the key lies in how you read. This is very particular.

It's also important what books you read.

It may not be necessary to say that opening books is beneficial.

It depends on what books you read and what you do with your computer.

It is certainly beneficial for you to read a good book with an open book, and it is greatly beneficial; It is certainly beneficial for you to turn on the computer to surf the Internet, collect information and write. If you read some books with bad content or play computer games, it is definitely useless. 1

Young people, you can't say that.

We should use our brains when reading, and it is right to read with a critical eye. You can't believe all the books, because there are also errors in them. It is better to believe all the books than to have no books. Most history books are correct. Books with lies exist, but not all lies. You said, "Read as few history books as possible! Because they are all lies! " There is no basis. So I don't agree with you.

agree with Mr. Shen!

I like reading history books very much.

Reading history books

can make me clear!

I also agree with Mr. Shen! !

Everything has two sides, depending on how you look at it, hehe! !

nothing is absolute in the world, but the key lies in the mind of the book opener.

Everything has two sides, and the key is under what circumstances can it be said that it is good or wrong!

if you want to say yes, that's fine, if you don't, that's fine! Anyway, people who support this view must have their own reasons!

The ancients said, "It is good to open books." Indeed, reading widely can make people have profound knowledge, be eloquent and be respected.

Du Fu, an ancient poet, famously said, "Reading is like breaking thousands of books, and writing is like writing." There is no denying this. Du Fu has read countless books. Although many books have been turned over and torn by him, the knowledge in the books has been deeply imprinted on his mind. When he wrote articles and poems, a series of good words and sentences flowed down from the pen, and one excellent poem after another was spread

through the ages. Therefore, reading more useful books can help us write good articles. Books are the nourishment of human beings and the source of human knowledge. Just as a civilized country loses its book culture, a once prosperous country will be threatened with extinction. Therefore, people can never leave books.

However, people in modern society have overturned the ancient saying that "opening books is beneficial" because they think that "opening books may not be beneficial". Of course, the statement that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will < P > affect the body and mind, which is not beneficial. When you read more unhealthy books, your poisoning will get deeper and deeper, which will lead to < P > you falling into the abyss and never having a chance to turn over. What a tragic fate! A person's future lies in the kind of books he chooses. If he chooses useful books, his future will be bright. If

he chooses those unhealthy books, his future will be dark, but if he can pull back from the brink in time and mend his ways, I believe he can have a bright future. Therefore, the statement that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial" is not entirely true.

reading more books is certainly a good thing, but you must read books that are beneficial, not books that are harmful to your physical and mental health.

Opening books is not necessarily beneficial, and sometimes (if you read bad books) it will cause damage. As the educator Xu Teli said, "It is useless to read books about your family." Most unhealthy things come from reading those bad books. The criminal facts of some teenagers in today's society are a good proof, that is, they are polluted by those bad books and periodicals, infected with bad habits, and finally embark on the road of illegal crimes.

people often say, "it is good to open books and read books." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be beneficial to open it.

Nowadays, students may all like to read novels, books and periodicals about martial arts and romance, and sometimes they forget all about eating and sleeping. Once they get lost in reading books, they will be possessed. Then, when they are preoccupied with books in class, their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go to the road of crime. Isn't this killing yourself by reading? This is only the first layer contained in "opening books is not necessarily beneficial": opening books is not necessarily beneficial. And the second floor.

secondly, we should have a choice when reading. Don't read books that are unhealthy and of little help to us. To read books, we should read some books that are beneficial to our physical and mental health and helpful to our study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading it well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading books will be beneficial to you. Therefore, my opinion is that opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life because you read a wrong book.

I don't think opening books is necessarily beneficial. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang once said in Han Dynasty: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: first, it is a good medicine, and the medicine will get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 192s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrdom because of their bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to the decline of their academic performance, and finally they make a bamboo basket and draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what volume to open first.

A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when reading, but just skim the surface and skim the water.