Urgent! How far is the law from us! 8 words composition!

it's time for judicial registration every year, and no matter how many people come to the scene to confirm every day, just from the teams of dozens of training institutions camped in front of the registration office of the judicial bureau, we can see how powerful the students of the law business are. There are not only law majors among the applicants, but also management, accounting and even medicine and architecture majors, which is very impressive. The influence and attraction of the law is not limited to the legal profession. Since the construction of a country ruled by law was written into the amendment of our Constitution, the publicity activities of the rule of law, such as sending the law to the countryside, entering the community, and public welfare legal consultation, have come one after another. The slogan that the law should not only be observed, but also be believed in has been cited again and again. All this seems to make people feel that the law is around us and within reach. Especially for students from law classes, it has always been taken for granted to make legal work their career. Even if it is difficult to make it a career, it has become a conscious pursuit to regard law as a partner. However, two months' practice in the court-two months' experience of close contact with the law in judicial practice made me rethink the distance between the law and us, what kind of state it is now and what kind of state it should be.

During the three years of studying law, teachers have carefully created the sacred values of law for our reserve army, which has just stepped into the door of legal person. Both the records of China's ancient unicorn and the tradition of the British king under the law convey the belief of equality and justice of the law. Therefore, before we knew the legal elements of infringement and what maritime lien was, we had abandoned the layman's view that law was a complicated legal provision and began to understand it with reverence. Law is not just a simple combination of laws and regulations, it just reveals the fruits that we can easily see on the ground, and what is constantly losing nutrition to them is the root buried underground and deeply rooted-jurisprudence. This is the essence of legal education. Understanding and applying the law is only the first step, and analyzing and critically thinking about the law is a deeper layer. In the fairy tale and vision of a balance in the left hand and a sword in the right hand, generations of lawyers have come out of the law school, no matter at home or abroad.

In our social life, there will always be acts involving laws, and the voice of improving citizens' rights is being shouted louder and louder through various forms of keeping pace with the times, such as network openness, government affairs openness, environmental rights, demolition law and so on. However, it is surprising that when we really get involved in a lawsuit for some reason, our attitude completely changes.

during the internship, we had ample opportunities to meet all kinds of parties involved in the lawsuit, from well-funded legal persons to weak citizens, from company bosses to retired workers, from elderly old wives to young people who are newly married, but no matter who they are, they tried their best to avoid going to court to solve disputes. And this fear of the court is getting stronger and stronger with the weakening of the strength of the parties. I remember a couple who were sued by a branch of China Bank for their mortgage. When they were informed by us that they had come to the court to collect the complaint and other documents, they immediately hung up the phone, and they never answered it again. Without filing a complaint, the proceedings could not be advanced. We had to mail it instead, but the parties still escaped by deliberately not being at home during the day. Finally, we had to deliver it in person. I happened to meet my wife to buy food and go home. Although she entered the house, she said that she didn't sign for anything, saying that she didn't know anything and couldn't just sign for it and bear legal responsibility. Signing for the service receipt is only the means and evidence for the court to fulfill the legal service procedure, but most of the parties are reluctant to sign for it. At first, I thought it was enough to explain it clearly to the parties. Later, the judge who instructed us explained that the panic and fear of the parties were not aimed at these documents, but the whole litigation. The more you explained, the more doubts they had. This fear of litigation is very common among ordinary people. Regardless of whether he knows the law or not, for a person who may not have contact with the court all his life, the image of the court and the procuratorate may have been fixed as the epitome of impartial and enforcement, and the deterrent power of the two court uniforms is indeed very powerful.

In contrast, the communication between lawyers and courts is very smooth, and there is no need for too much explanation. The two sides are silent and smile. After all, they are in the "Jianghu" and know each other. People who study law seem to like to define that a social relationship and an act should be defined layer by layer, civil or administrative, criminal, contract or tort, contracting fault or improper performance of breach of contract, until the specific provisions in the legal provisions can be directly applied. In line with this way of thinking, each department law is also clearly defined, according to one side. Recently, the term "the same body of law" and "legal person" are hot, and there are signs of trying to circle the same body of legal profession out of society. The legal profession has the rules of legal profession. As an independent body, it has a standardized way of communication (French), a unified value system (fairness, justice, efficiency, etc.), its own moral system (legal professional ethics), and even a unique way of thinking, temperament and even clothing. This kind of professional * * * is conducive to enriching the ternary society of "citizen-civil society-country" and promoting industry autonomy. However, unilaterally delineating the external boundaries of the same body will inevitably strengthen the separation between law and other fields of society, which will have more serious consequences for law, a discipline and professional field with strong application and sociality. The dislocation and difficulty caused by the communication between non-legal person and court mentioned above is an example.

thus, the first paradox appears. On the one hand, the legal professionals become an independent * * * isomorphism, which is gradually distinguished from other groups. On the other hand, legal persons have to interact and blend with people outside the circle. First of all, "the life of law lies not in logic, but in experience", and an excellent judge must be a person with rich life experience and profound experience. To some extent, law is a tool. Judges are often compared to doctors. After a long period of professional training, facing all kinds of complicated social relations, they use the laws and jurisprudence in their hands to diagnose and find out the crux of the problem, prescribe the right medicine, and propose fair and reasonable solutions, thus restoring the state of peace. In the final analysis, the object of law is our social relations. Without social life and life experience, law has no place to live. Secondly, law is not equal to litigation, and justice is the last line of defense to safeguard justice. Most disputes in human society are solved by alternative dispute resolution mechanism or at least first, and only a small part of them actually go to court. Even if litigation is adopted, taking the grass-roots court where I practice as an example, the proportion of judgment, mediation and withdrawal of a simple civil and commercial case is basically 1:1:1. In all cases that can be mediated, the judge always mediates first as far as possible, so that both parties can reach an agreement or directly withdraw the lawsuit, and the judgment is really unsuccessful. Mediation is a project that comprehensively uses various ways to resolve disputes. It is inseparable from the most basic jurisprudence and combines reason and psychology. The judge is not absolutely independent of the disputes of the parties, but seeks the most suitable solution with them in a guiding way.

the second paradox is that, on the one hand, the litigants evade and are afraid of litigation, on the other hand, the number of cases accepted by Chinese courts is among the best in terms of both total and per capita. The number and proportion of judges in foreign countries are far less than that in China, but the work pressure faced by such a huge court system is still very heavy. One potential reason may be that the alternative dispute resolution mechanism is still not standardized and mature in China, especially the connection with judicial proceedings. Many parties are aiming at the deterrent and coercive power of the national judicial power to start a lawsuit. Private lending disputes often apply for sealing up and preservation in the procedure, exerting pressure on the other party by the authority of the court, and withdrawing the lawsuit immediately after they compromise.

From this point of view, the law is really far away from us, and people are afraid of and love justice. This may be related to the characteristics of the law itself, but it is certain that the situation in developed countries is better. The development of the whole body of law is deeper there, but the judges who account for a very small proportion of the population have gained high status and respect in developed countries, especially the nine justices of the Supreme Court of the United States have even become an important driving force for the rule of law in the United States. The lengthy judicial precedents have also made the access of lawyers very strict and difficult, and the independence of the legal profession is obviously higher than ours. Nevertheless, the law has not fallen into a dilemma. There are two important reasons. First, in order to avoid the monopoly of justice by legal persons, Britain and the United States established the jury system at the beginning of the formation of the tradition of rule of law, and in some cases, let ordinary citizens participate in the process of ascertaining legal facts. The people's jury system is also implemented in the first instance of cases in China, but it is suspected of being ineffective in practice and has not received due results. Second, amendments and precedents of great significance in the constitutional process have become a guarantee of civil rights to a certain extent, and they are vivid examples of legal publicity and education. Coupled with the good operation of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, the courts have accepted relatively few cases, and the sense of citizenship and rights has almost become the endorsement of the law, and the fear of litigation lacks the soil for growth.

The professionalism of law does not necessarily make the law far away from us. How to position our law really needs deep thinking. When bringing a law, I hope people will think of not only solemn courts, complicated litigation documents and procedures, but also the wisdom of judges, the basic rights of citizens and social justice.