Impromptu comments on the box office popularity of the movie See you later.

Let's start with the conclusion. I, just me, feel terrible.

I'm not a spoiler, but my film reviews, maybe you won't like them, even myself, I don't like them very much. I didn't want to post it at first.

Three young people, starting from the easternmost tip of the mainland and heading west, met all kinds of people and saw the world.

The world sometimes needs some black humor and self-mockery, some resistance to the secular, and at the same time succumb to the secular. People with ideals sometimes have to give up their ideals. Those beautiful feelings we expect cannot be treated with disappointed or even hypocritical faces.

We may not know anything when we walk on the road, but we can all reach our destination in the end.

This is a long way for our generation of young people to go. Once we thought that the heart was higher than the sky, but in the end we found that the sky was always higher than the heart. At one time, we thought everything would be fine, but we obviously experienced many unfortunate endings.

We used to hammer the wall of reality hard, but in the end, some of us will crawl under the wall.

So sometimes, we need to say something, do something, and let us make some noises.

This is the impression that Han Han has always given. He is like us holding a sword, so many young people like Han Han because Han Han is trying to help us find the answer between ideal and secular.

This time, Han Han also tried to embody this feeling in the film. Most people who watch this movie may not like Tiny Times. Some people say that a movie is needed to tell the world that young people still need voices. Glass houses and French simple meals are not the stories of ordinary people. We need three down-and-out young people to take us on the road together.

Then all these feelings, I believe that Han Han's original intention is to use a movie to perfectly interpret.

In these clear, exquisite and beautiful aerial shots, distant views and overhead shots.

But these, what I said above, are all words.

This is not a movie.

Movies, not essays.

If it is a narrative poem or prose, it may be a masterpiece, but as a film, it is very, very unqualified.

Disappointed, terrible, boring, preaching.

I'm writing this just to say that I understand Han Han's thoughts, and his feelings are fine. It can be implemented in movies and film performances, full of preaching flavor and dull narrative rhythm, so it failed.

I don't deny that I also like Han Han. I even have a book signed by him in those days, which was written for Zhu Xuan. Most of my friends and I have placed our hopes on this film. We have been waiting for the premiere for a long time, but I have to say with disappointment that this film is not good-looking, no, it is terrible, and as a fan of Han Han, I will try my best to analyze this bad place.

I don't think that liking Han Han should mean liking all his works.

I don't think Han Han appreciates this kind of behavior.

1, here comes the sentence

In this movie, time seems to be infinite. No violent conflict, no strong motivation. He is just a group of people, driving and talking on the road.

They met some people and talked to them.

But this conversation is by no means Woody Allen's. It has no confrontation and no opinion. It just keeps drawing conclusions. It tells you that you haven't seen it and have no worldview. It tells you that children are right or wrong, and adults only look at pros and cons. It is also said that like is presumptuous, and love is restraint.

These words are good sentences in themselves, but in movies, you can't just let the people in the play read them as if they were teaching.

These themes will not be reflected through an event, or even discussed. It's just that the people in the play are sitting in the car and standing in the street. They suddenly popped up these sentences directly. It's like you bought a famous saying from the Three Kingdoms. There was no fighting or shooting halberds, only what they said was life imprisonment. Chapter one, Liu Bei: Don't do it for the sake of goodness and smallness.

This kind of preaching is not suitable for an already discerning audience like us.

In the process of watching movies, we even have the idea of waiting for sentences. Many beautiful sentences implanted in pre-marketing are read like this. Jia and talk, Wang and talk. No pushing or props. They just stood face to face, sentence by sentence to each other.

Here's the sentence, I heard it, and I thought so when I watched the movie.

2. Dull narrative skills

The biggest difference between literature and screenwriter lies in the story itself, not the charm of language.

When William Feng meets Yolanda, maybe in the book, we will write (I will avoid spoilers), where William Feng went, what kind of light he saw Yolanda, what happened at that moment, what happened to Yolanda later, what happened to William Feng when they came to the pool table, and then Yolanda said.

But in the focal plane, this is very simple. William Feng walked in. The two men simply interacted and came to the pool table. Yolanda began to say, really speaking, there are no other impurities. While playing billiards, he explained William Feng's life story. His love was in Yolanda's mourning, and his hopes were dashed. This period is the best time to pull William Feng back from his brave and vast brother to ordinary youth.

But only Yolanda's confession.

This kind of chanting is like someone opening a book and telling us what happened, and then what happened.

Among them, surging emotions, disillusionment of love and heroic dreams are not reflected in the picture.

Movies are things that can't let you directly express the inner feelings of the characters. It requires action and conflict.

Although I understand William Feng's thoughts, I know that it is not enough to understand movies. If I want to understand this truth and understand this matter, I should just read a book.

I watch movies in the hope of seeing the pictures inside.

The same thing happened in Wallace Chung's story. In this way, Wallace Chung put his helmet on the car and told the story of himself and his wife. And then it was over. In this way, the director didn't even bother to use the flash to perform.

The essence of this film is not a group of people telling stories, but a group of people telling stories.

3. Role setting

Chen Bailin's role as a river is so boring. This is an almost sleepy character. In fact, the role of silence is not without, but the rivers in Chen Bailin have not really played a role. He lacks the aura and childishness of the Blue Gate era, leaving only clumsiness.

I know that He Jiang is a shy and gentle person, but most of the time in the movie is just expressed by his silence, and his facial expression has hardly changed. When the director asked for this shot, it didn't seem that the requirements for the actors were very high.

He is like a friend you can't talk to, and you have to embark on a long journey with him.

You are embarrassed and don't know what to say, but the movie goes on.

I think Kong Lianshun's whole article is quite interesting. He is just a walk-on and the only mute in this movie.

4, sloppy

There are four stories in the movie, namely, Wang, Yolanda and. They are actors, liars (or prostitutes), billiard room owners (pen pals for many years) and enthusiastic friends.

In the early days, Chen Qiaoen may want to reflect the helplessness of the little people in the struggle. Her misplaced design also clearly explains the director's thinking, but the whole story, a dialogue from one end of the set to the other, is too quiet to handle, and even some thoughtful people can't save the whole story.

Wang is the only interactive story. There is interaction with Wang in the room. This interaction is also the whole movie. It is the only place that makes us feel that it is still beautiful. William Feng's legs were numb, and he chased the gas station. At least this story can be seen.

Yolanda is a conversation in the billiard room, tasteless.

Wallace Chung leads to the satellite. His dream is a satellite. It was supposed to be a passionate speech. Even though his Cantonese pronunciation is particularly tasteful, it is still unsatisfactory, but the final story is worth remembering at least.

I believe none of the four actors can act, but the story itself is like this.

This should be the director's problem.

Not to mention, Hu Sheng in the early stage finally lost in this way, which is simply a heinous embarrassment.

After Wang's story ended, for a long time, there was no excitement, ups and downs, ups and downs. We followed the director's camera, as if we were always on a straight road, with no sharp turns and no jams.

What is sloppy?

One day, we went to Tibet and saw the vast sky and the endless sea. It's really beautiful.

But if we watch it for a whole month, we will feel pain.

Because that's all it is.

Step 5 laugh

Many people say it's funny, so this is an interesting and wonderful comedy.

I don't think Han Gonggong wants to make a comedy. As I said at the beginning, he must have his feelings. He wants to show these feelings. This is his skeleton. This joke is just a little embellishment. This should never be a comedy.

It's easy to understand, just like some of Han Han's novels, between those sentences, we always remember the fun of this word with a smile.

But as we all know, we are not watching The Clown King or comedy stories.

Some people say it's a ridiculous road movie?

Absurdity is not a joke.

These jokes, such as vigil is to keep the sun, I don't know if life is hard or not, but the penis is definitely hard. First of all, I don't want to say whether these jokes are clever or not, but I understand that these jokes were originally intended to serve the theme of the story.

Now it's the theme.

I saw a digital joke in Weibo, saying it was a good film.

If Han Han's movies are like this, I will be speechless. I think people who used to read his novels under desks didn't just laugh.

6. Exquisite highlights

The exquisite part of Han Han, if we don't consider the broken bones, some details are very irritating, and we will like it very much.

I think the song "Girl Country" is perfect.

In Chen Qiaoen's early stories, the sound of gunfire and the female students in the execution ground are meaningful, which is of great significance.

Even Wang's ringtone, when translated, echoes with the characters, poetic and romantic. I don't mind seeing the lame things in the eyes of these professionals in the movie, because I really like them, but these things can't control the whole movie, and spirituality is subdivided and destroyed in an instant.

It's not good to cook frogs in warm water. This level is too simple, too straightforward and not smart enough.

That's probably all I remember.

7. Finally, speak your mind.

Before the film was released, everyone was applauding and saying that they didn't respect it. I believe many people really like it. They combed Han Han's mental journey, even Pu Shu. I love Pu Shu too. To be honest, I have high expectations. I really hope this movie can beat Xiao Dai, because I like his idea, but I will feel embarrassed when something like this comes out.

I may be sad that Han Han's film is not well made, but I had hoped it would be a wonderful work.

Many people look for various highlights in this movie just because they like Han Han. The jokes are funny, the shots are good and the stars are beautiful, so the movie is good.

I don't deny that some people really think so.