Talk show conference 4: Rachel's talk show is abridged. What was deleted?

What was deleted was Rachel's boss's content. Some netizens pointed out that Rachel's toast to the leader in the program was said at the opening of Qingdao Rachel's special session, and Rachel was suspected of plagiarism. Therefore, Rachel realized that he had hit a stalk and his time was ahead. I wanted to avoid suspicion, so I found the program group at the first time and removed this paragraph.

At the fourth talk show conference, Rachel's boss content was deleted by the program group. Now all the official videos of Rachel's talk show have been deleted. What is the reason for deletion?

For the northeast people, this kind of "drinking less" scene and joke can be said to be quite reasonable. Is it okay? But this doesn't mean that the words are arranged so closely that there is no suspicion, and it is also a coincidence that this joke was told by the opening actor of his own special performance? Even if, let's just say, what Rachel said is true. Is it really a "bump"? Hulan, for example, actually ran into many problem solvers on Zhihu, but as a comedy performance, it must have its own reprocessing.

There is a great distance between jokes and performances. To say the least, is it possible for the same predictable theme to converge and evolve under the same framework of drama creation? I think there is, and it's so likely, even a little funny, that you don't even know that you probably copied it.

You may have heard the arrangement of the core punch line of a joke somewhere, or just similar logic, but you deliberately left an impression, but you didn't deliberately remember it. Later, when you were writing, you inadvertently remembered this quip or logic, which is very, very possible, because the mature creative skills of comedy are still very repeatable.

I believe everyone has a similar life experience, that is, your idea has long been thought of. After all, China has a population of1400 million. But even if Rachel is really such a pure lump, he should be very suspicious. After all, Gua Tian can't take the lead. Rachel could have embodied the logic of this joke in other scenes and other conflict ways, but he didn't. The core punch line is still the same as the scene itself. I'm sure I don't believe you when you say he doesn't listen to his own special performance at all.