Do people laugh when they speak ill of themselves?

This phenomenon does exist in the United States, boasting. But this kind of boastful behavior should also be treated rationally. People who praise themselves have different purposes. Most of them are so-called knowledge and experts who express emotions; Most of them are politicians, even the president and the army. No matter what kind of people they are, their purposes are multiple, some are deliberately playing sad, some are slandering the policies of the US government, some are venting their emotions, and some are reminding them. In fact, the U.S. government has a wide range of intelligence agencies, and there are many analysis and speculation institutions. These people don't need to remind us. Moreover, all American presidents do not like the theory of American decline when they are in power. US President Barack Obama once angered those who sang bad words about the United States: "Those who think that the United States is declining have no idea what they are talking about."

Why does the United States have words to sing down itself? Many networks, including experts and scholars, regard these comments of the United States as bad words, which are similar to reminding the government and even hiding people's eyes and ears. I don't think so. Why? Quite simply, the United States pursues a hegemonic strategy. The essence of hegemonic strategy is to maintain it by tough means, including war. If you want to pursue hegemony, you can't escape, so you must adopt an offensive strategy, and you can't escape. Since the end of World War II, the United States has become a superpower. The important means to ensure the rise of the United States is to openly seize and fight, and never hide American power. Although the United States is strong, it is not everything. There must be disadvantages, such as the economic crisis in 2008, the Vietnam War, the military failure of the United States in recent years and so on. Whenever something similar happens, or the United States doesn't play well, there will be Americans swearing at each other. This kind of speech is defined as reflection and review, summing up experience, which is not rigorous, because these people who criticize themselves are not politicians or relevant government decision-making think tanks in the United States, and the US government will not attach importance to these, and will have a negative impact on the presidents.

There are many kinds of comments criticizing the United States. For example, if a country no longer uses the US dollar, or if a country's currency is designated as the currency in circulation by a country, someone will immediately write an article saying that the US dollar has collapsed, exaggerating the crisis faced by the US dollar hegemony; Another example: a country's economy is developing rapidly, and so-called experts will soon write an article pointing out that the economic status of the United States is facing challenges; As soon as a country develops hypersonic weapons, it is called learning to write an article that challenges American military hegemony. The United States not only made a wide range of comments on itself, but also sang to death, which simply means that the United States is almost finished and crying. Did these voices really play a role in preparing for danger in times of peace for the strength, economic development and hegemonic strategy of the United States? Not necessarily, if it really works, it would be a mistake, because the hegemonic strategy of the United States is a sustained strategy and will not be affected by the theory of singing decline. Therefore, I don't approve of the use of the United States by poor singing skills. Besides, is the United States just blowing its own horn? No, it's also bad-mouthing others, and not a little.