After giving birth to triplets, a woman laughed and scolded her husband when she saw the gender of the children! Is the daughter really her father’s lover in his previous life?

After giving birth to triplets, a woman laughed and scolded her husband when she saw the gender of the children! The daughter is the lover of the father in his previous life. I don’t think you should take this sentence seriously. First of all, the love parents have for their children is innate and the most normal. It does not necessarily involve the love between men and women. Secondly, I think the main point of this sentence is that a father loves his daughter just like he loves his lover. In addition, this is just a joke and cannot withstand scrutiny. ?

Recently, a woman gave birth to triplets. After hearing the news, her husband couldn’t help but burst out laughing. He hugged the daughters and was unwilling to let go. The woman asked jokingly Husband, I owed so many love debts in my previous life. In fact, what this woman means is that her daughter was her father’s lover in his previous life. After giving birth to so many daughters in this life, it seems that her husband has quite a lot of lovers. In fact, I think this statement is just a joke. The reason why I say this is that I have the following opinions.

First of all, the love that parents have for their children is innate and the most normal, and it does not necessarily involve the love between men and women. As a mother, loving her children is maternal love, and a father loving his children is fatherly love. This kind of love is flesh and blood, family affection, and has nothing to do with the so-called love, let alone a lover. I think this kind of feeling is very normal and a kind of nature. There is no need to take it as a lover.

Secondly, I think the main point of this sentence is that a father loves his daughter just like he loves his lover. If I really want to explain it, I think I just want to describe how a father dotes on his daughter just like he dotes on his lover, relying on him for everything and holding him in the palm of his hand. Among the two relationships, this is the only one that is similar and can be compared slightly, but it is not exactly the same.

In addition, this is just a joke and cannot withstand scrutiny. I think this is just a folk joke. It's something that everyone uses as a joke, but it doesn't stand up to scrutiny at all. There's no need to take it seriously. If everyone just laughs it off after hearing this sentence, don't really think about whether they were lovers in the previous life.

The above are some of my relevant views on this sentence.