Is it realistic to let children take their wives' names?

It is a very complicated problem to share the same surname with whom. It is tantamount to challenging thousands of years of traditional culture, challenging men's traditions and ancestors, despising ancestors, denying ancestors, being lawless, denying patriarchal culture, and deviant. Is to challenge the position of men in the family. It is absolutely forbidden by rural people.

Whose surname a child takes reflects a person's position at home, ability to make money and strength.

Historically, children have taken their fathers' surnames, because men are the protagonists and masters, occupying an absolute dominant position at home, in society, in companies and in the world. Women have no right to speak. Women are just tools for men to have children.

No matter what the child's surname is, a woman has no right to decide and say. Just like a small country can't join the P5. Many countries want to join the P5, such as India, Japan, Germany and Brazil. After joining the five permanent members of the United Nations, you have the right to decide major issues in the world. Your words carry weight, and no country dares to bully you.

However, it is only a dream for India, Japan and other countries to join the P5. Women want to control the family and men, and want their children to take their names. Maybe they are just telling jokes.

Many women divorced and didn't let their children change their surnames. In order to fight for alimony, I dare not change my child's surname. Moreover, even the man doesn't pay alimony, and the woman doesn't let the children take their surnames.

Is it realistic to let children take their mother's surname?

The seed is real, and nothing can change the fact.

It doesn't really matter whether a child takes his husband's surname or his wife's surname, just like red and blue. Our ancestors were called red, blue, blue and red at first, and today our descendants recognize them. The wife asks the children to take her surname, and the man can patiently explain that taking the father's surname is a habit for thousands of years. If you (wife) take her father's surname, her father will take her grandfather's surname. This has also been a custom for thousands of years. But if your wife's value, status, economic income, work or ability are better than yours. Marriage is risky at any time. What kind of husband knows about heroes? It doesn't matter what clothes or hats you wear. What matters is blood and affection.

Now that the family planning policy has been relaxed, you can have a second child. After having children, you can have a second child, one with the father's surname and the other with the mother's surname, and parents will not have any opinions. It is your right for children to take their father's surname and their mother's surname, and no one will interfere.

Normal women don't ask for this. Why do you say that all people in China know how to marry a daughter-in-law and a girl? Why don't you know? Also ask such a question

If the child is your own, you can have a second child, one with your surname and the other with your wife's surname.

The Marriage Law clearly stipulates that children born by both husband and wife can take their father's surname or their mother's surname. It's not a question of whether you agree or disagree.

There is no problem in theory,

There will be some obstacles in local customs.

It's even harder in real life.

Personally, I think the problem is not big, but the child is not.