Analysis and Sharing of Problems in Property Management

Recently, the problem of peripheral parking is still in a stalemate. The property has informed the shops and owners that parking is prohibited outside. However, shops and car owners ignored them and stopped their cars.

In order to standardize parking, effectively manage, buy stone pillars and rectify the peripheral parking mode, the principle is not to stop. Shops and owners don't cooperate. For many days, vertical holes have been dug and stone pillars have not been installed.

Tell the supervisor in this field, is there any difference between the newly bought stone pillar and the cement stone pier that was still in use before? The main problem is how to install the stone pillars. Because the fire escape at the gate cannot be blocked, there must be a movable entrance and exit. So, how to install this entrance? If it is still the same as before, shops and car owners can still move out by force and drive away.

Supervisor (voice) reply:

You don't have to worry about that. I don't know, either. The company is an outsourcing construction team. When the construction is completed, you will know, and so will I.

I said, I don't care about anything It's the setting of the fire escape. By then, it will not only achieve the management purpose, but also facilitate our daily operation.

As I said, I don't know about this plan. When they finish building, we will know how to operate it. I can't change this, and I can't interfere. Because someone made a plan. We will know when the construction will be completed in two days.

Believe that the supervisor is telling the truth. But the attitude of the supervisor makes me very depressed. I just reflect the problem normally. As for whether to invite a construction team, how to outsource, how to buy materials and so on. , I don't care, also can't tube.

The lukewarm attitude of the supervisor reminds me that if you take the opportunity to spend money, you just don't have the money to give us a year-end bonus. Although I have no investigation and evidence, I can doubt the whereabouts and rationality of property fees.

There is no money to pay the year-end bonus. The informal explanation is that the head office took the money to develop and operate new real estate. When the property market is not hot, why not tighten but expand investment? A: It needs the continuity of the development of the real estate market. The authority of land use is difficult to ride a tiger. High-sounding, not unreasonable

And what we should care about is: how is it possible without money? Property fees are collected as usual every month, and the money is certain, only more and not less. So where did the money go? He said that he threw it in, or that someone pocketed it because of the confusion of names. In any case, it should not be an excuse to reduce employee welfare.

Of course, there is no provision in France for the issuance of year-end awards. But it's customary. It's been a difficult year, so you have to show something. What is the behavior of investing money in new projects, regardless of the interests of employees? This is not capitalism, is it not exploitation?

I watched a small video recently, which was quite right. Employee's boss: Why don't employees get off work when the boss doesn't? Employees leave work on time, with a monthly salary of three or four thousand yuan. What is the boss's salary? Without our employees, you can be a chicken feather boss.

Yes, without employees, where can I get a boss?

Some people may say that employees should be grateful.

Stop joking.

In a word, this is mainly a question of fairness and equality. Employees and bosses complement each other.

But in reality? The boss is above, and employees work hard for the boss, earning meager wages and accepting all kinds of inequalities.

Recently, the property held a fire drill, requiring all employees to participate. The time is from five to six in the afternoon. We work the night shift, and usually five o'clock is the time to get up, wash and prepare dinner. I rested the day before and came out during the day just to have more free time. I must come back early because I have to ask for leave.

I said, the time can be postponed until six o'clock. Later, I learned that six o'clock is the time for the leaders to get off work. In order not to delay the work of the leaders, the exercise began at five o'clock.

Then, you can sacrifice employees' non-working hours and ask for early attendance. Why? Just because leaders are leaders and employees are employees? Bullshit. Excuse me: where is fairness? Who stipulated it?

After the drill, the form is greater than the content.

The leadership demands this and that, the form is there, the leadership is glamorous, and the political achievements are there. As for the hard work of employees, we can ignore it.

For example, the year-end award. Say March first, then April, and June at the latest. June has passed. The year-end award has finally become a bubble, hopeless. The fact is clear: this is the usual trick of smart leaders. If you can fool, fool.

Besides, do it or not. For the flow of mobile personnel, it has no effect on the leadership in essence. Besides, the boss has a big waist and is not afraid of not recruiting people. Yes, if you don't do it, someone else will.

The disunity of the bottom employees is divided into two factions. A pile of sand. Alas, I just can't stand the servility and coquetry of some people

Today, the shift supervisor will have a meeting. It is said that a sleeping post was photographed by the owner the day before yesterday and posted among the owners. Last night, E accused found a sleep post, pointed out the criticism and said the punishment.

Therefore, it is announced that management will be strengthened from July. If you sleep on duty again, you will be punished correctly. Also, post discipline, image and so on should be strengthened.

I feel very uncomfortable when I hear this. What's wrong?

It is not a punishment for sleeping in other people's posts, but a requirement for us.

There is nothing wrong with the request. However, where are our benefits? Without the year-end bonus, it is still required that the rules and regulations are designed for front-line employees. The foreman can't do it, and he can't set an example first. How does he convince the public?

I mean, I hope to improve our welfare benefits. Only when welfare benefits are raised to a certain level can management be strictly required. Whoever violates it will be punished. This is the guarantee of benign management.

You can't let employees get three or four thousand salaries, but also let their services reach the star level. Unrealistic.

If you want a horse to run, you have to let it eat grass.

The truth is the truth But in reality, employees are in a weak position. Is it a joke for the weak to talk about fairness with the strong?

The result of each "injury" will only prompt one party to leave the weight. Since it can't be changed, leaving is also a helpless choice. We should awaken our self-awareness, strive for and resist, so as to gain more legitimate rights and interests of our own.