800 words of college entrance examination composition: talking about "behind the score"

75 points, not bad.

85 points, excellent.

100, perfect.

These figures have been understood since our primary school didn't fully understand arithmetic.

When I first read this cartoon, my reaction was: two children, like me when I was a child, would be worried about their exam results, worried about disappointing their parents, afraid of being laughed at for failing, and ashamed of getting full marks in the last exam, but this time they almost didn't get full marks. ...

These seem to be normal manifestations and reactions. The "primary school bully" in the cartoon should be rewarded with a score of 100 and scolded by his parents with a score of 98. On the contrary, a "schoolmate" who fails 55 points can only be scolded and grieved, while a score of 6 1 is appreciation and encouragement. Everyone will inevitably think that this is the normal state of family education, school education and social education under our exam-oriented education, even though we clamor for "encouraging more children", "clear rewards" and "different children can be treated with different standards", and even rise to Confucius' "teaching students in accordance with their aptitude" and so on.

If we just stay on the surface of cartoons, grades, family education standards, etc., I think "primary school bully" and "small backwardness" are only innuendos to more "victims" in the future, even if we pass the college entrance examination. The similarity of their behavior is not the standard judgment itself, but the original intention of judging by others' standards.

When this language comes out, it is not crazy.

First of all, it is not only the score that is judged, but also the valuable recognition. In mathematics learning, there is a function concept called "domain". Because of the complexity of functions, when they are in different domains, the same function formula and variable operation get different results, sometimes even no solution. This is very similar to the superficial meaning of our cartoon. Divided into different domains, two children will get different external feedback.

But I want to emphasize that a child thinks that his value needs to be judged by the domain defined by others from an early age. Isn't this a terrible thing? Children's academic performance, learning ability, learning interest, etc. Are judged by the answer sheets in other people's hands. If there is no examination paper in life, where is his life value? Where is his territory?

Then, not only study, but also attitude towards life. To put it simply, our study needs an authoritative judgment, which is really understandable. But in fact, the original intention of the two children's behavior is not a question of reward and punishment, crime and punishment, but his vision, attitude and recognition of "begging" from the outside world. When you say this is commendable, he will be happy; If you can't say it well, he will be depressed. It can be seen that the answers and scores he has mastered are not only "wonderful" or "bad" evaluations, but also his judgment on his future study and even his attitude towards life.

Finally, there is an essential problem, that is, what is found is not the difference, but the equality of distance. Psychologists have done a test and come to the conclusion that students' learning level and ability are reflected at fixed intervals in the same test, with a fluctuation gap of 30 points. In other words, a student with strong learning ability will not be 30 points worse than his average level; On the other hand, students with weak ability will not be higher than the usual average score of 30 points; Only when we jump out of this range can we call it "abnormal" or "extraordinary". It can be seen that for "primary school tyrants" and "small backwardness", the simple gap is more a subjective emotional judgment given by people's long-term standards, and it does not make them understand that they have been in "distance fairness" and there is no so-called "small retrogression" and "big progress". Everything is still developing normally. ...

As a person who has experienced the college entrance examination and counts every minute as gold, I deeply understand that the determination of scores can define and limit us a lot. But thanks to this cartoon for giving me an opportunity to ramble and warn our children about self-worth, learning effectiveness and attitude towards life. You can also be a ruler or define your own domain.

Behind the scores are not grades, otherwise Arabs will not be reviled by students? Fraction is a symbol, and man himself is also a symbol. We can give our symbol rich value and connotation.