Who can provide review methods and download real questions for EIA engineers?

After checking the results, I was surprised to see the results of my own efforts of 9 1. For this result, I want to thank many people, my family, friends and EIAFANS. Here, I would like to discuss my test feelings with the majority of candidates. If you think it's helpful, you can have a look. If you think what I said is wrong, hehe, just pollute your vision. Besides, when thousands of people eat me, I need privacy.

On the whole, I was really surprised by this result, because in the long waiting process of three and a half months, I was confident that I could get 93 points, revised my estimate of 80 points, and then doubted that I could get 72 points, until I once suspected that I failed again this year. Finally, the day before my birthday, God gave me a gift of 9 1 minute (haha, at first glance, I thought I was 765433 when I checked the score. Waiting for three and a half months is getting worse every day, until finally I feel a little bt in my heart, hehe.

My personal basic situation is that I came from an environmental professional class and worked for more than 2 years, but I didn't do much in environmental assessment. I have taken this exam twice. This year is the second year, and I passed three subjects in the first year. To state the objective fact is that the scores of the first three subjects can be said to be quite high, not the first but also the second, except that I got 68 points in the exam. I feel a little sad about this failure, because I heard someone on the forum say that you can pass the fourth door as long as you review the first three, and I did, but today I judge from my own personal experience that this statement is irresponsible and does not apply to most candidates. The first review was very serious. I began to review carefully after I came back from the Spring Festival. I've seen it before, but it's piecemeal, basically the same as not seeing it. Because there are multiple-choice questions, I focused on the first three subjects and recited a few articles. In the face of cases, 800-page books are always delayed until the last month, before I start to turn them over. I felt very painful, but I bravely finished reading it, and then I began to do the problem. The first three subjects have done supporting exercises seriously, and only the first few cases have been done, but I have not insisted on finishing them. Generally speaking, I have read the first three subjects three times, and the case is 1 time, and the result is like this. Actually, to be honest, I should have passed in 2009 because I missed 6-7 questions. Afterwards, I thought that if I had played a normal role and missed a question, my case would have passed, but I didn't regret it. The case told me with a score of 68.

I summed up the lesson afterwards. Why did my case fail? There are several reasons:

1, although I read the case book, I only read it once, and I still read it with a very rebellious attitude. I didn't see it thoroughly because I didn't like being a brick.

I didn't do case exercises. At that time, I bought 30 case studies and case simulations in Rebecca. Both books are good, but I didn't do it or do it well.

I have no ability to control the exercise time. I just glanced at the real questions and didn't write at all, let alone control the time of practice, which led to the first three exams being handed in long in advance. I was flustered during the case exam, and I didn't know what the concept of three hours for six questions was. I have looked at my watch dozens of times in the examination room, and I have to look at my watch twice for almost every event. I calculated that I had watched the exam more than 50 times.

4. I don't know whether my knowledge of the first three subjects can meet the needs of case answering, and I don't practice order and completeness, which leads to case answering, especially question answering. After writing, I felt that another expression was actually better, so I tortured myself over and over again, and I didn't know if I had finished all the answers, just wondering where to write. I didn't answer the complete concept at all. I was still reading the theme and questions, thinking back and forth, trying to add something, so that there was nothing in my stomach after I finished writing, but I still felt something was missing. This is a waste of time in the examination room caused by incomplete review.

I doubt the correctness of the examination paper issued by the Ministry too much. Hehe, the correct answer is written on the draft paper, and the wrong answer is written on the answer. I guess everyone will laugh. What's the problem? Just two small problems about judging the atmospheric grade. Well, I guess everyone will laugh at me. In fact, although I didn't know the theoretical knowledge at that time, I thought that the concentration of NO2 at that time should be calculated according to the concentration of SO2, and then I judged the grade. The correct answer is worked out on toilet paper. But on the one hand, because my theoretical knowledge is not solid, on the other hand, I think there may be mistakes in the Ministry, so I made a judgment based on SO2 and regretted coming out of the examination room.

Generally speaking, the case in 2009 failed, partly because of luck and partly because my audit was not in place. Although in 2009, I thought the ecological answer of the case was good, in fact, through the review of 10, I realized the shallowness and limitations of my cognition in 2009, and realized that my ecological answer in 2009 was actually just a scratch, and it was good to get 2 points for each small question. Let me talk about my preparation and exam at 10.

Let's talk about preparing for the exam, preparing for the exam case of 10. I only said that only the review method of the test case. The review materials include syllabus, case teaching materials, original guide, technical method teaching materials, laws and regulations teaching materials, 50 cases, Rebecca's simulation questions, Jia Shengyuan blog bound book, and real questions over the years. I'm still as serious as in 2009, and I started reading books almost years ago, because the exam time is early this year. Although we only test cases, we can't lack any criteria, methods, cases and laws, because criteria and methods are the foundation, cases are the expansion and application, and we must look at them together, and laws are the focus. The guidelines and standards are best read in the original text, and the things in the appendix are the most important, which are often detected and prone to traps, such as the strict atmospheric concentration of 50% in 2009, pollutants such as wastewater and landfill. (Sorry, it's unclear in 2009), the hazardous waste disposal center of 10 needs to be equipped with other environmental protection facilities to optimize the types of hazardous wastes accepted by this project; Division of functional zones of acoustic environment in villages of highway projects and measures for acoustic environment protection: judgment of wastewater entering the park in industrial parks; Judging whether SO2 and COD meet the standards in the acceptance questions and the implementation of the old and new standards in the acceptance investigation, these eight questions can be found in the standards, and the standards can be learned by heart. These questions can get full marks without wasting extra thinking time. For example, the content of solid waste in textbooks is far from enough. I just read the standard of solid waste this year, and I think the environmental protection facilities stipulated in the original text are very important. I have summarized all the environmental protection facilities required by the solid waste disposal site, which are unique and can be applied to any landfill and disposal site. As a result, I don't have to think about it, just write it in the form of an article. The key is not to waste time and leave out items. Only when preparing for the exam, the first three subjects don't have to be as rigid as the first four subjects. Hehe, you can recite flexibly according to the train of thought of the case and relax a little. Moreover, laws and regulations only look at some key things that may be tested, saving a lot of time.

The preparation time is not clear. It depends on my personal situation. For an idiot like me, I started preparing for the second interview years ago and spent three months. Because I read slowly, so. . . Hehe, you can adjust yourself when you study fast.

I chose four ecological courses this year, and I doubt whether I can pass them, because there are too few calculation questions and too many questions and answers this year. Even if you choose a pollution topic, I am afraid it may not be as easy to score as in previous years. Therefore, no matter whether I choose the topic of ecology or pollution this year, everyone should have a feeling that the questions and answers are not as clear as the calculation questions, and the feeling of answering questions is that I can get some points if I am wrong. I can't say that my answer is completely correct, but according to the final score of 9 1, I will deduct 12 points for three wrong questions and 17 points for the rest. Judging from the results, my score on ecological problems should be relatively high, and the possibility of full score or close to full score is not ruled out. I am still very happy about this achievement in ecological issues, because in the absence of a standard answer, through my own efforts, this achievement is an affirmation of my own efforts. This is not an accident, but a reward for sweat and suffering. Hehe, I am a stupid bird that flies first. As for how to review ecology, I can only say that I have to sum it up myself. I want to be able to establish a framework and train of thought corresponding to ecological problems in my mind, sum up * * * sex and personality, and preserve brain cells to improve efficiency and personality, so as to get a complete high score, and only I can keep summing up. You can truly understand what is meant by "the project composition should be complete, the key projects should be clear, and the whole process analysis, ecological pollution source analysis and risk analysis are the scoring points". The popular understanding is that when analyzing the impact of a project, it is necessary to analyze the composition of each project (subject, supporting, auxiliary, environmental protection, public use, emergency and so on). ), each process cycle (construction, operation, site closure or scrapping) and pollution sources. These are all things that I can realize by constantly summing up in my review. Maybe that's why I can get high marks in ecology. My thinking must be comprehensive and extensive, and I can't keep staring at it. That's just part of the choice. As for how to be comprehensive and extensive, it depends on my own summing-up ability and the depth of reading. Do you think textbooks are useful? The answer works! Because the answers to all the exams can be found in the original textbooks and guides. Do you think the textbook is perfect? The answer is not perfect, because the ideas and answers involved in a topic are not listed for you, but scattered in different chapters, different corners and different cases. If you want to sum up a relatively perfect answer, you need your own ability to sum up all the scattered knowledge points. Looking back, the cases in the original case textbook are not so perfect, and the expert's summary is occasionally lacking. For example, for example, the impact of water environment should be analyzed from the aspect of water quantity (groundwater exploitation or excavation, etc.). ), leading to groundwater leakage. Then it will affect river recharge and water quantity, and the catchment caused by dam operation will affect the water quantity of downstream rivers. ), water temperature (power plant temperature rise, reservoir water temperature stratification, low-temperature water discharged from dam), water quality (industrial and domestic sewage, soil erosion, atmospheric dustfall non-point source, material and solid waste stacking non-point source, pesticides and fertilizers, etc. ), transportation risks include cross-bridge transportation risk, seepage prevention layer rupture of landfill site, leachate overflow, dam break, underground water inrush, etc. In the flood characteristic year, there are many more, but I can't remember them clearly. Surface runoff flows through the polluted landfill, thus polluting the river water quality. I can't remember the others. There are others, such as construction period and operation period, surface water and groundwater, which should be considered. When you meet different questions, it is enough to apply relevant summaries to answer them. How to improve the speed? It is the similar summary above that should be reviewed in peacetime. I'm ashamed to say that I haven't done an ecological environmental assessment project so far. Some people say that I don't memorize cases for preparing for exams. Hehe, I think maybe I'm stupid. I don't think I can recite any of the four EIA exams. There are multiple choices in the first three subjects. Can't recite it? Case exam time is tight, do you recite it? Because I memorized the first three subjects last year, I am confident that I can pass the exam (because I can get high marks). Because I memorized it, I didn't think much about the ecological problems in this year's case exam. When I found the test center in the subject, I began to make rules in my mind, just like a machine, without thinking, because thinking was what I did before the exam, and I wanted to answer too many questions. I suffered losses in 2009, and 10 learned my lesson, hehe.

At the same time, it is very important to pay attention to terminology when answering ecological questions. Such as vegetation type, species, distribution, vegetation coverage, frequency, density, dominance, species importance, species number, biomass, biodiversity, community heterogeneity, ecosystem integrity, stability, and other terms about soil erosion, such as soil erosion modulus and area. And land, such as basic farmland occupation, farmland quality, soil type and fertility, farmland land productivity, land use direction, soil physical and chemical properties, etc. Hehe, I won't say them one by one. There is still a long time before the exam, and the moderator urged me not to turn over the books. I just give you an example. These terms are very important in answering questions.

In addition, I strongly recommend Mr. Jia Shengyuan's blog. When preparing for the exam, I downloaded and bound the contents of the EIA exam in his blog. It's beautiful, hehe, it's also used as a textbook, but it's not a basic textbook, it's a perfect textbook, and the textbook is not perfect. I was inspired by Mr. Jia's blog thinking. Don't you admire him for being an expert in ecology? Ha ha, you don't have to admire, because Mr. Jia is not perfect and his answer is not perfect, but his answer can only be summed up in four words as "benefiting a lot". I suggest you combine your textbook with his blog to sum up your ideas for answering ecological questions. To tell the truth, I really hope that my comrades can form a framework for answering ecological questions in their hearts or on paper, and can really use "sex plus personality" to achieve "changing with constancy".

In addition, in 10, I chose 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 as the topic. When handing out the test paper, I didn't even write the name or anything, so I read the test questions first. Why? Because you can read the exam questions first, and then screen the uncertain questions in your mind to confirm what you want to do when writing your name and admission ticket. I chose four ecological questions, because the first question and the sixth question have flowcharts. I haven't done these two questions, and the exam time is tight. I have a cursory look at the flow chart, and I feel very headache. I wonder if the topic involves anything in the flow chart. If it involves careful calculation of the flow chart, it will definitely delay a lot of time, and it is easy to make careless mistakes and avoid mistakes. So I crossed out these two questions when I chose the topic first. To sum up, it is easy to be simple and uncomplicated, and it is best not to touch complicated things. If you spend too much time on a question, you will basically fail this exam.

Finally, talk about the answer. I have written so much that many friends doubt that I can write so much in the examination room. Hehe, you can. It's not how fast I write, but that I haven't looked at my watch many times this year. Hehe, just kidding. I can write so many things because I summed myself up when preparing for the exam and improved my thinking. I basically write when I read the questions in the examination room, because when I review in place, my thinking has been formed and my knowledge is relatively solid, so I know the examination center when I see the questions, and I have little time to think, which greatly reduces the chance of jumping into the trap, because you know where he is easy to fall into the trap and where to read the questions quickly and carefully. Therefore, all these can save my writing time. My handwriting is not good-looking, but I can't go to Lian Bi without Lian Bi. The test is not to see who writes well, the key is to make people see clearly. As for writing, I still think we should practice the questions before the exam. You'd better write the exercises and real questions once. For error-prone topics, write several times more, and control the time of each question at 30min minutes. On the one hand, practice calligraphy, on the other hand, exercise your ability to answer questions with certainty and time control, so that you won't doubt the perfection of what you write on paper in the examination room, and you won't be flustered and have no emergency quality after a certain question is overtime in the examination room. The real questions must be well studied, such as easy to test and easy to trap. Hehe, you should practice more about calculation, such as material balance, atmospheric grade judgment (calculation plus check) and so on. Only when you do it at ordinary times will you not be flustered in the examination room. Only when you practice thoroughly at ordinary times will you have more confidence in the examination room.

Be careful in the examination room, so I won't say much about it. The examination room should carefully examine the questions, word for word, and I don't need to say more. Friends who have suffered losses should have experience.

Finally, talk about several controversial topics this year and how I personally answered them.

1, bridge This is not feasible because of wastewater pollution during construction and risks during operation.

2. Acoustic environment. Zhangjiacun 1 class; The range of Li Jiacun from the red line 50m is 4a, and the other is 1.

3. Sulfur dioxide. Feasible. The total installed capacity is 5.6MW, and the height of exhaust pipe is required; 200m range 3 m; Emission concentration, according to the standard statement, the three items meet the requirements respectively.

4、COD。 The total amount is not up to standard.

The above answer, according to the score given to me now, compares the previous evaluation score with the current evaluation score.

A. this bridge I used to estimate 0 points. Oh, I'm really crazy. I didn't even consider the test sites of drinking water source protection areas during the exam, because when I saw the test questions, my mind was full of test sites for risk assessment. I didn't know that everyone was controversial until I finished the exam. The controversial matter has nothing to do with me. I don't know if I'm right, so I can't evaluate the points so far.

B, acoustic environment. It was estimated that the score was 0 before, but now I think it may be given a little, because I am not sure whether it is 1 or class 2, because it is class 1 in principle in the standard, and there are expressways that can achieve class 2 through "OK", so I think the answer to 1 is correct. One thing I want to say is, should we consider whether the first row of houses in Li Jiacun has more than three floors or less? My answer above is that it is applicable below the third floor. I don't think I've discussed anything more than three floors. Anyway, I won't get full marks. It is good to give 2~3 points.

Carbon, sulfur dioxide. It used to be 5 points, but it is still 5 points now, but I want to make a point. Judging from the test proposition, I personally think that the standard answer of the test should be up to standard. As for the reasons, as I said in the previous post, I think the purpose of the test center is to test three reasons. If the list is incomplete and incorrect, points will be deducted. This test is to compare three standards for judging whether the boiler atmosphere reaches the standard at the same time. At the same time, the height of my exhaust pipe is judged according to the total installed capacity of 2*2.8=5.6MW, which I think is a trap. If you judge according to 2.8, you may lose points.

Cash on delivery. It was estimated to be 3 points before, but it is still 3 points now, because my answer is not comprehensive. Look carefully, the topic is "evaluation meets the standard", not "judge the standard and explain the reason" Therefore, if you "evaluate", you should write both the concentration that meets the standard and the total amount that does not meet the standard. 2 points will be deducted if the concentration is not up to standard.

Do your best, please don't torture me any more. Privacy is very important to me, hehe. In addition, I declare that I am a girl, so don't guess my gender. The host urged me urgently. A good man helped me a lot. He is my first tutor on the road of EIA. This gratitude is beyond words. I owe him a favor. I wrote it all night. It's 2 o'clock in the morning, and I've been writing for three hours. It's midnight. Maybe my mind is a little confused. I didn't look back at what I wrote. I hope it will help you a little.

As for me, I always believe in God's reward for diligence. If I still believe in luck in the 2009 exam, then at 10, I completely got rid of luck, because relying on luck also means that you are facing failure. For people who have been so unlucky in recent years, the luck in 2009 is far away from me. Some people say that it is better to answer calculation questions, so many people don't review ecological questions very much. Well, actually, I think this is a misunderstanding, but it may not be. When choosing multiple-choice questions, you should look at what kind of calculation questions are, for example, there are few pollution-related questions this year, but there are many questions to answer, and sometimes the calculation questions are still difficult, such as the material balance in 2008. If you choose such a question and do it for more than 50 minutes, you may not have done it right. Hehe, as long as you review well, you can get high marks on ecological problems, can't you? I didn't have the confidence to say this before the score came out, because I was still wondering if I could pass, because I didn't see the standard answer when I reviewed, and I didn't dare to judge the consistency between my answer and the standard answer. The reason why I say this now is to tell you an objective situation with graded scores. Therefore, some people hold the idea that calculation problems can be passed, and it is estimated that it depends on their luck in that year to see if there are enough calculation problems for you to do, unlike this year, there are only a few calculation problems; There are enough calculation problems for you to do, and it depends on whether the calculation problems are easy or whether you can skip the trap, such as the material balance in 2008 and the atmospheric evaluation grade determination in 2009. If there are so many calculation problems, you can do them right. Congratulations, you are very lucky this year, hehe.

Thank you to many people here, and those who silently bless me, thank you!