About the debate!

Does the mobile phone bring people closer or alienate them?

Frontal-mobile phones bring people closer.

On the contrary-mobile phones alienate people.

Wonderful argument:

Thank you, Chairman! Hello, judges!

Today, our view is that "mobile phones have brought people closer". "Distance" refers to the distance between time and space, as well as the distance between the mind. As we all know, people are people in society, and if people want to survive in society, they must communicate and contact. With the development of science and technology and communication, human beings have changed from a relatively isolated state to an interconnected and inseparable whole. The emergence of mobile phones has added a communication channel for people to pull in. First, mobile phones are convenient, fast and efficient, which makes people communicate easily. Since ancient times, Hong Fei has been a bridge between people, and the information transmission is very slow and inconvenient, which leads to the lag of information exchange. In today's information age, people are involved in fierce competition and pressure. They have no time to visit relatives and friends all day, and they have no time and energy to convey greetings and blessings to relatives and friends through letters, let alone face-to-face conversations, which will inevitably alienate people. As the old saying goes, "You will be happy if you pay, but you will not be happy if you don't pay." The mobile phone comes into our life like an elf, and these troubles have been overcome. We can get in touch with our relatives and friends with a flick of our fingers. It can be described as a thousand-mile marriage! Second, the emergence of mobile phones has provided a broader communication space for human beings, deepened people's communication and made things easier. We don't rule out the role of other communication methods, nor do we think it's either one or the other. They are all members of the three-dimensional diversified communication network in modern society, and they are win-win and complementary. The mobile phone is the most common one and plays a very important role. With it, the relationship between people has undergone fundamental changes. No wonder some people say, "The earth has become smaller and a global village." So we think that "mobile phones have brought people closer". thank you

Thank you, Chairman! Thank you for your wonderful debate!

We admit that perhaps from a certain perspective, mobile phones may indeed have a certain degree of negative impact on the relationship between people, but we should analyze the leading role with a dialectical eye. There is no doubt that the benefits brought by mobile phones have prevailed, that is, mobile phones have brought people closer. Its birth and development brought great benefits to our life, study and work, including the convenience of communication and the "compression" of time and space. With it, you don't have to worry about friends and relatives thousands of miles away all day, even on the other side of the globe, you can get in touch with them in an instant. A doctor once said: "People should pay attention to a word' faith' in communication, which should be established through time and various body languages." "Go home often and help parents wash dishes and beat their backs" is of course the expectation of every parent and child, but the reality often backfires. Mobile phones have become a platform for us to communicate with each other, and people can greet and care for each other anytime and anywhere. In this way, the "letter" has not been reduced, but has been strengthened. Aren't these distances?

-A positive argument: Wu Jinyuan.

Thank you, Chairman!

Thank you for your wonderful debate! But is the fact really as the other party said? Will mobile phones crowd out other ways of communication and reduce face-to-face communication? The answer is obviously no! People in different places, even if they don't use mobile phones, will communicate with other media, such as letters. It is the distance between time and space that prevents them from meeting, not the mobile phone! On the contrary, the mobile phone has pulled into the spiritual distance, which really contributed! Another classmate said that after buying a mobile phone, he only made phone calls and sent text messages, instead of meeting his friends. What does this mean? Explain that people are lazy! If it weren't for my mobile phone, I couldn't contact my friends by phone! Now I have something to call and exchange ideas. Can he not thank the mobile phone for helping your relationship with your friends? We believe that mobile phone communication and face-to-face communication are not absolute contradictions, but a win-win relationship and a complementary relationship. Especially in the modern society with fast pace of life and high mobility of people, it is impossible and unnecessary to interview everything, and mobile phones provide convenience for communication with their convenient, fast and efficient characteristics, which will inevitably pull people away. We say that the distance of interpersonal relationship depends on his blood relationship and the relationship between people. The blood relationship between father and son is certain. But like our friends, how can we get closer without contact? Another debater also said that mobile phones can cause trust problems. Is there really no false element in face-to-face communication? To increase trust, isn't it necessary to provide such opportunities first? Mobile phones provide such a space and opportunity for communication, which brings us closer. The foundation of trust is to have contacts! If you don't communicate for a while, you will immediately trust and confide, which is in conflict with the experience of ordinary people. To trust and make deep friends, we must first have such an opportunity, but today we completely ignore this opportunity to talk about communication. What's the point?

Mobile phones can't convey feelings and body language. Is the opponent trying to tell us that we can't communicate our feelings without expressions and body language? People are higher animals, because we use language! As far as I know, animals use a lot of body language, but can they convey feelings compared with people? thank you

-Two positive statements: Guo Lei

Hello, ladies and gentlemen!

Here I reiterate our view that "mobile phones have brought people closer together". Next, I will elaborate on the distance and mobile phone. First of all, I deeply regret that the other debater misunderstood our "distance". We believe that distance can refer to the distance in time and space, and it can also refer to people's emotional distance. When the distance is understood in the first way, the mobile phone has narrowed the distance between people, which I think is obvious to all and indisputable. As the crystallization of the development of human science and technology and the necessity of modern information society, mobile phones have greatly shortened the time for people to communicate and contact, and ended the past era of "the geese pass the book, the fish pass the foot" and the information lag. This is the convenience and quickness of the mobile phone, the function of transmitting information in the first time, which shortens the distance between people in time. Now people often say a word-"global village", the earth has become smaller, although it can not be said that it is only the credit of mobile phones, but mobile phones have indeed played an undeniable and very important role in it.

In addition, mobile phones have also brought people closer together. When analyzing this problem, let's start with communication. As we all know, knowing a friend does not mean that this person will definitely become your good friend or even confidant. The process from a friend to a good friend or even a bosom friend requires constant contact, communication and exchange. On the basis of understanding, only communication can sublimate the relationship between people and narrow the emotional distance. The main function of mobile phone is to facilitate people to contact and promote communication, so it is not difficult for us to draw a conclusion that mobile phone can narrow the emotional distance between people. Speaking of this, another debater may have to repeat the example of people cheating with mobile phones, but we can't help asking here, didn't this phenomenon exist before the emergence of mobile phones? This shows that the key to the problem is not the mobile phone, but the people themselves. Moreover, we should also see that cheating with mobile phones is only an individual case, and using mobile phones to contact feelings and narrow the emotional distance between people is the mainstream phenomenon.

The second key issue I want to elaborate is the mobile phone. Another debater said that mobile phones crowded out other means of communication, making people's communication easier, but I have to state a fact. During the period of Spring Festival travel rush, the passenger flow increased year by year, but during the period of Spring Festival travel rush, the number of SMS and telephone calls also increased year by year. It can be seen that the use of mobile phones does not prevent people from communicating in other ways, such as face to face, letters, etc., but it is only a supplement to the existing communication methods rather than a substitute. What we should see more is that people can't always be with their family and friends. Under this objective condition, mobile phones provide us with a more convenient and quick way of communication, which is conducive to people's contact and brings people closer.

At this point, I can't help but think of a love tragedy caused by the lack of information exchange between Lu You and Tang Wan, a poet in the Song Dynasty. Please allow me to end my speech with one word:

"Chai Feng, it's a tragedy. In the past, the fate of a good couple was difficult to continue. A cup of sorrow, a few years of cable. No, no, no.

Up to now, there are mobile phones, unlimited text messaging, mobile phone contact, close, close, close, close! "

Thank you!

-Four positive arguments: Zhou Wei.

Thank you, Chairman. Hello:

Alienation refers to relationship, emotional distance, not closeness. The distance between people is also the emotional distance, which is the expression of whether the relationship between people is intimate or not.

In ancient times, communication was very simple, and the meaning could be conveyed to each other only through body language and a few hesitations.

With the development of human society and the continuous progress of science and technology, people use and communicate more and more widely. Internet, videophone, mobile phone, fax and so on have become very common. Some people think that these tools, especially mobile phones, speed up people's communication and bring people closer. But our view is that mobile phones alienate people. The reason for this is the following：

First, there are many ways to communicate with people, including language dialogue, body movements, eye contact and so on. However, mobile phones only limit communication to written and simple language conversations, which is incomplete. In the long run, this unstable mood is bound to be as fragile as the barrel in the barrel effect.

Second, mobile phones can also cause some unnecessary misunderstandings and misunderstandings, leading to the alienation of relationships between people. For example, mass texting, you receive several identical messages a day. I'm sure you won't have a good impression on this message, even on the person who sent it. On the contrary, it has caused the gap between people and alienated people.

Thirdly, with the development of science and technology, mobile phones have more and more functions, from surfing the Internet and taking photos to visual and 3D games, which makes them more office and entertaining, thus reducing the number of times they are used for communication.

To sum up, we have reason to believe that mobile phones can only alienate people now and in the future.

Summary statement:

I believe that students who have seen the movie "Mobile Phone" will be familiar with the lens of Zhang Guoli and Ge You lying with their mobile phones. They use mobile phones as a convenient tool to round up their shameful lies at will. Can this kind of emotional deception narrow the distance between people? When one day you suddenly discover the hypocrisy of this unreal emotion, can you still say that mobile phones have brought people closer?

Mobile phones are really fast, and people you want can be found everywhere, but what if you don't want to be found or need to think independently? People's communication can be divided into dynamic and static. The convenience of mobile phones has brought people trouble. Can it be said that it has narrowed the distance between people?

The distance between people is also an emotional distance, which is not necessarily related to the distance between time and space. The high efficiency of mobile phones leads to the disadvantages of this way of communication. Because of its own characteristics, people are alienated.

-The opposing argument: Chen Hui.

Thank you, Chairman. Hello:

Thank you for your wonderful speech, but it doesn't change the fact that mobile phones alienate people.

First of all, it is precisely because mobile phones provide us with convenient and quick contact methods that people give up more opportunities for face-to-face communication! So that people only pay attention to the timeliness of mutual contact rather than its intimacy. As we all know, the communication between people should be multifaceted. If two people only use mobile phones to communicate every day and never meet each other, even if they send hundreds of text messages and talk on the phone for hours every day, will the other person be an expert in quarreling? Are they close friends?

People often rely on mobile phones to occupy most of the space in their lives, and even ignore the people and things around them. If the other debater says that the mobile phone only brings us closer because it is fast and efficient, then I would like to ask: does the friend of the other debater only consider efficiency? Is the opponent's life goal to make friends with his mobile phone every day?

I don't think the other debater will choose to have a vigorous love affair with the mobile phone, right? Imagine, butterfly lovers just whispered with his mobile phone, will we still be moved and shocked? At most, two young people lost their way in the power grid and lost their foothold. Because of the negligence of the other debater, great love has become the laughing stock of people! Then we can only say: Liang Che is angry and the consequences are very serious!

Secondly, the other debater ignored the frequent fraud in today's society, and the mobile phone is playing a huge role. It is precisely because the mobile phone has alienated the distance between people that all kinds of lies are rampant for a time, further alienating the distance between people! Everyone should still be impressed by the movie "Mobile Phone". If the answer comes from your mobile phone: "Hmm ... Yes ... Ah ..." Do other debaters still think that the mobile phone is bringing them closer?

When the Pakistani government captured the terrorist leader Libby, he didn't find any weapons around him, only a mobile phone. Did another debater delude himself into thinking that the terrorist attack that everyone denounced was an attempt by terrorists to close the distance with us? Then the Bush administration's response to 9. 1 1 should be a delicious cake instead of the war in Iraq!

In view of time, the above are only some of our views, and there are countless facts that mobile phones alienate people. So, please don't be stubborn! The sea of suffering is boundless, and the fact that mobile phones will alienate people cannot be changed!

-Two arguments against it: Ru Jing

Thank you, Chairman. Hello!

Thanks to other debaters and our debaters for further making everyone realize that the mobile phone, covered with a beautiful veil that pulls people away, actually acts as a alienated sinner, so we should be vigilant and not let the small mobile phone make the familiar people become strangers. Today, we have repeatedly stressed that people are emotional, and the distance between people cannot be specifically quantified or calculated, only by the feelings of the soul. The words written by a writer touched the readers and narrowed the distance between the writer and the readers. It is a kind of soul. So the distance between people is not the distance between Beijing and Shanghai, nor the distance between today and yesterday. Otherwise, "I look at the clouds in the sky and look at you around me." When I look at the clouds, it is very close; When I look at you, it is far away from me. " Such a beautiful poem; There is no classic saying that "the furthest distance in the world is when I stand beside you and you don't know that I love you"; Of course, the ancients would not say, "Walking and convergence are thousands of miles apart; It doesn't work, it doesn't work. " As another debater mentioned, the efficiency, quickness and convenience of mobile phones are the important reasons why modern people generally use mobile phones. But can efficiency, speed and convenience bring people closer? When we knock on the door of our own heart, we will find some words such as "Love comes with time" and "Look at people's hearts with time", which shows that people's emotions need to stand the test of time rather than pursue efficiency. It is obviously ridiculous for a naive opponent to try to complete rapid emotional communication by using a mobile phone. Have other debaters heard these truths: the thousands of words you gave me are actually far less than a gentle look when you and I are opposite; The thousands of hilarious jokes you sent me can't compare with the faint smile when you and I passed by. The thousands of blessings you sent me will never catch up with your sincere sigh in front of me. All these make me feel sad, because the emotional communication that people yearn for is in jeopardy because of the widespread use of mobile phones. When you receive several identical blessings at the same time, will you still be grateful to the person who sent them to you? When you know that many people have received the same blessings as you, will you still be moved by your friends' true feelings? Can you laugh when you receive several identical jokes at the same time? These seemingly affectionate things hurt us mercilessly. We become numb and indifferent. Wearing a mobile phone as our disguise is actually alienating us. Sadly, the other debater is still in the dark, which really makes people sad, heartbroken and sad! Another debater also said that mobile phones let people who are thousands of miles away talk about their worries, but we should be soberly aware that people's emotional needs have brought people closer, not mobile phones. If I have the desire to communicate with him, I will try to contact him. Or I'll turn it off if I have a mobile phone. I chose not to answer the phone, and I chose not to return the text messages. This seems to mean that everything has nothing to do with mobile phones, but it is not. Why are modern people happy to communicate with distant people and even strangers? The convenience of mobile phone is a mistake, because a lot of time is spent in contact with people far away, and the communication with people around us is getting less and less every day. No wonder people's communication skills are declining, and even they can't laugh, which leads to increasing mental health problems! Another debater, when you attend a party, everyone is calling or texting on their mobile phones, and you will deeply feel that mobile phones are really alienating people. In class, for whatever reason, your mobile phone rang, which aroused the disgust of classmates and teachers. Whether you like it or not, mobile phones alienate you from others, because nothing can be called alienation like spiritual resentment. I wonder if the opponent's debater feels the trouble, misunderstanding and embarrassment caused by the simple number 1 1? Have you talked to the other party for several rounds before you know that you mistook one for another or that the other party made a mistake? Have you ever tried to end the conversation with each other as soon as possible? Do you ever feel uneasy when you have to lie because you don't want to communicate with each other? I think everyone who uses a mobile phone can't escape this fate. This kind of communication will make people depressed for a long time, which is a vicious circle, and the mobile phone is the initiator! I have long learned the philosophical view of seeing the essence through phenomena. Today, I sincerely hope that the other debater can see the essence of alienating people from the phenomenon that mobile phones bring people closer!

-Four arguments against the party: Yang