Hello, everyone. I am a sophomore. Each of us pays a class fee of 100 per semester. Class activities were organized a few days ago. It is said that tickets are bought with class fees. and

They are drunk and unreasonable, or their math is taught by the PE teacher. All the people paid the class fee, but only some people spent the class fee to play. In other words, someone went to play, but all the students had to pay the bill. Obviously, the person who went did harm to the person who didn't go, which is an unfair behavior in itself. People who don't go have no chance to play. Although it is voluntary, it objectively causes unfair distribution of class fees. If justice is guaranteed, everyone who didn't go should be paid back 45 yuan in the class fee. This is logic.

And your monitor thinks that the money belongs to the class when it is handed in, but he simply forgets how the money came from. In my opinion, the class fee is just everyone's money temporarily kept by the class. When the audience of the shift fee is the whole class, it can save the trouble of collecting money. Your monitor may think that the money will be wasted if you don't go. But you didn't go. You just lost 45 yuan in the initial payment of 65,438+000 by Yuan You. It didn't harm anyone else's interests. Let you pay 45 yuan again, that is, let you pay the bill for the person who went, just like the person who didn't go. This is sheer nonsense.

Logically, you are not wrong, you are absolutely right. But often the class is wrong because of its own unclear logic, and what is right becomes wrong, which is also a kind of sorrow. This belongs to the violence of the majority.