What do you mean by high marks and low abilities? Can you give me an example?

There is a joke, probably that the neighbor aunt praised her son for his good grades and wanted to go to a big company for an interview. The hero is considering whether to pass the interview. As a result, many people began to advocate the theory of "reading is useless", saying that those with good grades will not work for those with poor grades in the end. Some people also take the ancient imperial examination as an example: some people have listed two lists, one is a scholar who is not very famous in the Qing Dynasty, and the other is a scholar who did not rank first in the imperial examination in the Qing Dynasty and later became a historical celebrity. Then I showed it to everyone, and found that everyone didn't know the top scholars, only the scholars who landed. This can tell the children who are about to take the college entrance examination that they don't need to succeed in the college entrance examination, and they can become famous if they fail.

This society, as they say, "high score must be low energy" and "low score must be high energy"? That's not true. In the final analysis, it is only a lie that the weak are paralyzed by themselves. "High scores and low energy" and "low scores and high energy" certainly exist, but they are certainly not omnipotent. There is a concept in statistics called "survivor bias", which refutes this common logical fallacy. This refuted logical fallacy means that we can only see the results of a certain screening, but we don't know the process of screening, so we ignore the key information screened out.

We only see the success of these "legends" and some factors we want to see, such as poor academic performance; But I can't see the bright spot of these people. People with low scores and high energy must have high scores in some aspects, and those with high scores have better study habits, thinking ability and self-discipline than those with low scores. "Legend" is only a minority. Those who deceive themselves with "high marks and low abilities" must first realize that you are not a legend. This argument of "survivor bias" exaggerates the uselessness of reading with very few cases and exaggerated narratives. They use individual cases instead of ordinary cases, and regard the "not learning" part of individual successful people's mistakes in the learning process as an important reason for their success, while ignoring the talents and opportunities that such successful people really rely on for success, thus creating false illusions to confuse and encourage a large number of students to let themselves go.

So in the final analysis, "high scores and low abilities" is often a way for the weak to paralyze themselves. They don't want to admit that they are inferior to others, so they constantly enlarge some "cases" similar to themselves-"low scores" in an attempt to demonstrate the fallacy of "high scores and low energy" and "low scores and high energy".