One of my relatives, riding a "Haojue 125" motorcycle after drinking, went straight from east to west and collided head-on with a taxi that was turning around.

1, the landlord said: the taxi driver did not agree to advance the medical expenses.

A: From a legal point of view, the taxi driver's behavior is legal.

According to the current law, the person liable for compensation only has the responsibility and obligation to pay compensation, but not to pay any expenses in advance.

According to the Road Traffic Safety Law, if someone is injured in the accident, compensation will be made after the treatment or disability appraisal is completed.

The landlord said: the taxi driver said that my relatives would not be investigated for drinking.

A: The taxi driver's statement is a joke! He thought that whether he was investigated for drunk driving was a matter of a certain department, and taxi drivers had no right to investigate at all. He said not to pursue it, which makes no sense at all!

3. The landlord asked: What should I do?

A: This question is simple: rescue the injured quickly!

If the landlord has difficulty in paying the medical expenses, he can report it to the traffic control department, and the traffic control department will come forward to contact the other party's insurance company or social assistance agency, and they will pay the treatment expenses in advance. This is the responsibility and obligation of the traffic control department stipulated by law.

4. The landlord asked: What about the accident department?

A: This matter should not be the concern of the landlord.

The responsibility of the accident department is to determine the responsibility of the accident through on-site investigation, interview with insiders, vehicle technical appraisal, etc., and issue the "Confirmation of Road Accident Responsibility".

5. The landlord asked: Who is responsible for this accident?

A: Only the traffic control department can answer this question, and only their answers are valid. Everyone's answers here are of no practical value.

If it is as the landlord said: the taxi double yellow line turns around. Then the taxi driver should bear the main responsibility.

Say one more thing:

1, a little suspicious: the landlord failed to tell the truth of the accident. How did the taxi driver collide with the motorcycle when he turned around? Personally, I think there is only one possibility: a head-on collision, that is, a motorcycle going backwards. If so, then the motorcycle is the main responsibility, at least equally.

2. The motorcycle drivers listed by the landlord are "seriously injured, with multiple head fractures and brain tissue injuries, and have undergone craniotomy, but now they are in a coma", "no family (36-year-old male)" and "one brother and two sisters". None of this has anything to do with accident responsibility! It has nothing to do with responsibility identification.

3. driving without a license, a relative of the landlord, went retrograde on the road after drinking, which seriously violated the road traffic safety law and required sanctions and punishment.