Who can laugh last, Xiang, Wei Lai, Wei Ma, Hengchi or BYD?

BYD is not suitable here. First of all, BYD is not a new force to build cars. It can already be regarded as an old car company, and it is a new force that can subvert traditional fuel vehicles. It has not only pure electric vehicles, but also fuel vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles. The product line is relatively complete, and new energy sales have been leading for many years.

Putting BYD and these new forces together may be because the subject doesn't understand BYD. This is a traditional automobile enterprise, which has built the first 1.5T engine in China and the first dual-clutch gearbox in China, and mastered the core technology of ECU. It is the only enterprise in China that can produce IGBT, an electronic control chip for automobile instruments. BYD's investment in R&D is the highest in China, with the most patents. Its battery, motor and electronic control technology are unique in the world, and it is the only car company in the world that has mastered the core technology of Sanpower. BYD's plug-in hybrid, DM3.0, and even DMi4.0 listed next year are at least two generations ahead of other car companies!

Even if there is no new energy, BYD can still occupy a place in China with its fuel vehicles. 1.5L Xiaoyun engine has a daily efficiency of 43%, which is the highest thermal efficiency mass production engine in the world, and can be tied with Mazda Chuangchi Blue Sky. The daily efficiency of 1.5T engine used in fuel vehicles is 38%, which is still the first-class level in China.

Today's cars can be divided into three types according to the power system: fuel vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles and pure trams. For example, 48V light mixing, Japanese dual-engine weak mixing, and the participation of electricity is not high, so it belongs to the category of fuel vehicles. After all, the country also classifies twin engines as fuel-efficient models, not new energy sources. In the field of new energy, it is mainly plug-in hybrid pure electric, including extended-range electric vehicles, but also internal combustion engine vehicles, which can be classified as plug-in hybrid. There may be new energy sources powered by hydrogen in the future, but I am not optimistic about the prospect. I agree with Wang Chuanfu that ordinary people will not pay for environmental protection, but only for saving money. Unless hydrogen power can reach the same car cost as pure electricity, it needs to be as convenient as a gas station and solve safety problems, it is possible to occupy a place in the new energy field.

Although new energy is developing rapidly, it is still the world of fuel vehicles. Pure electric vehicles will definitely not be effectively popularized in a short time because of the problems of battery life and slow charging. Even though the battery life has reached more than 700 kilometers now, the battery life anxiety can't be solved because of the slow charging. Unless there is a qualitative breakthrough in battery technology.

At present, plug-in hybrid and extended range can completely replace fuel vehicles, which is different from pure electricity. Most family cars are mainly short-distance in urban areas, and the battery life of plug-in hybrid vehicles with pure electricity of about 80 kilometers can basically meet daily applications. If the cruising range exceeds, it is no problem to use fuel as a hybrid vehicle. In fact, the same is true of the extended range, except that compared with plug-in hybrid, the internal combustion engine can't participate in driving the vehicle, and it has an additional energy conversion, which is slightly inferior in power and fuel consumption. So the competitiveness is also very limited.

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle is the best transition before electric vehicle completely replaces fuel vehicle. I don't know how long this transition will last, but during the transition, plug-in hybrid vehicles are the best choice. In the hybrid field, no one is BYD's opponent. If you have the last laugh, don't compare with these new forces. Compared with Toyota Volkswagen, BYD deserves it.

Besides, Evergrande Hengchi

Talk about new forces, but this is too new. We commented that young people are full of vigor and vitality, and who will be more developed in the future, a little baby mixed in-saying that the baby is wrong, the car has not been officially listed, and it can only be regarded as a fetus. I dare not say that the car made by Evergrande has no future development prospects, but it is three years old and has not yet been born.

In the past few days, Hengchi 1 appeared, made two rounds in its own industrial park, and released several official maps. As a result, netizens saw that the tires were installed backwards ... here is a small science popularization. Hengchi 1 adopt continental brand 265/40.

R22 SUV tires are patterned, and the friction between different patterns and the ground is definitely different, and it also involves a drainage problem. Therefore, the tire is marked with the front and back, the inside is called inside and the outside is called outside, which is a mistake that the apprentice in the repair shop is not allowed to make. However, Evergrande invested 45 billion yuan to build a car, but made such a low-level mistake! From top to bottom, the official map was exposed and no one found it!

I don't know if this is a bad start, but the first impression is not very good. Professional people do professional things, and car companies are not afraid of making mistakes, but they can't make such amateur low-level mistakes! That's it. I don't like it.

I also take BYD as an example. Why did BYD ask Audi's designers to design the shape? Why hire Mercedes-Benz chassis experts to adjust the chassis? Even for quality control, we spent a lot of money to dig a professional quality control team. These accumulations cannot be achieved by investing money alone. And is it too much to invest 45 billion in car companies?

Weimar, Tucki, Weilai, even Ai 'an and Tesla.

Put them together because they only produce pure electric vehicles. We can't be wrong. Since we want to overtake in corners, it is obviously unwise for you to compete with others in the engine field. You can't develop an engine with independent property rights. It is very low to buy someone else's engine to save the car, so your decision can't be wrong.

But ... on the other hand, the threshold of pure electric vehicles is really too low.

I am the owner of BYD Tang. As a consumer, I came into contact with new energy earlier, and many people asked me questions about new energy vehicles. My point is: as long as the budget is sufficient, it is right to buy plug-in batteries, because plug-in batteries are better than fuel vehicles at the same price now, and they can perfectly replace fuel vehicles in all aspects-I am not a supporter of BYD, but no one can really do it in the field of plug-in. But ... pure trams are not recommended as long as they exceed 200 thousand. Including BYD, Tang and Han.

Why? Because the current pure electricity technology is still immature, 200,000 yuan can only buy an immature product. For example, Tesla and other Han EVs have a battery life of 600 kilometers. After two years, the battery technology broke through, and the pure tram with a battery life of 1000 kilometers only needs100000. And after all, there is the problem of endurance anxiety. Usually, charging piles are easy to find, but what should I do if I get together? The first five cars are waiting in line. You still have 30 kilometers to go. Can't you wait? These are all very realistic problems. Low-cost trams are ok, but for the sake of urban traffic, I simply don't drive long distances. Or there are more than two cars at home.

My point of view may be a bit biased-more than 200,000 pure trams have been cut with leeks.

Therefore, Weimar, Weilai, Tucki and even Tesla all have great uncertainties. The key is to see who can make a breakthrough in battery technology first and who can solve the problem of endurance anxiety first. The first car company to master the core technology will all win, and the rest of the car companies have nothing to say, so they can only learn from others and survive!

Of course, Tesla has a strong family and achieved a perfect transformation from playing capital to playing technology. People's technologies in the fields of autonomous driving and electronic control are beyond the reach of these new forces. However, the current pure tram is still immature, and there are too many uncertainties in the process of gradual maturity.

I haven't recommended these new forces to fans yet. If you want to buy a pure tram, I even recommend the Euler Good Cat of the Great Wall (suitable for women) or the big ant of Chery, which is guaranteed for life. After all, it is the Great Wall and Chery, and I believe it can be guaranteed for life. And these new forces, now only one or two models, sales are unstable, basically losing money every year. If it weren't for the support of the financial boss's father, they might have collapsed.

But then again, Tucki still has some strength in autonomous driving, and it is considered as the domestic leading level together with Guangzhou Automobile's Ai 'an. Wei has also made great progress in recent years. Personally, I am not optimistic about the power exchange mode, but the application of new materials and technologies is still unique. I don't like Weilai's operation very much. Selling services is better than selling cars. Maybe I can't keep up with my thinking, but I still feel that the product strength is the first, and it is still difficult to make up for the product strength by service for a long time.

As for Weimar automobile, hehe, I don't know much about it.

An addition program represented by Li.

There is an internal combustion engine in the extended range, but because the internal combustion engine does not participate in vehicle driving, it can only be called an extended range electric vehicle, not a hybrid vehicle. The advantage of doing this is to save the transmission parts needed by a series of engines, such as gearbox, but the disadvantage is also obvious, that is, there is one more energy conversion and insufficient power-compared with the internal combustion engine can participate in driving the vehicle.

Let's compare Tang DM and Li One, not to mention the body size and space, but only the power module. Tang DM let the engine and motor work together, and it can explode with an acceleration of 4.3S per 100 kilometers. Lee One is certainly not slower than the fuel truck, but at 6.5 seconds, the motor is actually working. When Tang runs at high speed, the engine is the main force, which can drive the vehicle and charge the battery at the same time, especially when driving at high speed, the advantages of internal combustion engine are obvious. Ideally, like all electric vehicles, electric vehicles can only accelerate by increasing the motor speed, and the power consumption is obvious when driving at high speed. At this time, the internal combustion engine needs to do work to generate electricity, which leads to high ideal fuel consumption. You said that the ideal size of the car body, 9- 10 oil per 100 kilometers is not bad, how to compare this, if it is not the extended range power mode, the fuel consumption can be completely lower.

Besides, the three-cylinder 1.2T internal combustion engine available in dongan power is really too weak. This also reflects the shortcomings of the new forces.

What I deny is not Li alone, nor is it an ideal, but an extension of the program. BYD's DM3.0 system has taken the extended program as a working mode, and the fuel consumption of DMi models can reach 3.8L in the state of power loss because of the extended program. Therefore, my view remains unchanged, and there is no future for extending the plan. Plug-in is the best solution before pure trams are completely popularized and replace fuel vehicles.

Finally, let me talk about my personal prediction. When BYD takes it out, people will definitely have the last laugh. This new energy revolution can be said to be started by BYD with the help of 542. (Of course, there are also policies at the national level. ) is unmatched by these new forces.

Hengchi has not been born yet, so there is no way to draw a conclusion, but will it be stillborn? Will it? Anyway, the tire thing doesn't bode well. If I were an executive of Evergrande, I would definitely say that I was maliciously targeted by my competitors and bought off employees. It's really embarrassing. There is no solution.

Among the four new forces making cars, I guess-I guess it may be Weimar. The spontaneous combustion door has just been exposed, and there is no inside information about spontaneous combustion. I really don't like it. Weimar may be the first out.

The second is Tucki. Although I said that Tucki has made some achievements in the field of autonomous driving, the software is good, but the hardware level ... I think Tucki is not making cars, but playing with capital.

The third one is ideal. After all, there is only one car at present, and it is an outdated extension. Li Yi's driving experience is not bad, but there are still many problems. I am equally pessimistic about the prospects.