I feel about 450 words after reading the stern month.

1: The living computer Mike, it can be a man or a woman, but it is still a man on the whole, because the author communicates with the host from a male perspective, and there is no room and interest to play more on the female side of the computer. This is a gimmick, not a theme, just like the plot in which computers are interested in jokes. A living computer is too powerful and dangerous. Fortunately, positive people have mastered it, otherwise ... I think the revolution will accomplish nothing without this living computer ... just like now, if I don't have a hard notebook, I can't irrigate online.

2. Manny's multifunctional hands are great. I want one too. I am a chef when cooking, a programmer when writing code (built-in n mature routines), a perspective when touching lottery tickets, and I can serenade some romantic songs when falling in love ... but if I have to change it with one hand, I decide to keep my present one, except.

Revolution, if it doesn't break out in silence, will perish in silence. In fact, the protagonist and his core members of revolutionary leadership are not dealing with the lunar government, including the lunar control forces on the earth-it is unimaginable that the regime on the moon has only two-digit guards and heavy cavalry, and the spacecraft on the earth that crusades against the moon seems to bring only enough power to direct traffic-in this case, confronting the direct enemy is as easy as telling jokes. What is difficult is how to motivate the people on the moon to meet the change wholeheartedly and inspire their fighting spirit. He pays more attention to politics and his own destiny, so the author often writes that the moon puppet government needs to do more stupid things to anger the public, so he doesn't wipe the government people off the planet through Mike like ants. In fact, the success of the revolution is easier than imagined, with less sacrifice and uncomplicated regime alternation. As the author said, "When preparing for the revolution, it is quite solid, and when it is really done, it is too fast, like a gust of wind" ... In a simple environment, or in any environment, the biggest enemy may be yourself-just overcome your fears, delays, hesitations and inner disputes and do what you should do.

4. Woman, the moon is a strict woman. On this planet, in this society, there is no law, only self-discipline. Strict and ruthless execution is the foundation of self-discipline. Don't be annoying, don't do annoying things, otherwise the natural Darwinian law on the moon will only give you zero pressure space-and it is often "casual", and you will get there without any protection, perhaps just because you touched another woman's hand without permission, or did something with ulterior motives-but there are no small things here, only strict choices-death or survival.

This reminds me of a short story about Utopia in Robert Scheck's Romantic Service Company, where legal robbery, open and free shooting and voting to kill people (mainly civil servants) are used to maintain social order. This is very different and effective, and evolution is going on at a high speed in this society-because only those who survive are suitable to survive there. This kind of society is a paradise for rational anarchists. But not everyone's paradise.

5: Women, there are strict women on the moon. Women rule the family on the moon, affecting life and death. As long as there are women who hate you, you are waiting to enjoy the zero-pressure space. The reason is simple: there are too few women on the moon, much less than men. Plunder can't solve the problem of distributing and possessing women (men who are stronger and more cruel than you are always guilty), unless they share, * * can maintain stability-so the moon is polygamous, they love each other and respect each other, and they live together in a big family, have children and raise offspring-but I don't think this means that women must live on the moon. Reusable resources are protected by totems, and men share resources on this basis to meet everyone's basic needs and the development of the whole society ... As long as the ratio of men to women changes, men who master material, weapons and political power will definitely break the shackles of matriarchal clans and do whatever they want ... Women are like air and water, which are cherished on the moon because of less and ignored on the earth because of more. ...

A social model, including marriage model, has no moral factors. This in-depth discussion can start with the seven needs of human beings, but in short, when facing the pressure of reproduction as a race, morality is powerless. Morality is what most people struggle to protect the group from continuing to eat. At present, there is no need to argue about all kinds of "morality", just as the protagonist explained the truth of polygamy to the earth people, and the earth people arrested the protagonist for "bigamy" (and a little political factor). People with different positions and different environments have different morality-as long as my morality does not harm your interests, what do you care?

6: How many years can the moon be mined? 1000? 100 year? Only seven years? Yes, in just seven years, the earth people have been mining the moon, and they have adopted a mining strategy of asking for nothing from the moon, just like what we are doing to the earth at present. In the novel, the earth with a population of 1, 654,380 billion is overwhelmed, and people can only sleep on the streets. Famine hangs high in the direction of the moon like the sword of Damocles. The moon is the last straw, but it will be hollowed out for lighting one day ... just like the oil of the earth, it is said that it can only be mined for 50 years.

7. Politics, organization, society and revolution are heinlein's favorites. He pinned his dreams and hopes for a new society on this book. In his works, the elites carefully designed revolutionary organizations-much like pyramid selling mouse clubs, but they pyramid selling revolutionary kindling. Fools and selfish people argue in a rigged parliament. More ironically, the most hysterical proposal was given by an equally hysterical woman-perhaps the author thinks that it is really irrational for a woman to be crazy. Through Professor Delapa Zha, the author advocates that the government should not collect taxes, but continue to streamline. He believes that the government only needs to tell others what the government will not do, not what the government has the right to do, so that the government can achieve real democracy and will not infringe on everyone's freedom ... It is ideal, really, if the whole world teaches people who are good at self-discipline, high morality, independence and perfection, his dream society will look quite perfect, but the reality is not. Selfishness, greed, self-righteousness, irritability, narrow-mindedness, short-sightedness and abuse of freedom abound. A rational anarchist is destined to keep looking for his paradise in science fiction and dreams. ...

So the professor completed his mission, got rid of the passionate revolution and went to his paradise. He was released. .....

8. Mike is also relieved. Mike is too strong and energetic to control. In the period when revolution is not needed, there is no visible enemy to consume his overactive cpu ... I can't imagine what a computer that yearns for humanity but doesn't understand humanity can do. Human nature is complex, and darkness is also an important aspect of human nature. Mike can't live to master and manipulate the darkness. The author doesn't want this. He can't understand this.

A kind of helplessness, I can almost hear the author's sigh: "Too many changes ..." Perhaps at this time, it will make people feel better to keep a little nostalgia for the beautiful years, brilliant dreams and graceful expectations.

9. China, the author pays a faint tribute to China. In his works, China people and China people are tolerant, cautious and smart, and only do effective and practical things. At the same time, he mercilessly threw the "stone" on the land of the United States, let those idle fools die in the bombing of the moon, and poured his anger on the so-called moon government, the paper tiger United Nations and the North American powers. I don't know if it can be understood as an anger that hates iron and does not produce. Perhaps it is this anger that makes the author pin his hopes on China, an ideological opponent.

In addition, let's talk about one more detail. Dr. zhang, the representative of China to the United Nations, invited the protagonist to discuss the transportation between the earth and the moon, and described the technical details of the "catapult". I think this description is technically necessary, but it puts people and occasions in the wrong place. Logically speaking, since the catapult on the moon was previously developed by the puppet "lunar government", there is no reason why people on earth are not clear about this technology, and there is no need to discuss it with the lunar people at all. In the negotiations between the earth and the moon, whether the earth can build a low-cost transportation channel to the moon is actually a political issue, not a technical issue, and should not be discussed by the representative of the United Nations, regardless of his position and professional background.

10. The earth's acceptance of the independence of the moon does not mean that it has given up the moon or admitted its freedom. In the face of politics, interests and war, there is no morality and belief, only the comparison of interests and investment, just like the concept mentioned in cryptography that "the cost of cracking a secure password is greater than the cost of what it protects", the firm counterattack of the moon against the earth, and the inability of the earth to fight against the moon. Let the earth people think that attacking the moon is not worth the loss, so it is better to stop fighting (just like the moon's attitude towards the number of women). This is the rule of the game: there is no free lunch and no inedible lunch. Everything depends on your efforts and pursuits, and there is a little compromise between the two sides. This truth is really everywhere.