Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - Talk show 4: Rachel's boss's content has been edited again. What do you think is the reason?

Talk show 4: Rachel's boss's content has been edited again. What do you think is the reason?

Rachel's boss's content was re-edited, mainly because of bumps. I have seen this joke several times in two days. If I hadn't seen this problem, I wouldn't have found that what I saw the next day was cut off from the drinking part. Other talk show actors accused this passage of plagiarism.

However, I think the part suitable for drinking has been cut off. I felt a little embarrassed when I saw it for the first time, not as funny as other parts. Moreover, the joke of drinking is logically untenable if it is related to the context. The boss invited the employees to drink, and the joke clearly said that it was a bottle of Maotai. Later, it was said that if three people in the whole company shared a bottle of Maotai, the amount would not be as small as spitting. Although this joke may be exaggerated, it is not rigorous enough after all. So cutting it actually makes the whole paragraph stand up, which is quite good.

Obviously, Rachel and clockwork orange are very similar, that is, they can be distinguished by comparison. I don't think as a creator who makes a living from manuscripts, he would be stupid enough to commit such obvious plagiarism, obviously copying the jokes of his peers in the talk show directly. As we all know, it is difficult to judge plagiarism in literary and artistic works because works can learn from each other well.

So far, Rachel's performance has not been affected by this short paragraph, but this paragraph is actually more risky. I tend to have two views on this incident. First of all, Rachel really hit the nail on the head herself. The second is that he is not the complete creator of this text. Someone added this paragraph, he didn't know. As a leader in the talk show industry, Xiaoguo's manuscript review is still not rigorous enough. There is still a long way to go for the industry to define the standard of plagiarism in talk shows.

There is a big difference between these two paragraphs, that is, hanging cups, licking and volatilizing a few stalks. These three rotten stems are very old stems and are often used for drinking. It is estimated that this terrier is older than both parents combined. The usage of the scene stalks described by these two people is also completely different. It's embarrassing to say that the collision stalk is far-fetched If you want to say your original lines, you can't say them again with old terrier jokes. Others don't need it. This guy wants to be red and crazy, which is not afraid of shameful things.