Ask for the meaning of an ancient prose? Laozi

What do you mean, "if you don't do it for virtue, the people won't fight"? Why did Laozi put forward the view of "heartlessness"?

Not advocating talents does not mean that society does not need talents.

In fact, everyone is a genius and everyone is a saint. This is a fact. Because everyone is created by nature and has his own potential and unique talents and specialties, just like all kinds of flowers, trees, insects, fish, birds and animals, they all have their own indispensable values in maintaining the natural ecology of society.

However, once this society regards personal talents and specialties as universal values, it will inevitably lead to the inconsistency between personal natural needs and inner desires, as well as the inconsistency between personal actual ability and expected ability.

This inconsistency will inevitably lead to personal inner conflicts, and then lead to social contradictions and struggles, which will inevitably lead to the imbalance of social ecology.

Contradictions and struggles will inevitably lead to opportunism, fraud, vanity, deceiving the world and stealing reputation.

Therefore, people who don't respect talents-that is, when people don't regard each other's value standards as their own, their potential can be maximized and inner conflicts can be minimized. In this way, human contradictions and disputes will naturally be solved to the maximum extent, and a natural, harmonious, stable and prosperous society will be realized.

Therefore, when I said, "Don't use morality to make the people do not dispute", I meant: Don't give full play to your potential like making idols and stars, so that you can stand out in some aspects and make great achievements.

Or mold people with high fame and status into universal models of personal values that are above the people's minds, so as to eliminate conflicts within individuals and finally avoid social contradictions and disputes.

-

Nan: Always talking about the third chapter of Tao Te Ching (1)

chapter three

Without Shang Xian, the people will not dispute; Expensive and rare goods, so that people do not steal; If you can't see what you want, you won't be chaotic.

It is the rule of saints, which can hollow out their hearts, strengthen their bellies, weaken their aspirations and strengthen their bones. It often makes people ignorant and have no desire. ambassador

Wise men dare not do it, or they will die if they don't.

When I was young, I looked down on wise men.

The third chapter is to apply the law of heaven and earth to the development of world governance. The text of this chapter,

Knowing Chang Xiao is easy to understand and explain. However, there are three points that need special attention, that is

"There is no Shang Xian, which makes people indisputable; Expensive and rare goods, so that people do not steal; If you can't see what you want, you won't be chaotic. "

When reading books above the Qin and Han dynasties, we should carefully understand the word "person", think carefully, distinguish it, and don't think.

The word "min" is a common people, which is associated with the meaning of "nation" in modern language. If so, the concept is over.

All wrong. The word "person" in ancient books means "person" or "person" in modern language. that

At that time, there was not much vocabulary, and there were diversions and borrowings every time. In fact, the word "person" is a code for everyone.

If you don't know this concept clearly, it is easy to misunderstand it as a title of "Shang Xia" and become an ancient imperial system.

The tone of the healer.

The second chapter is about how to be a man in life, taking Heaven as an example, "do what you do without hesitation, live without doing it" and try your best.

Spare no effort to contribute. But I never care about fame and fortune. If I succeed, I live for myself. This is persistence.

Heaven and earth are infinite, and the spirit that breeds all things can only be given, without the slightest tendency to possess.

There is no relative requirement for return. If people can follow the example of heaven and earth, this is the highest moral demeanor.

If I think I contribute too much, others' income is too cheap, and I get too little back, that is

There is a resentment of resigning from work and complaining about others, which is the spirit of learning from heaven.

As a result of the application of this principle, when it comes to human governance of the world, it is first proposed that "there is no Shang Xian,

Let the people do not dispute "principle. But we need to understand that at that time, Laozi was in the Spring and Autumn Period, the society at that time.

The social structure is changing. At the beginning of Zhou Dynasty, the mining field system was no longer suitable for the development of society at that time. Therefore, in the Spring and Autumn Period

Dai entered a period of power struggle and social upheaval. When we study history, it is obvious that whenever

In the chaotic society, the so-called moral benevolence and righteousness, these normative interpersonal relationships will inevitably be affected and destroyed.

On the contrary, troubled times are also the cradle of talents and academic thoughts. Take the famous western saying, the so-called "philosophy"

Scientists and thinkers also came into being in this chaotic era, which is almost the same throughout history.

For example.

At the same time, like the great turmoil in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the governors of every country and the leaders of every region followed suit.

Recruit talented people everywhere, and regard the wise as the capital to fight for power and profit and dominate the country. So at that time,

"Sages among scholars"-people with talent, knowledge and great skills are of course valued. Shang,

It means to value admiration. "Xian" is the general name of talents, morality and learning.

For example, Confucius, a representative figure of Confucianism, flaunted "Jun Yu" although he did not particularly value sages. Confucius wrote.

It is difficult to draw a conclusion whether the concept of "gentleman" summarizes saints. But then Mencius made it very clear

The importance of saints and almighty. The so-called "sage in power, capable people in power" is his name.

Why do I have such a view? If we understand Mo Zhai, who was juxtaposed with Taoism and Confucianism in Qin and Han Dynasties,

-Mozi thought, nature is easy to understand the key.

As we all know, Confucianism, Mohism and Taoism had a great influence on China culture before Qin and Han Dynasties.

Go home. Mozi emphasized "Shang Xian" in his philosophy of social politics at that time. Advocate the use of sages

In charge of everything. Because what he saw at that time was the decline of society, bullying everywhere, fighting for power and profit, and running amok.

Most of them are not moral and learned people to lead political governance, so he advocates "Shang Xian" and "Shang Tong".

His "similarity" has nothing to do with the similarity of Confucius' "great harmony" thought in Li Yunpian.

There is also a little connection. His "identity" is similar to the concept of equality mentioned by later generations. What modern people say.

The idea of equality was put forward by Mozi in the early Warring States period in the ancient culture of China. But in India, Sakyamuni

The theory of equality of all beings was put forward earlier.

Now we are not discussing the theme of Mozi, but paying special attention to Mozi's "Shang Xian" proposition here.

Why is it very similar to the concept of Confucian Mencius, but completely opposite to the thought of Taoist Laozi? This is the reason

The evolution of the historical era has stimulated the similarities and differences between ideas and academics. Mozi was a Song poet in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and the Song State was

Descendants of Yin Shang. Moreover, in terms of the national conditions of Mozi's Song State at that time, compared with the decline of general vassal states, there was only one.

Even worse. The chaos of a society, a country and an era is complicated in many germanium complexes.

One of the reasons. The biggest source of confusion is man-made personnel problems. Especially those in power, are insignificant.

People are not gentlemen, what's going on in the world, don't ask.

Therefore, later poets all lamented that "since Lu is dead, he is either a traitor or a woman"! lutecium (Lu)

The sudden fall means that Confucius saw the China cultural system from the three generations to the "depressed and literary" Zhou Dynasty among his parents.

The state of Lu has begun to deteriorate and decline. The regime of Lu, the descendant of Duke Zhou, is a traitor because

He had no choice but to leave the motherland with tears in his eyes and travel abroad. From then on, history can never be restored.

More than three generations of peaceful scenes. Similarly, historical facts of past dynasties tell us that everything that undermines social stability is caused by history.

The turmoil of history and culture again and again is probably caused by "either traitors or women". Therefore, Mozi's proposition is

In view of the conclusions he knew, saw and felt at that time, he shouted for "Shang Xian" and

Shang Tong.

And in Lao zi? The Spring and Autumn Period he saw was the period when the troubled times began to decline, and the troubled times had been flooded and artificial.

Yes. Therefore, he went further and profoundly pointed out that the "Shangxian" folk prescription for treating diseases at that time had consequences.

The sequelae are great. It is difficult to draw a conclusion on the standards of talents from ancient times to the present. But the result of praising saints will lead to Xu

What a disguise. At that time, in order to dominate, the governors of various countries tried their best to attract talents from all over the world at all costs.

Wisdom. All wise people are collectively called "sages". And the more such sages, the more chaotic the world is.

The harder it is to level. Therefore, he pointed out the idea of "without Shang Xian, let the people contend".

Distinguish between virtuous and immoral gentlemen and villains

At this point, it will be easier to understand if we temporarily push Laozi away and introduce the stories of three descendants.

I made a statement about my intention.

First, the Southern Song Dynasty famous Confucian Zhang Nanxuan (swab) and Song Xiaozong's answer:

Song Xiaozong said: A rare minister. Juventus Canon wrote a piece of advice, saying that your majesty should invite a sensible minister.

I don't want to get things done. If you just want to do less, it may not be this person who is defeated by your majesty.

Knowing things is the vernacular in the Tang and Song Dynasties, and the modern language means "being sensible". Zhang Nanxuan's Construction of Song Xiaozong

In discussion, we should use sensible people, not only those who can do things but are not sensible, but also a famous saying with earnest heart. also

This is the key point that leaders and politicians must understand.

First, Feng Menglong wrote in "A Brief Introduction to Ancient and Modern Times":

Yesterday Fu Jia Chuan (Sun Piyang, Fuping, with the same word Uncle Xiao, Jiajing Jinshi, worshipped the official department ministers,

On the day he ascended the throne, all scholars invited him to be taught. Sun said: there is nothing difficult about being an official, just.

Make trouble. If you are a real minister, don't be an official! "

There are talented people in the world, and wise people are rare. A talented and capable person has the wisdom of Gao Mingxiao affairs and does not show off.

One's own strengths, not unconventional, are really rare to guide the situation and lead the way into a great sage in view of the disadvantages of danger.

Take Zhuge Liang as a sage, and there will be no successor when he dies, and he will never regret it. Although Wei Ting and Li Yan are also talented people, Zhuge Liang

I'm afraid they'll make more trouble, so I dare not reuse them. This is proof.

One is a story written by Liu E in The Travels of Lao Can in the late Qing Dynasty. In order to admire the greatness of honest officials

Name, do not hesitate to go out of Beijing to visit and verify in person. But the result disappointed him. So he came to a conclusion:

"Nine times out of ten what's going on in the world is the traitor's fault. There are six or seven people who are mistaken for a gentleman who is ignorant of the world. " This is from again.

On the other hand, talented and capable people are rarely described.

In order to solve this problem, in the early Qing dynasty, the Qianlong dynasty supervised the bears (southern propaganda).

Question and answer, wrote a more in-depth paper, you can temporarily borrow it as a conclusion:

I'm going to press: it's not good to wipe my brain. And the number of so-called "ministers who do things improperly"

Language is not without mistakes.

There are people in the world who want to do things but don't understand, which is enough to cause trouble. There are some things in the world that you know and don't do.

People who do things are particularly worried and lazy.

Gaichen respects eating afterwards, sees things clearly, and is braver in doing things; Light without courage is service.

When you do something, you have no respect for it first, and you want it to be helpful and effective.

In fact, the word "respect for things" is both true and false, and it is necessary to do things. Be cautious and cautious in age.

The person in charge of the body, about the right or wrong of one thing, plans everything before and after, and then does it.

One. Both the government and the people are blessed by it. Because the court relied on its merits and regarded it as a veritable governor.

If the husband is conceited and smart, admired all his life and not used, he also has the right to delay his career.

It attaches importance to its right and wrong, and every time it is called the future, it will be vigorous and promising. Once in charge, just wait and see.

After a few days of thinking about life, I began to think, I am accommodating and indifferent.

He didn't know if it was possible, but he didn't dare to send it, or he refused to send it because of obstacles.

It is a theory of knowing things to help yourself, but it is a clever embellishment.

People also regard it as a small minister, and everything within a city is slack because of it. In a county, and then a

Things in the county ended like this. If you run fast, you can't go forward bravely. Division case, you can't.

It is comprehensive and appropriate. Taking him as a minister is even more harmful.

Entrusted by the imperial court, the husband and minister should resolutely take the affairs of the world as their own responsibility and cooperate with others.

Being a Thai friend with one heart and one mind is also a rich person. If you can't do things in a down-to-earth way, but perfunctory,

It is wise to keep a low profile, a leopard cannot change his spots.

Taking being a man as an important task and letting it develop, you will be tired and afraid to be straight on weekdays.

People who speak seriously, and then regard them as the same kind, absurd as praise, long-term habit, frankness and shameless,

Morale was destroyed by it.

Therefore, it is easy to say, "Wang Chen stumbled and the bandits bowed" and "stayed up all night, taking things as one person".

Husband is a courtier, and bandits bow and encourage themselves. It's a personal matter, so you must guard yourself at night. Is it a question of ignorance?

Those who don't do things get what they get.

If you want it, it's nothing more than a reason. Those who don't take things for granted but express their opinions in vain make things worse.

He is a minister who makes trouble, but he is not a minister who does things.

The so-called handlers are worthy of their own ability to handle affairs, not ignorant and clear-headed.

I think Zhang Wan was afraid that Song Xiaozong would mistake him for a troublemaker. He should just say, Your Majesty.

The minister who wants to do things is mostly in the minister who knows things. Then the heart is enough to know things, but the body

Enough to do things. Both body and mind are used by the country, and helping the government depends on the people.

As the three stories in the history quoted earlier, we can know that for the sages who "choose talents and be able"

It is difficult to define standards. Take morality as the standard? Is benevolence and righteousness the standard? Or is it based on talent?

In any case, the result will be used by the bad guys. With the establishment of positive standards, there will be a pattern of counterfeiting on the opposite side.

Now Therefore, the ancients said: "The combination of one sentence is the donkey pole through the ages." Say a word, a truth, just like you.

There is a fixed pile to tie up valuable things. But I'm used to it, whether it's a donkey or a donkey.

It's an eagle dog, or it can be tied. That's the way it is. It's natural.

In fact, we know that it is not the key whether it is better to be an immortal or an immortal.

Its focus is on a leading class, whether it is politics, education or anything, if it is not specially publicized.

According to a certain standard, a typical and intelligent person will follow the natural trend; incapable

People also live in peace. If we flaunt what a good person is, we will fight for it.

The goal of a good man is to win the model of that good man by any means. If you win a model of a good person by means.

Type, in the process of dispute, it makes the personnel disorder. Therefore, Lao Tzu proposed that "without Shang Xian, the people will not dispute",

Not the irony of negative thoughts.

In addition, as a branch of Taoism, Legalism is closely related to Laozi and Zhuangzi's thoughts. Legalists are the most famous.

Everything is wrong. Putting forward a theory can be said to be the same as Laozi's concept of "no Shang Xian, let the people contend".

Extended play, but he advocates that the rule of law leads the society, and does not necessarily need to flaunt the politics of sage morality. He said:

"Lovers are more famous than haters, and haters are more than the party. When fame is disputed, the Lord is confused. This family has a regular business,

Are you hungry? State-owned regular law, although dangerous, will not die. If the law is abandoned for private purposes, then the minister will not embellish his intelligence and wisdom, and the law will be untenable. "

He said that the psychology of human society is very strange. We like "Bizhou" each other, and we are shoulder to shoulder ("Bizhou")

Writing is like a person walking in front, and I catch up from behind. This is called "finish". If the word "bi" is in the opposite direction,

It becomes a "back". You go this way and I go that way, which is the opposite. Know how to write this word,

You can understand the meaning of calling "friends traitors" in later generations. "Zhou" is a circle. Two or three people love each other,

It becomes an invisible circle. If someone asks his friend, "How is Lao Zhang?" He said, "I

That friend is very good, very good. "If someone says that his friend is not good, he will quarrel with others. On the contrary,

"There are more people who hate each other than the party, but they are different." Those who hate themselves will join forces with others to attack themselves.

In fact, it is difficult for human society to have absolute standards for right and wrong between people. In a leading position

People should be careful to distinguish between slanders of mutual hatred and praises of mutual love, and don't listen to them.

Confused. If preconceived, once this deviation falls, people will be confused.

In the past, some people criticized us in China and overseas Chinese communities, saying, "When two China people are together, there are three opinions.

This shows that ethnic disunity in China is the biggest shortcoming. "I said:" this is not necessarily, as long as it is human, two.

When people are together, there will be three opinions. "For example, a couple sometimes have several different opinions, just

Love is the bond of love, leading to reconciliation, or one party giving up his opinion. Another example is a big family with many people.

Brothers and sisters, sometimes impulsive, quarrel with each other, it is really difficult to determine who is right and who is wrong, only one principle can be cited.

For a long time, both sides have been at fault in any dispute. Therefore, Legalists advocate leadership and oppose left and right.

Defamation is impartial only if it is arbitrary according to law and not confused by preference.

Han Fei expanded from a family phenomenon to a country, saying that "the family has a regular business, although it is hungry.

State-owned regular law, although dangerous, will not die. If the law is abandoned for private purposes, then the minister will not embellish his intelligence and wisdom, and the law will be untenable. "That's it.

One of the keys to representing legalist thought is not to flaunt sage politics. They think that people are ordinary people after all.

Legal equality should be based on the rule of man. This truth is exactly the same as Lao Tzu's "Without Shang Xian, let the people contend".

They complement each other and set each other off. Therefore, legalist thought does come from Taoism.

Discrimination between Taoism and Legalism

The evolution of human history, in parallel with academic thought, seems very interesting and really unbelievable.

Things: there are right and wrong, right and wrong. Right and wrong are all due to the differences in time, space and personnel evolution.

There are also differences between them. It also belongs to Taoism-raccoon dog, if we only follow the traditional view and don't talk about research.

Then, his life, he is older than Lao Tzu, should belong to the times, and be with-Lu.

People who enjoy equal prestige are also strategists or political advisers of Zhou Wenwang. But he advocated the need to use sages,

And put forward the importance of the wise. For example, "the holy king is in power, there are scholars in a hundred miles, and there is nothing left." Wang Dao's decline, 100 thousand

There are scholars in the room, so they are on a par. "

What he means is that in ancient times, people's hearts were very simple, and there was no need to flaunt truth or anything like that.

In ancient times, the sage was in power, and even a person with good moral knowledge within a hundred miles was in vain.

Like a useless person. Because at that time, everyone was a good person, and everyone was similar, so why bother?

Please invite some sages to govern the world! For example, a society is completely law-abiding, with no criminals and criminals.

Things, you don't have to prevent and manage those criminals. But he also said that the royal power declined and the society changed.

Chaos, if there is a wise man thousands of miles away, we should also find him at once and fight side by side with him to rule the world.

Judging from Xunzi's theory, it's not bad at all. For example, born in the prosperous Tang Dynasty, it was also a pottery.

Family members. He is full of strategic knowledge, but what's the use of being born in the era of Shengping? Only by writing a book

Said, wrote a long and short sutra handed down from generation to generation, and went to a monastery to be a hermit. Although he was recruited by the court, he refused to go out.

So in history, he was called Zhao Zhengjun. Although he passed on an apprentice, Li Bai, the poet Li Taibai, he used it in his later years.

It didn't work well at that time, and as a result, I was beheaded several times. Fortunately, he helped Guo Zi in trouble when he was young.

Instrument, so later Guo Ziyi for insurance, for death. If it was later, after the Anshi Rebellion and Shi Siming.

Chaos, perhaps Li Bai can keep pace with Li Bi, a famous figure who set things right in the middle Tang Dynasty, and each has his own strengths, which is not the case in history.

It belongs only to poets and scribes, and it can also be a brilliant achievement of famous officials!

He himself is a good example:

Yesterday, King Wen saw that his son was ninety years old. King Wen said: Hey! Old! Xunzi said: if the envoy pursues the tiger and the deer,

I am getting old. I was young when I was in charge of state affairs.

In fact, Wen Wang's "old age" is a deliberate joke, and he also has some feelings for himself.

Tao. When King Wen used Jiang Taigong, Lu Shang was over eighty years old. He is as old as King Wu. while

However, people over 90 years old, who know the great cause of rejuvenating the country, are beyond their age, just like Zhao Yi in the Qing Dynasty.

Poetry: "There are strange things under the cloud account, and there are many tears in front of the drum horn lamp." So, I played a joke on Xunzi-"Hey!

Old. "Scorpion old? Or does he feel old? Only he knows. But Xunzi's answer,

It is also in line with Wen Wang's mind, and the two are intimate and hit it off. One is to be thirsty for talents, and the other is to sell well.

In this way, everyone gets what he needs and gets what he wants. Isn't this the evidence of Shang Xian? Besides, Legalists like Han Fei, although he is the master.

Zhang Fazhi does not emphasize the rule of man, but the users are people, not the law. If people don't use the law, the law is waste. Han Fei recommended himself, Zheng.

I think I am a talented person, so I want to sell it to the emperor. If the owner is not "Shang Xian", where can Han Fei sell it?

What about his own talent?

Let's take a look at Huainanzi who worshiped Taoism in the pre-Han period. He put forward the idea of the same strain as the Legalists.

Objections, such as saying "poor peck"; If you are poor, you touch; Poverty is cheating. " . Rape cannot be prohibited by harsh laws. "

The opposite truth put forward by Huai Nan Zi here, as Lao Zi said, "The ratio of length to height is oblique." have

There are both positive and negative aspects. Huainanzi is a Taoist priest. He used Taoist thought to oppose legalism. Legalism is originally out of Tao.

Home, this is a very interesting question.

Huai Nan Zi said, "Birds peck when they are poor, animals touch when they are poor, and people cheat when they are poor." When birds are hungry and can't catch insects,

When you see wood, you peck at everything. The beast is really hungry. In order to get food, it doesn't matter whether you are human or anything else.

Dare to touch anything. "People who are poor cheat." When people are poor, they try their best to survive and cheat.

Cheating. For example, the legalist Han Feizi said: "The state-owned law remains unchanged, although it is dangerous." Huai Nanzi said not necessarily: "Severe punishment and severe law.

No matter how strict the law is, rape cannot be prohibited. "Although the law is very strict and it is easy to be sentenced to death, all creatures are in the sea, all the same.

Crime and murder. This is the truth that "a man with little ambition and a horse with thin hair", and there is nothing he can do. That's mean.

When it's extremely bad, it will run amok. Therefore, denying the function of the rule of law depends on moral influence.

Enough to make the world truly peaceful.

In any case, each idea has its own expertise. Especially in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, a hundred schools of thought contend.

There are countless books and opinions. There are so many books that I really want to push them away. arrive

In the past, we thought we were a little smart, and the reasons for thinking were quite unique. But I happened to read an old book.

My face turned red. Because I thought of the truth, the ancients said, thousands of years ago, I just now.

It's not expensive to think of. In short, there are many positive and negative materials like those discussed above in the book.

Let's go back to what Laozi said: "Without Shang Xian, the people will not dispute". What kind of sage do you mean by sage here?

To what extent are sages really publicized? It is difficult to have standards. No matter what Confucius and Mencius said or what Zhuangzi said,

What standards should the sages referred to by various factions meet? It's hard to be sure. Therefore, the Taoist Bao Puzi said:

"White stone is like jade, and traitors are like sages." A good white stone, crystal clear, looks like a white jade.

But as far as its texture is concerned, neither hardness nor density can reach the standard of real jade. According to the world gem standard,

To evaluate, it can only be called "stone" at best. For example, "Qingtian Stone" and "Opal Stone" are actually just

Just a good stone. As for people, the same is true. Sometimes the worst people seem.

A great saint. Therefore, it is difficult to distinguish between virtuous and unhelpful. We use these viewpoints to explain Laozi's "No Shang Xian,

I believe it will be more helpful for us to study the connotation of this sentence of Laozi.

Praise methods of modern good people and old people

There is no doubt that Laozi's books have been rearranged, but on the whole, they are well arranged.

The meaning and nature of each sentence are classified separately. If you express your opinion that there is something wrong with the original arrangement, then you can do it yourself.

It is difficult to draw a conclusion from the opinions of one family.

When I introduced the first chapter, I first pointed out that Laozi often confused the body and behavior of Tao.

Discuss it. Moreover, from the functional point of view, the so-called "Tao" of Laozi and Zhuangzi is the way of being born and practicing Buddhism and joining the WTO.

Interdoping, improper application, inexhaustible, and even wonderful. So reading Zhuangzi is like reading Sun Tzu's The Art of War.

Similarly, the so-called "skillful operation, care about one heart." So, if you want to fully express the connotation of Laozi,

Come on, it's troublesome. Especially in the application for WTO entry, many historical philosophies are often involved. Using historical facts,

Choose them and seek a discussion close to metaphysical truth through the surface layer outside the facts. This is in an ordinary university.

It should be a professional course. But in many places, it is difficult to speak freely when it comes to historical facts.

Yes For example, the phrase "Without Shang Xian, there is no dispute between the people and Shang Xian" is hard to determine.

In other words, in a truly peaceful era, there is no need to flaunt good people. We only list the modern.

One or two stories will probably add a little interest to "Without Shang Xian, let the people contend".

A few years ago, the Taiwan Province Provincial Society launched a "respect for the elderly" activity to praise the elderly. first time

When it was held, I found that it was simply a way to play with the elderly and die early for them. Said it was that old

Some old people sit there and listen to training, get prizes and take them everywhere. In fact, it is also hard for the elderly.

Burden, I think those old people may be exhausted, more likely because many people don't want it after this trend is opened.

I don't want to enter the ranks of being "respected for the elderly", so it becomes a struggle. Didn't you see Lao Tzu say, "Don't look at what you want, make it."

The heart is not chaotic "? For example, there is nothing wrong with our motivation to flaunt good people and let them be rewarded, but

After the atmosphere was formed, some people in the society tried their best to win praise. Then, the original intention of praising good people will deteriorate.

Yes I also receive official documents recommending good deeds every year, but in my opinion, there are too many good deeds. Who should I recommend?

When asking for help, everyone just smiles at me, shakes his head and waves, and no one will accept the recommendation. I often laugh.

There are two good people I want to recommend, but unfortunately one is dead and the other is not incarnate. I guess I still can't bear it.

I like half a good person, but I hate being recommended by others. Like everyone else, I am more afraid of recommending myself. still

Ignore it and let Xian go (with a smile). From these two stories, we can probably know the so-called "not yet"

Sage, make the people do not dispute ",in Lao Tzu's society at that time, in that historical and political form," Shang Xian "was already.

A fault, so he put forward this sentence.

Cut short the nonsense and return to one's muttons. In fact, the ups and downs in human history can be divided into two categories: being a man and doing things.

From a standpoint, it is difficult to make a definite statement from a purely philosophical point of view.

Cut to the conclusion From the perspective of personnel management alone, Tu, a famous minister in the early Qing Dynasty, played the role of "three habits and one disadvantage".

It's quite thorough! Among them, such as:

It is more than three generations for a husband to be a gentleman and a villain to be retired! Although the third quarter of the world (the last generation of decline and chaos

When you are in power, you are willing to rule. Who doesn't want to use gentlemen? And the wise king (confident leader),

Every saint has his minister (everyone thinks that all the cadres he chooses are saints). Who thinks we don't have to?

Must be a gentleman, not a villain. He who dies in a mean person and retreats to be a gentleman has no choice but to use talent instead of virtue.

Yes

Virtue is the only place for a gentleman. Talent is shared by villains and gentlemen, and it won. The language is right, jun.

If a stupid little man is jealous, he will follow his ear. Running around, a gentleman is clumsy, a villain is a monarch, and then use his eyes.

Learn to vote. That is, taking the exam (taking the exam) and being lazy (taking the exam), a gentleman is ashamed to do his own thing.

Verbally, the villains are clever and diligent, but they also do their best.

Little people help their strengths to make good investments, while people are addicted to what they have learned without feeling anything. Listen carefully, listen to what you say, truth.

It looks pleasing to the eye, but it will be exciting to try it. So the villains happen to coincide, and the gentleman.

Never leave. As for the husband, if the villain unites and the gentleman divides, how can his suffering speak louder than words!