Guan Yu went to the meeting alone. The fact is that there was an argument that did not win or lose.

Sun Quan expressed dissatisfaction with the result of the one-knife meeting. After Lu Su's death, Sun Quan commented on the meeting: I can't do it in it, but I can't say it. This matter can't be solved. He's just talking big. Although it is just a big talk, Lu Su in history is much more powerful than Lu Su in the romance. At least he can "talk big" and spray a few words, not as wretched and timid as in romance novels. Otherwise, Zhou Yu would not recommend Lu Su.

Single Knife Club is the most brilliant chapter in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and it is also the most wonderful play in the Three Kingdoms. Lu Su wanted to recapture Jingzhou and invited Guan Yu, who was guarding Jingzhou, to dinner. He wanted to take it down and threatened to return it to Jingzhou. Unexpectedly, Guan Yunchang prepared in advance. He was not caught by Lu Su, but by Lu Su. Then take Lu Su hostage, take him to the river and escape safely.

As soon as this was said, Guan Yu scolded him, and Lu Su told him the ending. However, romance belongs to romance, history belongs to history, but opening historical records is the opposite.

In 2008, the biography of Lu Su mentioned this single-handed incident. This encounter between Guan and Lu, like the theme of Romance of the Three Kingdoms, is all about the ownership of Jingzhou. However, there is no mention in the history books that Lu Su set up a bureau to detain Guan Yu. The two sides are purely negotiations. Lu Su did not cheat, and Guan Yu did not have to worry too much about his safety. It is called a single knife meeting because all the participants are holding single knives. It is estimated that Lu Su also has a knife in his hand.

According to the Records of the Three Kingdoms, Lu Su made a complaint at the meeting, accusing the other party of saying, "We Wu Dong lent you Jingzhou because we pitied you for beating Liu Xuande and there was no place to stand. Now that I have given up, I still refuse to return Jingzhou. Now we only ask for the return of the three counties, and you still refuse. " The implication is a little too much.

According to historical records, Guan Yu didn't answer back, let alone seriously criticize Lu Su at length. One of Guan Yu's generals stood up and said, "Where there is virtue on the land, there is virtue, but not necessarily." Lu Su was furious on the spot and strongly reprimanded Jingzhou soldiers. His expression and tone are very strict. "Lu Su snapped that his words were very sharp." This department has no specific name, but it was written as Zhou Cang in Romance. In fact, Zhou Cang is also a fictional character, which first appeared in the Song Dynasty.

In the face of Lu Su's arrogance, Guan Yu never responded strongly. He just scolded his men, "This is a matter of state. What do you know? " Then, he motioned with his eyes and told him to go away. In the romance, Guan Yu told Zhou Cang to go away and prepare the boat.

This version should come from the historical materials of Wu at that time, namely "The History of the Three Kingdoms". In Wu's material, it was Lu Su who took the initiative to go to Guan Yu's site for peace talks, but it was a bit risky to break into the enemy camp. During the negotiation, Guan Yu put forward an argument to the effect that our left general also made great contributions in the battle of Wulin in Chibi and went into battle in person. He didn't even take off his armor when he slept and didn't get up. With this credit, it is right to take Jingzhou.

Lu Su was not timid at all, and immediately fought back: when Liu Yuzhou was defeated by Changbanpo, there was not even a single soldier in the serenade, let alone a decent piece of land, and he planned to escape to a farther place. At that time, he didn't know there was such a big place as Jingzhou. Our host has pity on you. We are not stingy with our land and people, so we lend you our land. You Liu Yuzhou are full of selfishness and hypocrisy. Now that you have Yizhou, you still depend on Jingzhou. This kind of treachery can't even be done by ordinary people, let alone an upper-class person like Liu Yuzhou. If you don't bully Jingzhou, you will suffer morally and sooner or later.

How did Guan Yu react to Lu Su's eloquent reprimand? Historical records say: no answer, no answer.

This is the original information of the Single Knife Club. Lu Suniu broke up and took the initiative to come to the door to negotiate, and the other party was speechless. But this was recorded by Dan Wu. How credible is it?

Wu seems to have obvious feelings for historical materials. Wu and Shu have no room for discussion on the ownership of Jingzhou. For Guan Yu, who is guarding Jingzhou, Wu certainly has emotions. Under the influence of this emotion, memory records may be biased. Lu Su's good words were recorded and even beautified, while Guan Yu's refutation was selectively blocked. Add what should be added and delete what should not be deleted. It is not impossible to highlight our heroes and shape each other into bear bags.

Wu Dong likes to hack others and has a criminal record. For example, Wu Shu and Black Cao Shu are their representative works. Many of Cao Cao's misdeeds, such as killing Lv Boshe and saying that he would rather overthrow the world, all come from this book. Whether it is true or not, there are no witnesses to the death. The only advantage is that it adds wonderful material to the explosion of novels and songs.

Therefore, it can be speculated that Guan Yu may not be refuted by Lu Su at the single-knife meeting, but he was too lazy to spit with Lu Su out of arrogance and disdain. Anyway, I occupied this place. What can you do? Talk too much. Can you get the website back?

However, on the other hand, although Wu Dong may have promoted Lu Su and fabricated some heroic deeds, one thing is certain: as the other side, Guan Yu did not gain the upper hand verbally, and there was no such thing as Lu Su being scolded by Guan Yu as a grandson or even being held hostage. Neither side won.

In the Yuan Dynasty, Guan Hanqing wrote a play called Tibetan, which was very popular at the box office. At that time, during the Mongolian high-pressure period, the Han people were oppressed and could not lift their heads. Guan Hanqing injected full national enthusiasm into Guan Yu, who happened to be a celebrity and hero of Shu Han. That year, he followed Liu Huangshu to revive the Han Dynasty. Therefore, through this image, the national complex of the Han people is happily expressed. The meeting was tampered with and teased again. Guan Yu was pushed to the upper hand and Lu Su was pushed to the lower hand. Guan Hanqing denounced Wu Dong in Guan Yu's words. In fact, everyone knows who he cursed.

Excellent historical figures will never die, they will be reshaped into models that meet the wishes of contemporary people. Guan Yu was such a man and became the spokesman for the rejuvenation of the Han nationality. In Guan Hanqing's works, jokes are about history, but no jokes are about national feelings.

In addition, Guan Hanqing's surname is Guan, and it is also good to take care of his historical surname when writing. Of course, this is a personal guess and there is no evidence to support it.

Historical events and historical figures have not actually disappeared with the passage of history in people's minds. Their mission was not completed at one time, but has been developing and growing. With different needs, it will be reconstructed and shaped, and the farther it goes, the more it will never return to its true colors. Some jokes do not conform to the laws of history, but conform to the laws of national psychology.

A knife meeting, such a real historical event, just like the same river, jumped out of the riverbed of historical facts and formed another river after the emotional explosion of Han nationality in Yuan Dynasty. It can be said that the solo ride of Guan Wang's Single Knife Club and the Three Kingdoms is already in the two river basins.

Guan Yu didn't do much good in the monologue. However, with the development of the times and the change of the specific environment, artists will reinterpret some historical events and inject their own feelings.