Which is more explosive, Qingqing's daily life or Cang Lan's decision?

In the long run, it is definitely a freesia tactic.

I watched four dramas this winter, the order of which was freesia tactic-northeast enrollment-story of Tang Dynasty-Qingqing's daily life. They were all put on the background board during fitness, but they were all magically and truly finished in the end. Among them, freesia tactic and Qingqing's daily life are all about sweet pets ... I feel that whether it is sweet pets or women's rights, freesia tactic is better and more thorough than Qingqing's daily life.

The label of "Hui Lan Ji" is an ancient puppet, and it doesn't talk about women's rights, but there are many plots of girls helping girls in the play, and these plots are not separated. For example, it is natural and inseparable for Dan Yin to choose to help Xiaolan get married and use Xiaolan's sisterhood against Butterfly Clothes. However, in daily life, she is very fragmented under the banner of women's rights.

For example, in episode 25-27, it's good for everyone to go all out to save the family. It's really burning, but ... If there is not a young man and an old six in front, can we use three girls, Yuan Ying, Li Wei and Shangguan Jing, plus at most one Zhao Fangru, to save the family?

I'm afraid I can't, because the setting in the play is that the family is ready to jump into the lake and her life is dying. Only the imperial doctor (equivalent to the emperor) in the main hall of Xinchuan can save her.

Moreover, only Master Xinchuan, that is, the Prince, can invite an imperial doctor.

In other words, without the help of the two princes, Jia Hao might have died and could not have survived.

Why are the two princes willing to help? Because they love their wives.

Similarly, why are Li Weiyuan and Shangguan Jing so confident outside that they can open restaurants, hotpot restaurants and mahjong parlors, but ordinary people can't?

Or because their husbands love and support them.

Frankly speaking, they wouldn't have opened a restaurant at all if the Sixth Young Master hadn't helped them get through their joints. The Third Young Master, the Minister of Household Affairs and Yue Gong all drank a pot.

There are many similar plots. For another example, the girl in solar terms quarreled with her third son and left home. The reason given by the solar term girl is that the third child takes them home but doesn't recognize their names, which is not good for them. The reason given by the third child is:

You eat mine, drink mine, I give you everything, and you call me bad?

At that time, there were a lot of words floating in the barrage, such as "Who will be your wife for free" and "That's not what you should do", which should be said by an underage girl. This looks very Japanese, but in fact, Lao San is not wrong at all, because his theoretical basis is: I give you all your economic foundation, and you talk to me about equality?

Similarly, the second child also said something similar to home, and directly depressed the home to suicide.

How to say this sentence ... It is true that many men like to threaten women with this sentence "I earned all the money", but it is a bloody fact. When a person's food, clothing, housing and transportation are attached to another person, she can't achieve real equality. Because she can't bring benefits to another person, everyone looks at benefits.

True women's rights must be that women can live independently of men before they can demand equal pay and respect.

But can the girls in this play, including the hostess, live independently without men? Didn't six young masters spoil the series of things done by Li Wei and Wei?

Not at all.

Only Yuan Ying, Shangguan Jing and the transformed family are good, more or less the accessories of the male master and the family. The so-called women's rights in this play are more like a group of women who eat and drink with their husbands' money, and then clamor for independence and equality and respect from their owners. Isn't it a bit of pastoral feminism?

In a word, the feminist rights of this play are still based on imperial power and male power, and the honor and wealth of women still depend on men. In this case, what do you talk to me about women's rights? But freesia tactic is not, freesia tactic has some feminist meaning in it.

I can only see sisterhood, but I can't see love, and I don't think how touching Andrew's feelings are. But looking at the tactics of freesia, I can feel the warm feelings of two-way exchanges between freesia. Later, Xiaolan's identity woke up. Li Wei should be the screenwriter who didn't arrange her birth. This is not comparable, so I won't say it. But after Xiaolan's identity awakens, what she thinks is not love, but fulfilling her responsibilities and sacrificing herself for the whole world.

From here, we can see that the screenwriter of freesia has some tricks, which are really worth savoring. Qingqing's daily life is far from perfect. She wants to love women's rights. As a result, she got nothing.