What baggage in cross talk can be called high-level baggage?

Wang Meng once said: Any conclusion summed up in one sentence will most likely be wrong.

This saying can also be used in the cross talk world, such as "Guo Degang is the three vulgar people", "Shit and piss are equal to low-level baggage", etc.

Pure excrement and peeing can make some people feel physically uncomfortable, while singing praises can also make some people nauseated. From the perspective of equal audience experience, pure peeing and praising virtues are actually the same thing. All very low-level.

I agree with something Guo Degang said: Even if someone never mentions shit, he can smell the smell of scum when he opens his mouth.

But I don’t agree with another sentence of Guo Degang: Shitting and peeing is a physiological phenomenon that you can’t avoid. There is no need to deliberately avoid it. People who don’t poop are Pixiu.

This is actually sophistry. Shiting and peeing are physiological phenomena, which does not mean that they can be said casually in any place without processing. Peeing and peeing does not mean that it is vulgar, but most of Guo Degang's peeing and peeing jokes are just vulgar and vulgar. Let me give you an example:

One of Guo Degang’s favorite jokes is that Gao Feng and Yu Qian went out to eat shit. I believe most people remember it. But the prototype of this joke is a very advanced satirical joke. It was very popular in major forums and connotation jokes.

This is actually an economics joke. The first half of the original version is the same as Guo Degang’s joke. Two economists went for a walk and saw a pile of dog shit. Then economist A asked economist B to Eat it and bet 100 million yuan. Then Economist B ate it without hesitation, and Economist A said he owed you 100 million yuan. Then he saw a pile of dog shit. Economist B did the same thing and let economist A eat the dog shit, and the two did not owe each other.

Guo Degang’s joke ends abruptly here, but in the original joke, the loudest baggage is at the end. After eating a lot of shit, the two economists said very excitedly: Look, we have created a GDP of 200 million for the country by offsetting debts one after another. We are amazing!

This joke has two levels of connotation: first, economists love to eat shit; second, economists eating shit can increase GDP.

This is actually a satire on those incompetent public figures who engage in formalism, use some data to make tables, and boast that our country is already well-off per capita and that national income is constantly rising. Although it is a very vulgar curse, it is very high-level and relieves anger.

But Guo Degang arranged Gao Yuqian's jokes and stopped the joke on eating shit. He directly described in detail how to eat shit and various physiological experiences, removing the originally satirical parts, and the whole thing was just It falls short of the cliche, and although the performance is wonderful, it is really low-level.

Another example is the Zen Master series that was particularly popular before. Zhang Helun talked about one, and the content is actually quite good. This joke is quite consistent with the rules of cross talk. There are two characters in it, the Zen master and the helper (the object of ridicule). The principle of this joke is that the Zen master who was supposed to speak profound truths finally said a big saying.

For example, the version told by Zhang Helun: Guo Degang went to the Zen Master for help. He was very sad because he was too dark. The Zen Master asked him to open the window and let the sun shine into the room. Guo Degang suddenly had an epiphany: Please tell me to keep my heart bright and not to worry about the criticism from the outside world. The Zen master said: No, I want to see where you are, you look too damn dark.

The plot twist here is also very good, and the baggage is also loud, but Zhang Helun’s sentence: It’s too dark. It seems meaningless. This modal particle is purely for the purpose of swearing and has no place in the story. This can involve another point that Deyun Society is often criticized for, and that is dirty mouth.

In fact, foul language does not mean that it is vulgar. The appropriate and reasonable foul language can actually improve the plot. Many classics are full of foul language, but it has a very positive effect on character creation. But if you do it for the sake of being rude, or just to create atmosphere, then it’s not high-class.

I saw the same Zen Master series of jokes that satirized Kobe on Hupu. It is said that Kobe went to a Zen master for help because the outside world criticized him for his random shooting and his inability to score. The Zen master asked him to lead a one-legged chicken out and make the chicken walk. Kobe held the one-legged chicken and fell down eight times in a row without even walking a few steps. Then Kobe had an epiphany: Master Zen, do you want me not to be afraid of failure, to get up no matter how many times I fall and keep shooting until I make the shot? The Zen master shook his head and said, "I'm going to make you lose your temper."

There is also a swear word here, but it is within a reasonable plot, that is, this sentence has foreshadowing and landing point. Compared to Zhang Helun, who is too damn dark, he is obviously more advanced.

Of course, I don’t mean that high-end jokes are equal to education or satire, but that any baggage, including the baggage of the lower three routes, can be made more advanced without being so straightforward and with appropriate literary processing. a lot of. For example, Emperor Ming of the Tang Dynasty secretly watched Concubine Yang take a bath and praised her beautiful breasts. He could write a seven-character quatrain. This was high-level teasing, much more advanced than Lao Guo's "There are people who are great".