Dragon and west dragon are not the same thing. Why do you use the same word in translation?

The two cultures have developed different products, there is no distinction between high and low, and there is no distinction between good and evil. Only some people simply use the same name when looking at some morphological similarities.

In fact, it is almost impossible to classify the two into one category, let alone make some horizontal comparisons and insist on raising or belittling anyone.

There are three reasons,

First, because both of them are fictional products, at least they can't be proved to exist or exist objectively at present (there shouldn't be a fool telling me the joke of "confirming that dragons don't exist"), that is to say, people A or A, people B or B each imagined something, and then a group of people A and B argued over the boring question of whether something A was better or something B was better, such as Thanos in Marvel comics or the Monkey King in Journey to the West.

Second, the sources of the maximum probability of the two are not the same, that is to say, even if the existence of dragons can be confirmed one day, the maximum probability of the two is not something that came out of the same evolutionary route, that is to say, the species relationship of the two should be far from each other in cladocera.

Third, the most important and direct condition for judging whether it belongs to the same species is to breed fertile offspring. Because no living body has been found at present, it cannot be confirmed as the same species, as well as horses, donkeys and mules.