The difference between attributive clause and nominal clause

1. The differences between nominal clauses and attributive clauses are as follows:

1) Attributive clauses have antecedents, while nominal clauses have no antecedents.

The thing that you ate just now is a fly 。

What you ate just now is a fly 。

2) Attributive clauses cannot be guided by what, while nominal clauses can be guided by what or that. what acts as a subject such as an object in a nominal clause, and that does not act as a sentence component in a nominal clause. What-led noun clauses are often translated as "... meaning a specific thing", which is often singular. For example, "What you say is not what you think." What you said is not what you think of 。 "What I want is what you have in your pocket." What I want to get is what is in your pocket。 "You're lucky, you have beauty and wisdom that ordinary women can't easily get. You are lucky，you own what a woman doesn’t own ：beauty and wisdom 。 If someone appears in the what clause, (such as you, me, him) the clause is often active. If no one appears in the clause, the clause is often passive. For example, "What must be said has been beened said." "What can be eaten": what can be eaten has been eaten. You have done what you shouldn't have done. You should boldly imagine what you can imagine, but you should be careful what you can do. < P > 2. The difference between using what or that to guide nominal clauses: students are easily confused about using what or that to guide them. You can remind students to pay attention to observing the predicate verbs of clauses. If the predicate of clauses is a transitive verb and there is no object, you should use what. If the clauses are complete and there is no doubt, You should use that.

Use what, That to fill in the blanks:

1) _ _ _ _ You said is not right.

2) _ _ _ _ You said such words are not right.

3) _ _ _ _ You come is not right.

4) _ _ _ _ _ You give me is a help to me. < P > 5) _ _ _ _ You meet me is a help to me. < P > III. The difference between a nominal clause guided by who and an attributive clause: 1. Nominal clauses have no antecedents. (1) The girl who is chosen is very happy. (2) Who is chosen is not known.

2 Attributive clauses are often translated as "the person" while nominal clauses are often translated as "who"

Three part-of-speech clauses are often used with unknown and uncertain main clauses. For example, "I don't know" has not been decided yet "is still a problem", and not only who, such as where, when, why and how are all applicable to this feature of being used with the three main clauses of "unknown uncertainty", but the attributive clauses guided by who are all definite and will not be used with the main clause of "unknown uncertainty".

(3) Who will be chosen is not known.

(4) The girl who was chosen yesterday is my sister.

There is a host to entertain guests. Some guests came, and he said, "Those who should have come didn't come." As a result, some people who had already come thought that they were "shouldn't have come" and left. The master said again, "What shouldn't have left has left again." As a result, the people who were still at the scene thought that they were "the ones who should have left" and left again. The above sentences are all definite, so you can't use nominal clauses, you must use attributive clauses. What the host said was "The persons who should come have' t come. ”“The persons who should not leave have left 。 What the guest thought was: "The persons who should not come have come." “The persons who should leave haven‘t leave 。 "

6) Who will win in the end is still unknown?

7) Those who should have won didn't win, and those who shouldn't have won again.

8) Those who deserve praise are not praised.

9) Who should be praised is still a question.

4. Features of subject clauses guided by where, where, when, why, how, and which: 1. It can only be used with the main clause of "unknown uncertainty". 2. There are doubtful factors in the meaning of the sentence. Choose the corresponding question guide word according to the meaning of the sentence. If there is no doubt, it must be that. For example, 1) _ _ _ _ The president was hit by a shoe in the hall yesterday was quit funny. The sentence is complete and there is no doubt. Be sure to use that to guide. 2) _ _ _ _ The president was hit by a shoe in the hall yesterday was not known. "Was not known" belongs to the main sentence "unknown and uncertain" and certainly can't use that. There is no shortage of time, place, way or "that one" in the clause. Then when, where ,how ,which are excluded, and only two words can be used. 3) _ _ _ He lives is still a question. "Is still a question" belongs to the clause of "the main sentence is unknown and uncertain", so it is definitely not possible to use that. Related to the clause predicate live, it should be an adverbial of missing place, and it is correct to use where to guide it. 4) _ _ _ _ _ He is late is a riddle .. 5) _ _ _ _ _ He will go has not been decided. 6) _ _ _ _ _ I will marry is not known .. 7) _ _ _ _. ..