Seven departments: the strictest algorithm should not be used as an assessment requirement for take-away food delivery staff? Is it really a good thing?

Seven departments, including the General Administration of Market Supervision, jointly issued the Guiding Opinions on Implementing the Responsibility of Online Catering Platform and Effectively Safeguarding the Rights and Interests of Take-away Food Delivery Personnel, which put forward all-round requirements for safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of take-away food delivery personnel. In terms of ensuring labor income, the platform is required to establish an income distribution mechanism that matches work tasks and labor intensity to ensure that the normal labor income of take-away food delivery staff is not lower than the local minimum wage. The "strictest algorithm" shall not be taken as the assessment requirement, and the assessment elements such as order quantity, punctuality rate and online rate shall be reasonably determined by means of "algorithm winning", and the delivery time limit shall be appropriately relaxed.

a good thing is definitely a good thing, which protects the legitimate rights and interests of millions of take-away food delivery staff, and enables these food delivery staff to get appropriate protection under special circumstances (rainstorm, gale, peak period), etc.

However, the guiding opinions are only opinions after all, which probably give a direction, but the specific implementation needs more supporting laws and regulations and institutional support from the two major delivery enterprises in the future.

without the latter, it can only be called an armchair strategist.

for example, make sure that the normal labor income of the take-away food delivery staff is not lower than the local minimum wage.

does "normal" mean working at least 8 hours a day and 4 hours a week? Or just working is normal.

then there will be many bugs, and even someone will definitely brush the bill.

The platform will complain, so shall I give the minimum wage to those who fish and run two orders eight hours a day in the future?

Take-away people will worry, will it be that I will work hard for more than 2 yuan an hour according to the minimum standard in the future?

And there are about 4 million riders like Meituan, and about 5, to 6, riders are active every day, and they are basically labor contracts.

It's not practical to make a one-size-fits-all approach. How to define a highly active rider who has actually relied on delivery to support his family needs to be studied by the regulatory authorities for a while.

but this one always needs to be changed. The manpower expenditure of Meituan last year was about 54 billion yuan, but there was basically no social security money in it. Counting the three types of insurance for the old-age medical shi industry, it is almost necessary to pay another 3%, which is about 16 billion.

Meituan reported a net profit of only 5 billion yuan last year. Except JD.COM, which will put social security in its own company, most large Internet companies will release social security to a third party for agency.

I believe that the US Mission will be unwilling at the first time, and will definitely increase the system assessment of third-party agencies and so on.

Among them, there are actually many problems that Internet companies will push to customers, such as: establishing a complaint channel with 24-hour feedback time for take-away workers, new trade union organizations, diversified commercial insurance, traffic safety training, and so on.

We'll pay for all this ourselves.