Is there anyone who likes "Psycho" as much as I do?

Frankly speaking, the logic of this film is still a bit confusing, and many plots are not very reasonable. Imagine that a person who can meet the future changes his or other people's corresponding behavior, then what will happen in the end It means corresponding changes, just like what is expressed in "The Butterfly Effect", a slight error can lead to a thousand miles. However, in several scenes in the film, the two psychics seem to have seen the consequences of a certain behavior. For example, in the scene when the two met for the first time in the bar, what would happen if they yelled? This is just an assumption, not a real one. What happened, what really happened was that the murderer was beaten, yes, but he didn't see it. I think the big problem with movies and novels that foresee the future is logic. Of course, this may be limited due to practical reasons. ?But one question raised by the film is worth considering, that is, whether others with terminal illnesses have the right to end their lives. In the old man's memories at the end of the film, we can see that his daughter's beautiful smile in his memories was just his choice to ignore her pain. The old man actually saw his daughter's pain, and finally sent her away with his own hands. Maybe this was why he couldn't He untied the knot in his heart and separated from his wife. In the end, he pinned his feelings for his daughter on the policewoman. After saving her, he also completed a redemption of his own soul. Finally, he could face the past honestly, and Get your wife back. But, is euthanasia possible? Do we have the right to end the lives of others? The first way, which is the way of the murderer, is definitely unacceptable to many people. End it all when life feels good. Maybe you will have such expectations when you are in pain, but in fact, you have not experienced pain yet. Do people really want to die like this? Is the answer no? Just like the lawyer, the conversation between two people who can foresee the future. This man will suffer from a disease in the future and will pass it on to his children. Ending his life can save three people years or even decades of suffering in the future. Painful, so is this behavior excusable? If a person is not aware of the pain in the future, then he may live with the expectation of a better tomorrow, but when it comes time to truly face the pain, he is like the old man's daughter, tortured by the disease, weak, crying, and desperate. , what choice will we make at this time? Is it okay if others come to end my suffering at this time? To be honest, I don't know either. Because speaking from personal experience, if I felt very painful at that time and the good things in life could no longer keep me going against the pain, I would probably feel like it was over.