You always use the "correct" education method, but you don't know what hidden dangers are buried.

You always use the "correct" education method, but you don't know what hidden dangers are buried. As a mother, I fully understand that every parent in the world wants their baby to grow up in a safe and healthy environment. However, the parents reported Aesop's fable, which stipulated the all-round offline. The main reason for the report is that parents think Aesop's fables are full of dark fairy tales, which will cause psychological trauma to children. Famous children's classic books are crowned with terrible sun hats. It's a little ridiculous, a little incomprehensible. Parents often protect their sons in a way that they feel "appropriate" and hope that their sons will suffer as little as possible. Looking back on everyone's own growth history, everyone is also forbidden to see something by their parents. It's just that their "appropriateness" has quietly changed with the development of the times.

Children who are forbidden to evolve are influenced by "parental love". Because of this concept, in the sixties and seventies, parents forbade their children to watch cartoons, such as "Make a scene in Heaven". In the 1980s and 1990s, Hong Kong films coincided with the popularity, such as Jing Wong's movies, the shit in Stephen Chow's dirty jokes, the violence in underworld movies, the zombies in Ching-Ying Lam's hell ... especially "Young and Dangerous" was boycotted by parents. Today, it is not difficult to find that no matter what age, parents are likely to trust the animation of film and television dramas and the fairy tales of their literary types.

So these things are the best to understand and the most childish. At the beginning of life, human nature is good, and fairy tales have the function of enlightenment education. For people under the age of 18, we must first distinguish between good and evil. If it has some certainty, black and white are indistinguishable. Professional knowledge in the true sense is always difficult to understand. Only when children grow up and learn from themselves can we really distinguish it. Parents used to understand this truth. Enlightenment education is enlightenment education, not everything. I don't know why, but I always feel that my parents are more anxious than previous generations.

Clean up all the "not-so-good things" for children, which were forbidden by parents before. Although they are all imposed reasons, they can tell a truth: for safety, there is no need to teach bad. Today, parents seem to have come up with an "appropriate disinfectant". They seem to think that what is appropriate is physical and mental health, even exceeding the definition of these two words in their previous parents' period. Aesop's Fables is not the first fairy tale with a passive knife. In 2006, some parents asked CCTV to urgently ban the martial arts comic "Biography of the Seven Chivalrous Men in Lan Tu" because it was "low in specific content and full of terror and violence".

Not long ago, Diga was taken off the shelves because of violence. If it is violent, the Hulu brothers dumped eight scorpions, and the ghost mantis's wife ate her husband in the black cat sheriff and was literally dismembered on the spot. But this kind of parents, while restraining this cartoon, forget that "mantis eats husband" is scientific and reasonable, and "black cat of sheriff" is just for fun. Last June, Morphy Girl 2 was reported off the shelf. The reason for reporting is that the color of hair is still colorful and there is a problem with the value orientation. Seeing this, I really want to ask, shouldn't our children be colorful? The phrase "I am the boss here" said by a group of students after beating the leading actor in "Changing Martin" may also be regarded as "campus violence".