The media's thinking conspiracy theory

many times, scientific and technological media reports emphasize timeliness. However, due to too much news, or other reasons that we can guess and can't guess, we sometimes miss relevant reports.

But now there is a new mode, "post-reporting". That is, a few days after it happened, it was not completely dissipated. Then, with the help of the core content and keywords of the matter, make a sticky report, but this is not a simple post-report at all, otherwise it will be meaningless, because you are late, and it will have no effect at all.

and since you have chosen this way, you must have his tricks. What magic tricks are there? In fact, it is quite simple, "flaunt yourself and then spit on your peers". Well, it's as simple as that. It may have unexpected effects. But this is not a good trick, so don't try it.

strangers always need to introduce themselves, and having good self-presentation ability can really make them gain more benefits and stand out more easily in the crowd, but flaunting themselves is different from self-introduction. It's boring to flaunt yourself, because it's not for you to say. What you say is not only weak, but also reduces the score for most people who can think independently, and may even have no image at all.

inexplicably flaunt yourself and clarify why. No one said you, and there was no lawsuit. Is it completely impossible just because I lead an honest and clean life? At least I think so. Sometimes it's like a drunk saying I'm not drunk. It's not that you're not drunk at all, but that you're too drunk.

There's no such thing as pure inexplicably, but it's all meaningful, but the simple masses are easily influenced by it. Actually, I always think that the masses are simple, but not stupid, believing that they are really just themselves. Sometimes it's funny to lie to themselves, but what they lie to themselves is that they can't forgive themselves. Of course, there are also some people who follow the blind booing, which will make them more lost. Please let it go, it's still bad. That's what you want to see. Interesting.

besides, spitting on peers is what the media often do, because the media is a mouth, so spitting is what the mouth does. Like some very powerful commercial companies, they will support their peers in order to have strong opponents, so that they can make themselves stronger. The media is different, and the media peers are the same as their counterparts in Degang Guo.

If you don't spit on your peers, you can't show your height. Isn't there a well-known saying, it's better to be surprised than not to know? I won't know until I compare it. Yes, many comparisons are selective and exaggerated, otherwise, how can people take the initiative to compare them? Many times, the people who are compared always tell us that they are right and always think that they have won, because they took the initiative and took the initiative, but at this time the masses found out that it was a sneak attack, in the name of justice. Finally, I got to know him more clearly in the hearts of the masses.

Someone will always be deceived and taken away, and the media can't shoulder the responsibility of the readers' trust as claimed by peers, but it will always help you clear up some fog. Only in this way can we be worthy of the reader's most precious resources-time and attention.

what the online media wants is traffic. No matter how the traffic arrives, it is not illegal and will not close the station. This has achieved the goal, even if it is very short-term, the post-reporting will also bring traffic. If you are chaste enough, then you should investigate, and news will no longer exist in your place, because enough investigation will have no timeliness, and it will not be news without timeliness. Seeing that they are doing post-news now, maybe they really want to do it, which is admirable. An organization like the CIA on the Internet is the way you should go, which is in line with your advertised values. Don't let the masses see jokes. What if it comes true?

Many times, the media say that they don't report because they have an illusion, which is purely for the sake of eye-catching, so we don't report. Then you can report it, too, and there will be one story, if you are not intrigued, if you are pure enough. If you have a high level, you can set things right, or you can report it, which also reflects your value. If the real state is high, you completely ignore it. If you want traffic, don't talk about the realm.

someone said, yes, they are starting to set things right now. It is, but they said at the beginning that we would not report for duty in order not to attract their attention. But you finally said it, and you reported it. Anyway, it caught your eye. Or in the way of spurning peers and flaunting yourself.

Is common sense useful? Yes, it is. But the media said that common sense is very deceptive. Common sense is the daily use of the masses. Common sense is too one-sided to play any role at all. This is a basic thing and you don't need to mention it. You have to say something or be deep enough. It's really unkind to get common sense to flaunt yourself if you can't get up or down. No one knows everything, and your common sense will eventually be insufficient. What to do after that is not in line with your advertised values.

I want to explain a problem with a single detail, which has the effect of killing with one blow. However, this is not a contest, let alone a sentencing court. Even if he is really wrong, your one-sidedness is likely to lead the mistake to you. This is true love. Proving a problem with a detail is one-sided in most cases.

finally, I used you to attract people's attention, but that's not all.