Comments on how to write a composition

1. How to write a composition evaluation and read an article? We often see that teachers are used to writing articles and comments, and sometimes teachers organize students to comment on their classmates' homework interactively. At this time, do you feel at a loss and don't know how to write? To this end, the teacher will guide you how to write comments on the article, hoping to help you.

When we comment on an article, we mainly look at whether the structure of the article is complete, whether the language is beautiful, whether the content is substantial, whether the imagination is rich and whether the thought is profound. We should pay attention to the following four points:

First, remember some common terms in the three main styles.

Three common styles include narrative, expository and argumentative. Narrative depends on whether the six elements of the article, such as time, place, character, cause, process and result, are clearly explained, whether the story is complete, whether there are portraits, language descriptions, action descriptions and psychological activities descriptions, and what role these descriptions play in expressing characters. Whether the connection and transition between events are natural and whether the details are appropriate. A broad narrative is also appropriate. When it comes to prose, we should think of techniques such as prose and gathering spirit, parallelism and presentation in prose, and symbol in prose. When it comes to novels, we should analyze them from characters, environment and stories. Character description (same as narrative); Environment includes both social environment and natural environment; The plot has four parts: beginning, development, * * * and ending. In short stories, we should also pay attention to the fact that the ending is often unexpected and reasonable. From the perspective of sequence arrangement, there are sequence, flashback, interpolation and narration.

Let's talk about argumentative writing. First of all, we should look at its three elements: whether the argument is clear and whether the viewpoint is correct; Whether the argument is straight to the point or in the text or at the end of the text; The theoretical argument or factual argument used in the argument depends on whether it is novel and close to the times. There are various methods of argumentation, such as argumentation, refutation, positive and negative argumentation, etc. It depends on whether the argument structure is tight and so on. In argumentative writing, we should also see whether the argument serves the argument.

Look at the Expo again. There are two types of fairs: food fairs and food fairs. The Expo aims to explain the structure and living habits of things to readers. When discussing things, we should answer what it is, why, how to develop it, etc. From the order of writing, the discussion of things is a logical order, while the discussion of things is a time, space and program order.

The above is some information about the three styles that we must know. If you want to get a good comment, you must know these basic information and remember some terms, so that you can have food in your hand and not panic.

Second, we should understand the criteria for judging the article.

The criteria of composition evaluation include basic level and development level. The basic level includes content and expression. The content includes the meaning, center, content and emotion. Expression includes style, structure, writing style and writing style; The levels of development include profundity, richness, literary talent and creativity. The grading standard of the composition is *** 12, and each article includes four grades. We must know the four levels of terms 12, because this is the basis of our comments on the composition.

Third, be sure to comment on the specific content of the article.

When commenting on an article, don't abandon the original text and preach in an empty and abstract way. Those innocuous comments are meaningless, which is the taboo of writing articles and comments. For example, in 2006, the perfect composition of Heilongjiang college entrance examination, "Tea and fast food are all suitable", if we write a comment like this: "Rhetoric, beautiful language, grand momentum and profound details are excellent works in the examination room." Therefore, we should also combine the specific content of the article to write comments. For example, comments should be written like this: "This exam composition has a good understanding of the materials given in the composition title, that is, with the development of the times, people's reading methods are also changing. The author can firmly grasp this central topic to discuss, and vividly compare' reading' to' drinking tea', which makes us seem to see: in the afternoon, a cup of green tea and a roll of yellowed ancient books. In reading, people's body and mind change unconsciously. The author calls online reading' reading the Internet', which corresponds to' reading', just right! The author compares "reading the Internet" to eating "fast food", which reminds us of McDonald's booming business. It is a paradise for young people. Yes, mostly young people. Nutritionists have repeatedly called for it to have no nutrition, but can you deny that it can't satisfy hunger? This is' reading the Internet'. What a rich imagination! It's amazing. Rhetorical methods such as parallelism and quotation are used in many places in the article. The article is magnificent and rich in connotation, which gives people a strong appeal. " In this way, comments are written according to the specific content of the article, which makes the advantages and disadvantages of the article concrete, provides specific opinions for people to learn, and makes the comments show value.

In short, we should combine the specific content of the original text to make the comments meaningful.

Fourth, comments should be focused.

When commenting on an article, you should choose the key points to comment on, and avoid grabbing at the eyebrows and beards, so as not to highlight the characteristics of the article. It is necessary to choose the most distinctive highlights of the article from the perspective of the conception, language expression or innovation of the article, so that the comments can grasp the characteristics of the article and avoid evading the importance.

To sum up, after mastering the above four points, you can write some comments on the article.

2. How to write a composition evaluation? For example, his composition has improved and his sentences have become beautiful. The content of this paper is vivid and rich, the language is novel and refreshing, and the structure is unique and reasonable.

1, the article is detailed, orderly, vivid and concrete, which is a masterpiece.

2. The close-up is unique and interesting. The full text is full of childlike innocence and interest, and it is very kind to read.

3. The article can be described in fresh and interesting language … between the lines, it is full of childlike interest in childhood, and laughter is endless, which is a masterpiece.

4. Appropriate details and the combination of reality and reality are the two major characteristics of this article, and it is also the content of this article ... richer and more vivid.

These are all ok, please adopt them if you are satisfied.

3. How to write composition comments is an important part of composition teaching, a written form of two-way communication between teachers and students, and a teacher's response to students' enthusiasm for writing. Judging from students' writing psychology, what students are most anxious to know after each writing is the teacher's evaluation of the writing situation, from which they can find their own sense of self and learning achievement. Therefore, every sentence in the teacher's comments directly affects students' writing psychology and concerns their writing interest. Writing a good composition and correcting it is an art that every Chinese teacher should master. So how to write a good composition evaluation? Personally, I think:

First, we should have an attitude of seriously appreciating and correcting.

An educator once said, "The secret of successful education lies in respecting students." In composition teaching, teachers should first treat students with an equal attitude, treat students' compositions with appreciation, and fully respect students' labor achievements.

Every time a student writes a composition, as long as it is done independently, it is really not an easy task. In their view, it was done through their own efforts. Send it to the teacher for correction, expecting the teacher's affirmation or correction, so as to gain strength and inspiration, see your achievements and progress, and improve your interest and confidence in writing. If you deny it too much, it will be counterproductive and make students misunderstand and even resent it. Even if it is a composition of poor students, as long as the teacher reads it carefully with love for them, he can find some advantages. For example, the writing style is true, it is its own language, there is no plagiarism, it is not completely written according to the teacher's model, and it is very creative; The examples given in some places are unique; Have appropriate aphorisms and famous sayings; The language is simple, the description is simple, straight to the point and so on. There are always advantages, just look for them with your heart. If you find it, give affirmation and praise in the comments and give appropriate encouragement, and students' writing motivation will definitely improve.

Second, encouraging language is often used in comment on writing.

There is a story that an old gentleman found three unusual compositions when correcting students' compositions. After the title of the first article was written, only the word "Fu" was written. His comment was: "The composition has great potential!" The second composition only has a title, but there is no word "fu". His evaluation is: "cited but not sent, wonderful!" The third composition is simply a blank sheet of paper, without even writing the title. He still gave a comment: "naive and gratifying." This is a joke, of course, with a certain irony, but after laughing, thinking about it in turn is still very enlightening to us. In other words, when writing composition evaluation, we should pay more attention to using encouraging language. In a sense, a good composition is not necessarily taught by the teacher, but it may be encouraged by the teacher. People often say that education is an art, in fact, it is an art of encouragement, especially when writing composition evaluation. A Chinese teacher should insist on encouragement, dare to encourage and be good at encouraging students' composition evaluation. Contradictions When I was in elementary school, my teacher wrote this comment at the end of his "Song Dazu's Theory of Letting Soldiers Go with a Glass of Wine": "A kid can succeed if he has good writing skills, good knowledge, eye-catching poetry reading and knowledgeable argument. He worked hard and became a great musical instrument! " At the end of the article "On Emperor Wendi of Sui Dynasty and Emperor Gaozu of Qin Shihuang", the teacher's comments are even more wonderful: "A pen full of anger is like a sword, and a thousand words are like mercury pouring down the ground, which is pervasive ..." After reading such words, we can fully imagine how deeply moved and inspired Mao Dun, a young man at that time.

4. How to write 1 in the composition comment? The article is miscellaneous but not chaotic, but it can be detailed and focused.

This article fully and appropriately exaggerates the atmosphere of … and gives a detailed and vivid description of the key points of the article.

3, ... practical, contains simple and profound philosophy, exciting and emotional to read.

This article is full of * * *, between the lines, you can feel the little author's love for …. The full text has distinct levels and fluent sentences.

5. The case narrative is vivid, concrete and interesting, which is in line with the previous metaphor. Finally, the author expressed his feelings for … in a few words, which is touching.

6. The article is well organized and forms a complete image.

7. The language of the article is fresh and lively, the description can grasp the main features of things, and the length is short and pithy, which is worth reading.

8. The content of this article is vivid and rich, the language is novel and refreshing, and the structure is unique and reasonable.

9. The article is meticulous, orderly, vivid and concrete, which is a masterpiece.

10, the close-up is unique and interesting. The full text is full of childlike innocence and interest, and it is very kind to read.

1 1. This article can be described in fresh and interesting language ... Between the lines, it is full of childlike interest and laughter, which is a masterpiece.

12, appropriate details, and the combination of reality and reality are the two major characteristics of this article ... the content is richer and more vivid.

13, the full text is fresh and elegant, kind and euphemistic, simple and unconventional, and it is worth learning.

14, the full-text language is vivid and accurate, and the plot is wonderful and tortuous, which seems to bring readers into a happy paradise and make people smile.

15, the full text is easy to understand and interesting.

16, the full text is clear, vivid and compact, and interesting.

17, pay attention to observing specific things and develop appropriate imagination, which is the success of this paper.

18, the article melts into the scenery, describes the scenery while expressing emotions, and is good at using analogy to make the article vivid and concrete.

19, the article is novel in content, reasonable in structure, fluent and coherent, and naturally accessible.

20. This article is based on real life, with appropriate materials, novel ideas, clear paragraphs, natural transition, full of interest and strong readability.

2 1, with fluent language and free and easy writing, is a relatively successful work.

22. Although the language of this article is not gorgeous, it is extremely accurate and vivid, with rich and true emotions and interesting reading.

23. The structure of the article is concise and reasonable, and the author's understanding of the original text is also very profound and thorough. The full-text language is forceful, hit the floor, exciting and exciting.

24. This composition has novel materials, wonderful ideas and lively language. There is a fresh breath of life and children's interest between the lines.

25. This article narrates the events of … in the order of events. The language is fluent, the level is clear, and it is very enjoyable from beginning to end.

26. The full text has a lively rhythm and fresh language, and it is always full of humor and fun to read.

27. The full-text narrative is concentrated, the language is concise and fluent, and the feelings are sincere and touching.

28. The tone of the whole article is relaxed and humorous, and it is interesting and fascinating to read.

29. The author is clever in conception, good at choosing points to expand, and his writing is ups and downs, which is intriguing.

There are many wonderful sentences in the full text, which add some literary interest to the article.

5. How to write the overall evaluation of composition evaluation?

1. The article is miscellaneous but not chaotic, but it can be detailed and focused.

2. Made a detailed and vivid description.

3 ... it is practical, contains simple and profound philosophy, and is exciting and moving to read.

This article is full of * * *, and the author's affection for … can be understood between the lines. The full text has distinct levels and fluent sentences.

The case narrative is vivid, concrete and interesting, which is in the same strain as the previous metaphor. Finally, the author expressed his feelings for … in a few words, which is touching.

6. The article is well organized and forms a complete image.

7. The language of the article is fresh and lively, the description can grasp the main features of things, and the length is short and pithy, which is worth reading.

8. The content of this article is vivid and rich, the language is novel and refreshing, and the structure is unique and reasonable.

9. The article is meticulous, orderly, vivid and concrete, which is a masterpiece.

10. The close-up is unique and interesting. The full text is full of childlike innocence and interest, and it is very kind to read.

1 1. The article can be described in fresh and interesting language ... Between the lines, it is full of childlike interest and laughter, which is a masterpiece.

12. Appropriate details and the combination of reality and reality are the two major characteristics of this article, which is also the content of this article ... richer and more vivid.

13. The full text is fresh and elegant, friendly and euphemistic, simple and unconventional, which is worth learning.

14. The full-text language is vivid and accurate, and the plot is wonderful and tortuous, which seems to bring readers into a happy paradise and make people smile.

15. The full text is easy to understand and interesting.

16. The full text is clear, vivid and compact, and interesting.

17. Pay attention to specific things and develop appropriate imagination, which is the success of this article.

18. The article melts into the scenery, paints the scenery lyrically, and is good at using analogy to make the article vivid and concrete.

19. The article is novel in content, reasonable in structure, fluent and coherent, and naturally accessible.

20. This article is based on real life, with appropriate materials, innovative ideas, clear paragraphs, natural transition, full of interest and strong readability.

2 1. The full-text language is fluent and the writing is free and easy, which is a relatively successful work.

Although the language of this article is not gorgeous, it is extremely accurate and vivid, full of emotion and truth, and it is very interesting to read.

23. The structure of the article is concise and reasonable, and the author's understanding of the original text is also very profound and thorough. The full-text language is forceful, hit the floor, exciting and exciting.

24. This composition has novel materials, wonderful ideas and lively language. Between the lines, there is a fresh breath of life and juvenile interest.

25. This article narrates the events of … in the order of events. The language is fluent, the level is clear, and it is very enjoyable from beginning to end.

26. The full text is lively, the language is fresh, and it is always humorous and interesting to read.

27. The full-text narrative is concentrated, the language is concise and fluent, and the feelings are sincere and touching.

28. The tone of the whole article is relaxed and humorous, full of fun, which makes people fondle it.

29. The author is clever in conception, good at choosing points to expand, and his writing is ups and downs, which is intriguing.

There are many wonderful sentences in the full text, which add some literary interest to the article.

Example of composition modification notes

6. How to write a composition evaluation This shows the importance of writing in Chinese teaching.

Composition teaching is a very important content in Chinese teaching in primary schools, but it is also a difficult point. It has become a common phenomenon that teachers are afraid of teaching and students are afraid of writing.

How to improve students' writing ability, I think our Chinese teacher can start with the evaluation and correction of composition. However, when it comes to correcting compositions, many Chinese teachers find it quite nerve-racking, especially when writing composition evaluation, we often do it hastily, in a few words, or in a cliche, empty and empty; Or use the language of evaluation and summary, which is serious and boring, making students dull to read, and it is difficult to give full play to the educational function of comments.

I feel it myself. Every time I grade a composition, I have to rack my brains to think about how to give students a proper comment, such as "the sentence is fluent and the structure is clear", "the key points are prominent and the details are appropriate" and "I can grasp the characteristics and distinctive personality of the characters" ... I think they are all perfunctory words from students. There is such a phenomenon, I wonder if our teacher has noticed it. When we send the revised exercises to the students, the first thing the students do is to open their composition books quickly, read the scores first, and then can't wait to read the comments written by the teacher.

They want to know what the teacher thinks of their compositions. Some students smiled when they saw the teacher's praise, so they told them how my composition was praised by the teacher, while some students immediately became depressed when they saw the teacher's evaluation of themselves, wishing to stay away. It's best if no one cares. No one asks, "How many points did the teacher give you for your composition and what kind of comments did you write?" This shows how much these lovely students care about the teacher's evaluation of their compositions.

Whether it is a few criticisms at the end of the article or a few general criticisms, composition evaluation is an important part of composition teaching, and commenting on students' compositions is the crowning touch in this part. Composition evaluation has both evaluation function and guidance function.

Delicate comments are of great benefit to students. It can often arouse students' interest in writing, ignite their writing enthusiasm and activate their thinking.

Proper evaluation can often broaden students' horizons, point out the maze, clarify the direction of improvement, and make composition teaching get twice the result with half the effort. So, what kind of composition evaluation is appropriate and accurate? How can composition evaluation play its guiding role most effectively? In order to stimulate students' interest in writing, teachers should abandon traditional thinking patterns, abolish old cliches and nonsense when correcting compositions, and use energetic, friendly and creative language as much as possible to arouse students' enthusiasm for writing.

First, the respect of composition evaluation I think this is the first thing for our composition evaluation. Teachers and students need to be based on equality and respect if they want to achieve spiritual convergence and emotional exchange.

The dialogue between teachers and students is an equal dialogue, which reflects the teacher's respect for students. This is also in line with the basic concept of personalized composition.

People-oriented, respecting students and personality is one of the basic theoretical contents put forward by the project concept. In traditional teaching, composition evaluation is often blunt, rigid, cold, or empty and vague comments, which makes students feel that composition is abstract.

After the composition is sent down, you either have a look or don't even look at it, which makes the comments useless. In fact, primary school students' composition is not only the embodiment of their writing ability, but also their personal experience in life practice.

Therefore, teachers should stand in the perspective of understanding and respecting students, change the teacher's preaching behavior in previous comments, and have an equal dialogue and patient spiritual exchange with students in a friendly tone, thus stimulating students' writing enthusiasm. Second, the accuracy of composition evaluation. As a teacher, we should give students a clear definition and point out the crux of students' composition.

"Writing teaching should be close to students' reality, make students easy to write and be willing to express, guide students to pay attention to reality, love life and express their true feelings." (Chinese Curriculum Standards).

Teachers should be good at grasping the characteristics of primary school students' understanding of things, be correct and objective, don't overestimate students' requirements, and don't make reproachful comments. When writing, try to be detailed, specific and clear, and don't generalize, especially some nonsense and cliches, such as highlighting what is reasonable in structure; What words are accurate and sentences are fluent; What is the reasonable plot arrangement of the article ... such comments are empty and boring, and can't arouse students' interest in writing at all.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the article? A simple "fluent sentence" or "impassable sentence" can't solve the fundamental problem. After students get their own composition, they still don't know how to write further.

As a critic, teachers should point out the source of students' writing and how to improve it. For example, it is pointed out that the article does not write true feelings, which directions need careful observation and in-depth experience, which materials are interesting and meaningful, and which parts are open-minded and imaginative, thus guiding students to know which ones are worth writing and which ones are not.

Third, the inspiration of composition evaluation, composition evaluation accepts students. Whether students are willing to accept and be inspired is the measure to test whether the teacher's comments are qualified. Students' age, psychology, gender and experience are different, and the articles written will have different styles. This requires teachers to change their tone, choose a novel angle for students' nonstandard language or exercises that don't meet the writing requirements, use their brains skillfully, design them carefully, turn the abstract into simple and vivid, write them out to make students read fresh and inspiring, guide students to think independently and explore actively, so as to find problems in their own compositions and improve their analytical ability.

Write comments that convince students and give full play to the guiding role of composition evaluation. Good composition evaluation should also be short and pithy words, so that students can gain something, communicate with students and understand each other, and at the same time be pleasing to the eye.

Make students think about their own exercises, understand the shortcomings, stimulate their own needs and desires for correction, and thus enhance their initiative in self-correction.