What are the advantages and disadvantages of China's democratic election system compared with the United States?

The electoral system in the United States is electoral votes. The larger the population, the more electoral votes each state has.

For example, New York State has 29 electoral votes.

Democrats and Republicans got 565,438+0% and 49% of the votes respectively.

According to the percentage, the Democratic Party should get 15 and the Republican Party should get 14.

But the rule of electoral votes is that the winner takes all the electoral votes. The Democratic Party won the election in new york and got all 29 electoral votes.

The advantage of this system lies in whether the government's administration can be recognized by the region.

The disadvantage is that public opinion is easily distorted. This set of rules has many shortcomings and is not used by many countries.

In democratic countries, the stability and development of cabinet system has always surpassed that of presidential system.

Although the American political system has its greatness in the past 300 years, frankly speaking, it is not so easy to copy it.

As for China's political system, frankly speaking, democracy does not exist at all.

China people's freedom and human rights have been guaranteed to a certain extent, but after all, it is not as good as a real democracy.

The government's administration has no public opinion base.

Taiwan Province Province has experienced two political party rotations, which is finally a milestone of real democracy.

Don't worry about the ugly behavior of one party turning its back on the other after losing the election. The democratic chaos in Taiwan Province Province is what China will learn in the future.

But it's no use learning.

The chaos of democracy in Taiwan Province Province is also happening constantly in Europe and America, where people have been elected for a hundred years, because democracy has its shortcomings.

As for the point that money equals votes, bribery and other processes will occur in the process of democracy, which is inevitable pain.

For example, buying tickets in rural areas of Taiwan Province Province is still very useful, but the effect of fast-growing cities is very poor

When democracy is mature, buying tickets will not be a problem.

What really makes the law of "money = votes" come true is that political parties embrace consortia. On the contrary, there is this trend all over the world.

When democracy develops to a certain stage, voters will begin to form.

For example, Tainan County in Taiwan Province Province is the greenest and most supportive of Democratic Progressive Party.

Who would have thought that a long time ago, the Kuomintang defeated Chen Shui-bian in the Tainan county magistrate election.

But now the Kuomintang can't win the election in Tainan at all, because the voter structure has been finalized.

In the United States, children from democratic families will also vote for the Democratic Party.

In Taiwan Province Province, Democratic Progressive Party's children's families will also vote for Democratic Progressive Party.

This probability is very very high.

To win the presidential election, two conditions must be absolutely met.

One is to urge supporters of their own party to vote, such as conservative issues shouted in Republican elections.

The second is to win the votes of the middle voters.

Usually, the problem of fewer supporters' votes will be washed out as long as the advertising tickets are smashed.

So why do political parties embrace the consortium because it needs election funds?

It is difficult to please the middle voters. These people become middle voters because their knowledge and wisdom do have their own standards.

Only by serving beef that is beneficial to the country in policy can we win the votes of this group of people.