May I ask why the good people in the Three Gorges are called "good people"?

Why not ask why the Three Gorges? None of them belong to the Three Gorges.

Being a good person is not necessarily what we usually call "kindness."

I think "kindness" is only one aspect, and it is even more necessary to promote these two protagonists to thousands of lovely people like them in Qian Qian. They are good people, ordinary people. As the saying goes, "at the beginning of life, nature is good." Everyone is a good person, so good people are ordinary people! Just as "beauty" is common in "beauty country", "dwarf country" and "dwarf" are also common.

Three Gorges Good Man = Three Gorges Ordinary Man

By the way, attach something I wrote: If you can't understand the movie, just watch it carefully.

I am writing this post just to answer some questions.

First of all, some people say that watching movies has nothing to do with academic qualifications, which I agree with.

But movies (mainly literary films) are also art. Since they are art, of course, some people can understand them and some people can't. The higher the cultural literacy, the higher the ability to understand movies.

You can't expect people who have no education or little contact with literature and never think about life to see anything from this movie.

Literary film is to get the director's unique perspective, so from the beginning, the director will give up some audiences on his own initiative.

Therefore, even if you can't understand a certain literary film, you don't have to be too depressed. Aren't there so many good commercial films?

Then answer some friends' doubts (personal opinions, my classmates have asked me these questions):

1. Why is the title "Three Gorges Good Man"? Isn't the hero a Three Gorges man?

A: The thinking of ordinary people is always understood as "a good man in the Three Gorges". Can you understand it in another way? Does the director want to say "Three Gorges" and "Good People", or "Good People in Three Gorges"? Dear friends, please don't limit your thinking, because you are watching a literary film.

Second, the film has created two protagonists. What's the connection between them?

A: I can only hint at this question: pay attention to the gender of the protagonist, male and female. On the surface, they are not related. We discuss it in detail in the following questions.

3. What happened to the UFO in the film (the building lifted off)?

A: This clip should be analyzed in combination with the "Building Collapse" at the end of the film.

Please note: a woman (because her husband has no concern for home) divorced her husband.

What is the director's attitude when a woman dares to divorce a man?

Lift off! Let a woman's mind get rid of the bondage of the world and gain new freedom. Who says women can't live without men?

In this male-dominated country, does the hostess behave like Nana who ran away from home in Ibsen's A Doll's House?

The man and his ex-wife are together again.

What is the director's attitude? Collapse!

When the ex-wife took candy out of her pocket, when they were intoxicated with the short sweetness after eating, the building behind them collapsed.

Why did it collapse?

Dear friends, do you still know what a person will do when he goes back? Mining! The man in the film said that this job is very profitable, but it is very risky!

Speaking of which, do you all know why the director arranged the scene of "collapse"? Their union will be crushed by life sooner or later. Maybe the hero will die in a mine accident, and then will this family still exist? Will that woman and her daughter return to this place that will be abandoned?

Let's sum up:

A woman went to the Three Gorges to find her husband, in order to divorce him, to break up the family-to get rid of it.

Men come to the Three Gorges to find their ex-wife and get married-into the abyss.

Combined with our analysis above, can you think of the profound implication of the ending arranged by the director for these two roles?