[Reprinted ]3. 13 See Liang Jian's communication (end) Who will be convinced of Li Yunlong's criticism?

In the first paragraph, Li Yunlong, Ding Wei and Kong Jie didn't wear new clothes as required. Captain Luo criticized three people, but they refuted them. Later, Wang Baosheng's political commissar couldn't stand it, but he also criticized the behavior of these three people. I didn't expect to be humiliated by three people because of my improper words. It can be said that this is a failed criticism. Later, captain Luo reported the situation to his superiors, and there was it.

In the second paragraph, the teacher criticized Li Yunlong, and the three of them believed it.

The criticism is wrong. If captain Luo still practices, it will be much better to talk to the three of them privately after practice, because these three people are extremely face-saving. If they lose face in public, they will naturally not admit defeat and will try their best to find something in their words. Generally speaking, the more public you praise others, the better. On the contrary, the less people know, the better. This is one of them. In addition, because Li Yunlong, Ding Wei and Kong Jie are crowded together, if they are not in an absolute position advantage, they should divide and rule. It is not impossible for Director Luo to find the three of them alone and persuade them one by one afterwards. In the video, Director Luo was of course defeated by one enemy and three.

Teachers' thinking is much more rigorous. When criticizing them, they use the following techniques:

First, affirm first, then deny. The teacher first explained that they would form a general phalanx to participate in the National Day military parade, and then commented on Li Yunlong: "I still know Comrade Li Yunlong better, and I never give in to the instructions of my superiors!" There is a psychological adaptation period for Li Yunlong to accept criticism.

Second, sincerity. He said, "I know you are all busy. . . You are all veterans of 129 division. . . "And so on, not only successfully re-established their psychological intimacy. Intimacy between people is usually proportional to the time spent on each other, but usually, it will fade with the long-term separation, just like a couple who have been separated for a long time, they also have some strangeness after meeting suddenly, which will take some time to eliminate. In addition, the teacher said, "think of those comrades who died." What title should they give? " I deeply touched their hearts and made them sincerely realize their mistakes.

In enterprises, leaders often don't remember to use this trick. For example, the boss arranged for his subordinates to write a report and send it to him before leaving work yesterday, but the subordinates did not finish the work privately. The next day, leaders usually swear, "Why didn't you finish writing the report yesterday?" In this way, the original guilty subordinates feel that they are not in debt after the boss scolded them. My usual advice to leaders is that at this time, you might as well say, "You didn't finish your report yesterday, which embarrassed me!" " At first, instead of lambasting his subordinates, let them continue to feel guilty and behave more actively in their future work to make up for their previous mistakes.

Fourth, borrow props. It is certainly not easy to convince this "iron triangle in northwestern Shanxi". In order to achieve this goal, the teacher specially wrote their graduation appraisal in advance, and then put forward their own opinions after they raised objections. Undoubtedly, "graduation appraisal" has played a good transitional role in this critical education.

In class, I often ask my supervisor, "When you criticize your subordinates, do you use one mouth, or do you use some reports or problematic products to help you speak?" The answer is self-evident. If we can use some conclusive evidence when criticizing, these "props" will make our criticism much more effective.

Fifth, let the criticized people actively express their expectations. This point was mentioned in the last article. Why criticize Li Yunlong and them this time? There are only two answers, one is to participate in the National Day military parade, and the other is to successfully complete the graduation thesis. Who put forward this? It was after the teacher gave them an appraisal for the first time, and they couldn't accept it, Li Yunlong offered it. This comment on writing completely met the teacher's expectations, so it was a success. Sixth, raise the issue to a new height. In conclusion, the teacher finally said, "Being in a high position is incompetent. In the end, it is not a person's face, but the country and the army.

What is lost is the happy life of the people! "