When will China’s Insurance Breach of Contract Compensation Law be promulgated?

In the case of state compensation application, the judge said: "The "State Compensation Law of the People's Republic of China" promulgated in 1995 stipulates that the statute of limitations for applying for compensation is 2 years. If the statute of limitations (expiration) has expired, the statute of limitations will not apply. "Pre-compensation". The question is: Where does the so-called statute of limitations of 2 years come from? !

An unjust case refers to a serious infringement of a citizen’s personal rights and legal property by an agency of the national government, including the police, courts, etc., that is, depriving or infringing upon the legal rights granted to citizens by the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China. Including their legal property and all legal rights to participate in fair social competition, personal economic development, life, and study.

The "State Compensation Law" promulgated in 1995 does stipulate that the statute of limitations for applying for compensation is 2 years, but the problem is: 1. Many unjust cases occurred under the "State Compensation Law" promulgated in 1995 2 , 3 years ago, according to this logic, wouldn’t the claims for these unjust cases have expired? ! 2. There was no such national compensation law before 1995. The fact is that there is no mention of the word "expiration" stipulated in the national compensation law promulgated in 1995. Since there is no issue of "expiration" in fact, it must Compensate according to law! 3. Taking a step back, even if it complies with the "expired" provision of no compensation in the National Compensation Law promulgated in 1995, then I would like to ask: why is the decision not to compensate implemented in accordance with the National Compensation Law promulgated in 1995, and the victim should get Why is the compensation not implemented in accordance with the National Compensation Law promulgated in 1995? ! The logic is confusing and does not make sense at all, and it is a serious contradiction! !

The "Constitution" is the national law. When all laws conflict with it, the "Constitution" should be obeyed. However, when citizens’ personal rights, legal property rights, and citizens’ rights to participate in fair competition in society, personal economic development, study, and life granted by the Constitution are violated, the National Compensation Law stipulates that no compensation will be awarded before the infringement case is promulgated. This would completely conflict with the "Constitution of the People's Republic of China"! The "State Compensation Law" is a legal fig leaf, which is equivalent to covering the infringement behavior before 1995 with a legal cloak! Article 5 of the "Constitution" stipulates: "All laws, administrative regulations and local regulations must not conflict with the Constitution." The provision in the "State Compensation Law" that "compensation laws are not retroactive" not only tarnishes and negates the "China The principle of all legal rights granted to citizens by the Constitution of the People's Republic of China has trampled on the equal civil rights of everyone before the law!

The logic of this law is confusing, unbalanced, and self-contradictory, making it look like a huge international joke. The scary thing is: What will happen if the smart little Japan learns it? A film will soon be released to solve all the comfort women issues!

Extended reading: How to buy insurance, which one is better, and step-by-step instructions to avoid these "pitfalls" of insurance